Literature DB >> 9268796

Rollback in posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty. A radiographic analysis.

H Kim1, R R Pelker, D H Gibson, J F Irving, J K Lynch.   

Abstract

A clinical and radiographic study of 49 posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasties in 38 patients (11 bilateral, 27 unilateral), using prostheses of the same design, was undertaken to quantify the amount of in vivo rollback (ie, the anteroposterior translation of the tibia with respect to the femur during flexion). The mean difference in the distances between the contact points of the knees in full extension and in 90 degrees flexion (ie, the rollback distance) was a posterior translation of the contact point of -0.2 mm (-12.7 to +7l6 mm; SD, 4.7 mm) relative to the prosthetic tibial tray, corresponding to an average translation of 0% of the prosthetic tibial tray depth, and -0.2 mm (-12.5 to +9.1 mm; SD, 4.8 mm) relative to the tibia itself, corresponding to an average translation of 0% of the true tibial surface depth. The differences between the rollback values obtained from the 90 degrees and full-extension radiographs relative to the prosthetic tibial tray (P = .63) and the true tibia (P = .89) were not statistically significant. Intraobserver (P = .27-.50) and interobserver (P = .13-.72) reliability tests showed that the differences between radiographic measurements taken by the same observer at two different points in time and by two different observers were not statistically significant. No correlations were found between the degree of translation of the tibiofemoral contact point relative to the prosthetic tibial tray and the posterior tilt of the tibial tray (R2 = .12), the preoperative tibiofemoral angle (R2 = .34), and the postoperative tibiofemoral angle (R2 = .027). No correlations were found between the degree of translation of the tibiofemoral contact point relative to the true tibia and the posterior tilt of the tibial tray (R2 = .16), the preoperative tibiofemoral angle (R2 = .14), and the postoperative tibiofemoral angle (R2 = .034). In conclusion, this study indicated no demonstrable rollback occurring in the posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty used in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9268796     DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(97)90179-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  11 in total

1.  Significant effect of the posterior tibial slope and medial/lateral ligament balance on knee flexion in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Eisaku Fujimoto; Yoshiaki Sasashige; Yasuji Masuda; Takashi Hisatome; Akio Eguchi; Tetsuo Masuda; Mikiya Sawa; Yoshinori Nagata
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  The Self-Aligning knee prosthesis: clinical and radiological outcome and survival analysis at 5-year follow up.

Authors:  M J F Diks; P G Anderson; J C A D Janssen; G van Stralen; A B Wymenga
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  [A novel knee endoprosthesis with a physiological joint shape. Part 1: Biomechanical basics and tribological studies].

Authors:  K-H Frosch; T Floerkemeier; C Abicht; P Adam; H Dathe; J Fanghänel; K M Stürmer; D Kubein-Meesenburg; H Nägerl
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  The self-aligning knee prosthesis: clinical and radiological outcome and survival analysis of a cruciate retaining meniscal bearing knee at 10-year follow-up.

Authors:  R A van Stralen; P G Anderson; A B Wymenga
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  A new spacer-guided, PCL balancing technique for cruciate-retaining total knee replacement.

Authors:  P J C Heesterbeek; L Labey; P Wong; B Innocenti; A B Wymenga
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Influence of intra-operative joint gaps on post-operative flexion angle in posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Koji Takayama; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Seiji Kubo; Hirotsugu Muratsu; Kazunari Ishida; Takehiko Matsushita; Masahiro Kurosaka; Ryosuke Kuroda
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  A new measurement technique for the tibiofemoral contact point in normal knees and knees with TKR.

Authors:  R J de Jong; P J C Heesterbeek; A B Wymenga
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Do tibiofemoral contact point and posterior condylar offset influence outcome and range of motion in a mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  G J P Geijsen; P J C Heesterbeek; G van Stralen; P G Anderson; A B Wymenga
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Effect of posterior condylar offset in post operative range of motion in cruciate retaining and sacrificing TKR: A comparative analysis.

Authors:  Goutham D V Goutham; Vijay Kumar Jain; Skand Sinha; Rajendra Kumar Arya
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-06-29

10.  Biomechanical Effects of Posterior Condylar Offset and Posterior Tibial Slope on Quadriceps Force and Joint Contact Forces in Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kyoung-Tak Kang; Yong-Gon Koh; Juhyun Son; Oh-Ryong Kwon; Jun-Sang Lee; Sae Kwang Kwon
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-11-19       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.