Literature DB >> 19946670

A new measurement technique for the tibiofemoral contact point in normal knees and knees with TKR.

R J de Jong1, P J C Heesterbeek, A B Wymenga.   

Abstract

Flexion gap instability after cruciate retaining TKR allows paradoxical anterior movement of the femur during flexion. The tibiofemoral contact point (CP) moves anteriorly and produces a decrease in the lever arm of the extensor apparatus. This can provoke patellofemoral, tibiofemoral-joint pain and instability for the patient. In order to quantify the amount of paradoxical motion on a 90 degrees flexion radiograph of the knee, the average normal CP of the natural knee should be known. There are no known CP measurement methods suited for natural knees and knees with TKR that can be applied in daily practice, and only estimations for the CP position have been made. Therefore, a CP measurement technique on lateral radiographs that can be applied to natural knees and knees with a TKR has been developed. The reproducibility of this method was assessed. It was then used to determine the normal range of the CP in natural knees. The medial contact point in the natural knee in 90 degrees of flexion was determined to be at 68% (+/-6.6%) of the AP diameter of the tibia measured below the tibia-plateau simulating a bone resection with TKR. This reproducible CP measurement method can be used clinically to evaluate the CP after knee prosthesis and also in patients with suspected ligament lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19946670     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-009-0986-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  33 in total

1.  Laxity in posterior cruciate sparing and posterior stabilized total knee prostheses.

Authors:  D Dejour; G Deschamps; L Garotta; H Dejour
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Making sense of knee arthroplasty kinematics: news you can use.

Authors:  Scott A Banks; M K Harman; J Bellemans; W A Hodge
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Tibiofemoral contact points relative to flexion angle measured with MRI.

Authors:  Per Wretenberg; Dan K Ramsey; Gunnar Németh
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  Accuracy of stress radiography techniques in grading isolated and combined posterior knee injuries: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Guido Garavaglia; Anne Lubbeke; Victor Dubois-Ferrière; Domizio Suva; Daniel Fritschy; Jacques Menetrey
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Posterior condylar offset and flexion in posterior cruciate-retaining and posterior stabilized TKA.

Authors:  Motoya Arabori; Nobuzo Matsui; Ryosuke Kuroda; Kiyonori Mizuno; Minoru Doita; Masahiro Kurosaka; Shinichi Yoshiya
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2008-02-16       Impact factor: 1.601

6.  Posterior instability of the knee near extension. A clinical and stress radiographic analysis of acute injuries of the posterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  H U Stäubli; R P Jakob
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1990-03

7.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  M J Archibeck; R A Berger; R M Barden; J J Jacobs; M B Sheinkop; A G Rosenberg; J O Galante
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Rollback in posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty. A radiographic analysis.

Authors:  H Kim; R R Pelker; D H Gibson; J F Irving; J K Lynch
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  The role of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee replacement.

Authors:  A N Misra; M R A Hussain; N J Fiddian; G Newton
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2003-04
View more
  12 in total

1.  PCL balancing, an example of the need to couple detailed biomechanical parameters with clinical functional outcome.

Authors:  P J C Heesterbeek; A B Wymenga
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  A new spacer-guided, PCL balancing technique for cruciate-retaining total knee replacement.

Authors:  P J C Heesterbeek; L Labey; P Wong; B Innocenti; A B Wymenga
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Posterior Shift of Contact Point between Femoral Component and Polyethylene in the LCS Rotating Platform Implant under Weight Bearing Condition.

Authors:  Won Seok Oh; Yong Seuk Lee; Byung Kak Kim; Jae Ang Sim; Beom Koo Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2016-06-01

4.  Intra-operative gaps affect outcome and postoperative kinematics in vivo following cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Eisaku Fujimoto; Yoshiaki Sasashige; Tetsuya Tomita; Hirofumi Sasaki; Yoriko Touten; Yuusuke Fujiwara; Mitsuo Ochi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Superior long-term survival for fixed bearing compared with mobile bearing in ligament-balanced total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  P J C Heesterbeek; A H van Houten; J S Klenk; H Eijer; B Christen; A B Wymenga; A J Schuster
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Geometric variable designs of cam/post mechanisms influence the kinematics of knee implants.

Authors:  Ali Fallahiarezoodar; Mohammed Rafiq Abdul Kadir; Mina Alizadeh; Sangeetha Vasudevaraj Naveen; T Kamarul
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Do tibiofemoral contact point and posterior condylar offset influence outcome and range of motion in a mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  G J P Geijsen; P J C Heesterbeek; G van Stralen; P G Anderson; A B Wymenga
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Different femorotibial contact points between fixed- and mobile-bearing TKAs do not show clinical impact.

Authors:  R A van Stralen; P J C Heesterbeek; A B Wymenga
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-07-20       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Patella position is not a determinant for anterior knee pain 10 years after balanced gap total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Albert H van Houten; Petra J C Heesterbeek; Ate B Wymenga
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Accurate alignment and high function after kinematically aligned TKA performed with generic instruments.

Authors:  Stephen M Howell; Stelios Papadopoulos; Kyle T Kuznik; Maury L Hull
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.