Literature DB >> 12135550

Tibiofemoral contact points relative to flexion angle measured with MRI.

Per Wretenberg1, Dan K Ramsey, Gunnar Németh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether knee flexion influenced bony contact movements during flexion.
DESIGN: Accurate three-dimensional (3D) measurements of tibiofemoral bony contact points in vivo was performed using magnetic resonance imaging technology at 0 degrees, 30 degrees and 60 degrees of flexion.
BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging is an accurate non-invasive tool for visualizing muscles, tendons, and bone, and provides precise 3D co-ordinates.
METHODS: Magnetic resonance imaging recordings were made from the right knee of 16 subjects with no history of knee dysfunction at 0 degrees, 30 degrees and 60 degrees of flexion. Joint contact movements were reported as changes of the contact point's position on the medial and lateral tibial condyle with respect to a fixed reference point for each flexion angle.
RESULTS: The dominant motion of the centroid of the contact area was posterior with a concomitant inferior and lateral displacement when flexing from 0-30 degrees. Increased flexion to 60 degrees the contact points moved slightly anterior, superior and continued laterally. Comparing movements between the medial and lateral compartments, larger displacement magnitudes were observed laterally. Additionally, tibial rotations of 3-5 degrees were noted relative to the femur.
CONCLUSION: Based on magnetic resonance imaging co-ordinates and the rotated anatomical reference frame, the geometric equations to derive the contact point between the tibiofemoral articulating surfaces is a viable means to investigate tibiofemoral bony contact movement. RELEVANCE: Contact areas and pressure distributions have been reported using cadaveric specimens but interpretation of the results is limited. Other investigations have been restricted to sagittal plane movement. Using kinematic magnetic resonance imaging, accurate non-invasive 3D recordings of the normal knee at increments of flexion are possible. The normative baseline date can be compared against that of the pathological knee, such as cruciate ligament injury or the status of post-operative meniscectomy in order to examine skeletal joint motion and stability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12135550     DOI: 10.1016/s0268-0033(02)00036-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  23 in total

1.  Evaluation of the chondral modeling theory using fe-simulation and numeric shape optimization.

Authors:  Jeffrey H Plochocki; Carol V Ward; Douglas E Smith
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Influence of tibial slope on extension and flexion gaps in total knee arthroplasty: increasing the tibial slope affects both gaps.

Authors:  Andrej Maria Nowakowski; Marcus Kamphausen; Geert Pagenstert; Victor Valderrabano; Magdalena Müller-Gerbl
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-05-25       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Native rotational knee kinematics is restored after lateral UKA but not after medial UKA.

Authors:  Keizo Wada; Daisuke Hamada; Tomoya Takasago; Akihiro Nitta; Tomohiro Goto; Ichiro Tonogai; Yoshihiro Tsuruo; Koichi Sairyo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Gait mechanics in those with/without medial compartment knee osteoarthritis 5 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Ashutosh Khandha; Kurt Manal; Elizabeth Wellsandt; Jacob Capin; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; Thomas S Buchanan
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  Kinematic characteristics of the tibiofemoral joint during a step-up activity.

Authors:  Jing-Sheng Li; Ali Hosseini; Lucile Cancre; Nolan Ryan; Harry E Rubash; Guoan Li
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 2.840

6.  Increased tibiofemoral cartilage contact deformation in patients with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency.

Authors:  Samuel K Van de Velde; Jeffrey T Bingham; Ali Hosseini; Michal Kozanek; Louis E DeFrate; Thomas J Gill; Guoan Li
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2009-12

7.  A new measurement technique for the tibiofemoral contact point in normal knees and knees with TKR.

Authors:  R J de Jong; P J C Heesterbeek; A B Wymenga
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Tibiofemoral kinematics and condylar motion during the stance phase of gait.

Authors:  Michal Kozanek; Ali Hosseini; Fang Liu; Samuel K Van de Velde; Thomas J Gill; Harry E Rubash; Guoan Li
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  An in vivo subject-specific 3D functional knee joint model using combined MR imaging.

Authors:  Bailiang Chen; Tryphon Lambrou; Amaka C Offiah; Pedro A Gondim Teixeira; Martin Fry; Andrew Todd-Pokropek
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2012-12-02       Impact factor: 2.924

10.  Screw-Home Movement of the Tibiofemoral Joint during Normal Gait: Three-Dimensional Analysis.

Authors:  Ha Yong Kim; Kap Jung Kim; Dae Suk Yang; Sang Wook Jeung; Han Gyeol Choi; Won Sik Choy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2015-08-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.