PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to investigate whether a new posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) balancing approach with a spacer technique during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) reproduced the correct tibiofemoral contact point (CP) location. It was hypothesized that it should be possible to adequately balance the PCL with this geometrical technique, obtaining correct position and stability of the medial femoral condyle, independent of insert shape. METHODS: Nine fresh-frozen full-leg cadaver specimens were used. After native testing, prototype components of a new PCL-retaining implant were implanted using navigation and a bone-referencing technique. After finishing the bone cuts, the spacer technique was used to ascertain balancing of the PCL and the tibial cut was corrected if necessary. Passive and squat motions were performed before and after TKA using a dynamic knee simulator while tibiofemoral kinematics were recorded using six infrared cameras. CPs (native and implant) were calculated as the projections of the femoral condylar centres on the horizontal plane of the tibia. RESULTS: The spacer technique resulted in correct PCL balancing in all specimens. The kinematic patterns of native and replaced knees showed no statistically significant differences in passive and squat motions. The medial CP after TKA was at the same position as in the native knee. No paradoxical sliding forward was seen after TKA, supporting our hypothesis. CONCLUSIONS: The spacer technique can be applied by surgeons during PCL-retaining TKA and will lead to good PCL balancing, indicated by a correct CP, no lift-off in flexion and no posterior sag.
PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to investigate whether a new posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) balancing approach with a spacer technique during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) reproduced the correct tibiofemoral contact point (CP) location. It was hypothesized that it should be possible to adequately balance the PCL with this geometrical technique, obtaining correct position and stability of the medial femoral condyle, independent of insert shape. METHODS: Nine fresh-frozen full-leg cadaver specimens were used. After native testing, prototype components of a new PCL-retaining implant were implanted using navigation and a bone-referencing technique. After finishing the bone cuts, the spacer technique was used to ascertain balancing of the PCL and the tibial cut was corrected if necessary. Passive and squat motions were performed before and after TKA using a dynamic knee simulator while tibiofemoral kinematics were recorded using six infrared cameras. CPs (native and implant) were calculated as the projections of the femoral condylar centres on the horizontal plane of the tibia. RESULTS: The spacer technique resulted in correct PCL balancing in all specimens. The kinematic patterns of native and replaced knees showed no statistically significant differences in passive and squat motions. The medial CP after TKA was at the same position as in the native knee. No paradoxical sliding forward was seen after TKA, supporting our hypothesis. CONCLUSIONS: The spacer technique can be applied by surgeons during PCL-retaining TKA and will lead to good PCL balancing, indicated by a correct CP, no lift-off in flexion and no posterior sag.