Literature DB >> 16797896

Acoustic model investigation of a multiple carrier frequency algorithm for encoding fine frequency structure: implications for cochlear implants.

Chandra S Throckmorton1, M Selin Kucukoglu, Jeremiah J Remus, Leslie M Collins.   

Abstract

Current cochlear implants provide frequency resolution through the number of channels. Improving resolution by increasing channels is limited by factors such as the physiological feasibility of increasing the number of electrodes, the inability to increase the number of channels for those already implanted, and the increased possibility of channel interactions reducing channel efficacy. Recent studies have suggested an alternative method: providing a continuum of pitch percepts for each channel based on the frequency content of that channel. This study seeks to determine the frequency resolution necessary for the highest performance gain, which may give some indication of the feasibility for implementation in implants. A discrete set of carrier frequencies, instead of a continuum, are evaluated using an acoustic model to measure speech recognition. Performance increased as the number of available frequencies increased, and substantive improvement was seen with as few as two frequencies per channel. The effect of variable frequency discrimination was also assessed, and the results suggest that frequency modulation can still provide benefits with poor frequency discrimination on some channels. These results suggest that if two or more discriminable frequencies per channel can be generated for cochlear implant subjects then an improvement in speech recognition may be possible.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16797896     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2006.03.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  7 in total

1.  The effect of frequency estimation on speech recognition using an acoustic model of a cochlear implant.

Authors:  Chandra S Throckmorton; M Selin Kucukoglu; Jeremiah J Remus; Leslie M Collins
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-03-31       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  The intelligibility of pointillistic speech.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Timothy M Streeter; Antje Ihlefeld; Ross K Maddox; Christine R Mason
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Investigating the effects of stimulus duration and context on pitch perception by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Joshua S Stohl; Chandra S Throckmorton; Leslie M Collins
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Cochlear implants: system design, integration, and evaluation.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Stephen Rebscher; William Harrison; Xiaoan Sun; Haihong Feng
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-11-05

5.  Mandarin Chinese tone identification in cochlear implants: predictions from acoustic models.

Authors:  Kenneth D Morton; Peter A Torrione; Chandra S Throckmorton; Leslie M Collins
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Speech recognition in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of standard HiRes and HiRes 120 sound processing.

Authors:  Jill B Firszt; Laura K Holden; Ruth M Reeder; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Speech perception problems of the hearing impaired reflect inability to use temporal fine structure.

Authors:  Christian Lorenzi; Gaëtan Gilbert; Héloïse Carn; Stéphane Garnier; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 11.205

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.