BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Metallic implants induce massive artifacts in CT images which deteriorate image quality and often superimpose structures of interest. The purpose of this study was to apply and evaluate a dedicated MAR method for neuroradiologic intracranial clips and detachable platinum coiling events. We here report the first clinical results for MAR in FDCT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: FDCT volume scans of several patients treated with endovascular coiling or intracranial clipping were corrected by using a dedicated FDCT MAR correction algorithm combined with an edge-preserving attenuation-normalization method in the projection space. Corrected and uncorrected images were compared by 2 experienced radiologists and evaluated for several image-quality features. RESULTS: After application of our algorithm, implant delineation and visibility were highly improved. CT values compared with values in metal artifact-unaffected areas showed good agreement (average correction of 1300 HU). Image noise was reduced overall by 27%. Intracranial hemorrhage in the direct surroundings of the implanted coil or clip material was displayed without worrisome metal artifacts, and our algorithm even allowed diagnosis in areas where extensive information losses were seen. The high spatial resolution provided by FDCT imaging was well preserved. CONCLUSIONS: Our MAR method provided metal artifact-reduced images in every studied case. It reduced image noise and corrected CT values to levels comparable with images measured without metallic implants. An overall improvement of brain tissue modeling and implant visibility was achieved. MAR in neuroradiologic FDCT imaging is a promising step forward for better image quality and diagnosis in the presence of metallic implants.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Metallic implants induce massive artifacts in CT images which deteriorate image quality and often superimpose structures of interest. The purpose of this study was to apply and evaluate a dedicated MAR method for neuroradiologic intracranial clips and detachable platinum coiling events. We here report the first clinical results for MAR in FDCT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: FDCT volume scans of several patients treated with endovascular coiling or intracranial clipping were corrected by using a dedicated FDCT MAR correction algorithm combined with an edge-preserving attenuation-normalization method in the projection space. Corrected and uncorrected images were compared by 2 experienced radiologists and evaluated for several image-quality features. RESULTS: After application of our algorithm, implant delineation and visibility were highly improved. CT values compared with values in metal artifact-unaffected areas showed good agreement (average correction of 1300 HU). Image noise was reduced overall by 27%. Intracranial hemorrhage in the direct surroundings of the implanted coil or clip material was displayed without worrisome metal artifacts, and our algorithm even allowed diagnosis in areas where extensive information losses were seen. The high spatial resolution provided by FDCT imaging was well preserved. CONCLUSIONS: Our MAR method provided metal artifact-reduced images in every studied case. It reduced image noise and corrected CT values to levels comparable with images measured without metallic implants. An overall improvement of brain tissue modeling and implant visibility was achieved. MAR in neuroradiologic FDCT imaging is a promising step forward for better image quality and diagnosis in the presence of metallic implants.
Authors: Rebecca Fahrig; Robert Dixon; Thomas Payne; Richard L Morin; Arundhuti Ganguly; Norbert Strobel Journal: Med Phys Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: G Richter; T Engelhorn; T Struffert; M Doelken; O Ganslandt; J Hornegger; W A Kalender; A Doerfler Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2007-09-24 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: M Doelken; T Struffert; G Richter; T Engelhorn; C Nimsky; O Ganslandt; T Hammen; A Doerfler Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2008-03-11 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Andrew J Molyneux; Richard S C Kerr; Ly-Mee Yu; Mike Clarke; Mary Sneade; Julia A Yarnold; Peter Sandercock Journal: Lancet Date: 2005 Sep 3-9 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: M-N Psychogios; P Schramm; J-H Buhk; A Xyda; K Gröschel; K Jung; M Knauth Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2010-07-15 Impact factor: 3.825