Literature DB >> 28701549

Altered visual strategies and attention are related to increased force fluctuations during a pinch grip task in older adults.

Kevin G Keenan1,2, Wendy E Huddleston3,2, Bradley E Ernest3.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to determine the visual strategies used by older adults during a pinch grip task and to assess the relations between visual strategy, deficits in attention, and increased force fluctuations in older adults. Eye movements of 23 older adults (>65 yr) were monitored during a low-force pinch grip task while subjects viewed three common visual feedback displays. Performance on the Grooved Pegboard test and an attention task (which required no concurrent hand movements) was also measured. Visual strategies varied across subjects and depended on the type of visual feedback provided to the subjects. First, while viewing a high-gain compensatory feedback display (horizontal bar moving up and down with force), 9 of 23 older subjects adopted a strategy of performing saccades during the task, which resulted in 2.5 times greater force fluctuations in those that exhibited saccades compared with those who maintained fixation near the target line. Second, during pursuit feedback displays (force trace moving left to right across screen and up and down with force), all subjects exhibited multiple saccades, and increased force fluctuations were associated (rs = 0.6; P = 0.002) with fewer saccades during the pursuit task. Also, decreased low-frequency (<4 Hz) force fluctuations and Grooved Pegboard times were significantly related (P = 0.033 and P = 0.005, respectively) with higher (i.e., better) attention z scores. Comparison of these results with our previously published results in young subjects indicates that saccadic eye movements and attention are related to force control in older adults.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The significant contributions of the study are the addition of eye movement data and an attention task to explain differences in hand motor control across different visual displays in older adults. Older participants used different visual strategies across varying feedback displays, and saccadic eye movements were related with motor performance. In addition, those older individuals with deficits in attention had impaired motor performance on two different hand motor control tasks, including the Grooved Pegboard test.
Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aging; attention; force steadiness; hand; visual strategies

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28701549      PMCID: PMC5668463          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00928.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  84 in total

1.  Head and eye gaze dynamics during visual attention shifts in complex environments.

Authors:  Anup Doshi; Mohan M Trivedi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Aging, visuomotor correction, and force fluctuations in large muscles.

Authors:  Brian L Tracy; Devin V Dinenno; Bjorn Jorgensen; Seth J Welsh
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.411

3.  Motor tests and cognition in healthy older adults.

Authors:  Lee Ashendorf; Jana L Vanderslice-Barr; Robert J McCaffrey
Journal:  Appl Neuropsychol       Date:  2009-07

4.  Motor assessment using the NIH Toolbox.

Authors:  David B Reuben; Susan Magasi; Heather E McCreath; Richard W Bohannon; Ying-Chih Wang; Deborah J Bubela; William Z Rymer; Jennifer Beaumont; Rose Marie Rine; Jin-Shei Lai; Richard C Gershon
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  Age-Related Deficits in Visuospatial Memory Are due to Changes in Preparatory Set and Eye-Hand Coordination.

Authors:  Melanie Rose Burke; Charlotte Poyser; Ingo Schiessl
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 4.077

6.  Steadiness in plantar flexor muscles and its relation to postural sway in young and elderly adults.

Authors:  Motoki Kouzaki; Minoru Shinohara
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.217

7.  The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  J E Hoffman; B Subramaniam
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-08

8.  Assessing dexterity function: a comparison of two alternatives for the NIH Toolbox.

Authors:  Ying-Chih Wang; Susan R Magasi; Richard W Bohannon; David B Reuben; Heather E McCreath; Deborah J Bubela; Richard C Gershon; William Z Rymer
Journal:  J Hand Ther       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 1.950

9.  Effect of phenserine treatment on brain functional activity and amyloid in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Ahmadul Kadir; Niels Andreasen; Ove Almkvist; Anders Wall; Anton Forsberg; Henry Engler; Göran Hagman; Marie Lärksäter; Bengt Winblad; Henrik Zetterberg; Kaj Blennow; Bengt Långström; Agneta Nordberg
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 10.422

10.  Active inference, attention, and motor preparation.

Authors:  Harriet Brown; Karl Friston; Sven Bestmann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-09-21
View more
  2 in total

1.  Force variability is mostly not motor noise: Theoretical implications for motor control.

Authors:  Akira Nagamori; Christopher M Laine; Gerald E Loeb; Francisco J Valero-Cuevas
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 4.475

2.  Spiral tracing on a touchscreen is influenced by age, hand, implement, and friction.

Authors:  Brittany D Heintz; Kevin G Keenan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.