Literature DB >> 19939848

Frequency matching of vocalizations to inner-ear sensitivity along an altitudinal gradient in the coqui frog.

Sebastiaan W F Meenderink1, Mirja Kits, Peter M Narins.   

Abstract

Acoustic communication involves both the generation and the detection of a signal. In the coqui frog (Eleutherodactylus coqui), it is known that the spectral contents of its calls systematically change with altitude above sea level. Here, distortion product otoacoustic emissions are used to assess the frequency range over which the inner ear is sensitive. It is found that both the spectral contents of the calls and the inner-ear sensitivity change in a similar fashion along an altitudinal gradient. As a result, the call frequencies and the auditory tuning are closely matched at all altitudes. We suggest that the animal's body size determines the frequency particulars of the call apparatus and the inner ear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19939848      PMCID: PMC2865046          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0763

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  9 in total

1.  Level dependence of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the leopard frog, Rana pipiens pipiens.

Authors:  Sebastiaan W F Meenderink; Pim van Dijk
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Detailed f1, f2 area study of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the frog.

Authors:  Sebastiaan W F Meenderink; Peter M Narins; Pim van Dijk
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-04-22

3.  Comparison between distortion product otoacoustic emissions and nerve fiber responses from the basilar papilla of the frog.

Authors:  Sebastiaan W F Meenderink; Pim van Dijk; Peter M Narins
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Factors influencing the evolution of acoustic communication: biological constraints.

Authors:  M J Ryan
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.808

5.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions provide clues hearing mechanisms in the frog ear.

Authors:  Pantelis N Vassilakis; Sebastiaan W F Meenderink; Peter M Narins
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Sexual differences in the auditory system of the tree frog Eleutherodactylus coqui.

Authors:  P M Narins; R R Capranica
Journal:  Science       Date:  1976-04-23       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the tree frog Hyla cinerea.

Authors:  P van Dijk; G A Manley
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Temperature-dependence of auditory nerve response properties in the frog.

Authors:  I B Stiebler; P M Narins
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in frogs: correlation with middle and inner ear properties.

Authors:  Pim van Dijk; Matthew J Mason; Peter M Narins
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.208

  9 in total
  10 in total

Review 1.  Mechanics of the frog ear.

Authors:  Pim Van Dijk; Matthew J Mason; Richard L M Schoffelen; Peter M Narins; Sebastiaan W F Meenderink
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Auditory brainstem responses in Cope's gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis): effects of frequency, level, sex and size.

Authors:  Katrina M Schrode; Nathan P Buerkle; Elizabeth F Brittan-Powell; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Behavioural tuning in a tropical amphibian along an altitudinal gradient.

Authors:  Sebastiaan W F Meenderink; Patricia M Quiñones; Peter M Narins
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Climate change and frog calls: long-term correlations along a tropical altitudinal gradient.

Authors:  Peter M Narins; Sebastiaan W F Meenderink
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Sex differences and endocrine regulation of auditory-evoked, neural responses in African clawed frogs (Xenopus).

Authors:  Ian C Hall; Sarah M N Woolley; Ursula Kwong-Brown; Darcy B Kelley
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Reciprocal Matched Filtering in the Inner Ear of the African Clawed Frog (Xenopus laevis).

Authors:  Ariadna Cobo-Cuan; Peter M Narins
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-01-06

7.  Female presence and estrous state influence mouse ultrasonic courtship vocalizations.

Authors:  Jessica L Hanson; Laura M Hurley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Geographic variation in the matching between call characteristics and tympanic sensitivity in the Weeping lizard.

Authors:  Antonieta Labra; Claudio Reyes-Olivares; Felipe N Moreno-Gómez; Nelson A Velásquez; Mario Penna; Paul H Delano; Peter M Narins
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 9.  The big potential of the small frog Eleutherodactylus coqui.

Authors:  Sarah E Westrick; Mara Laslo; Eva K Fischer
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Stream noise, hybridization, and uncoupled evolution of call traits in two lineages of poison frogs: Oophaga histrionica and Oophaga lehmanni.

Authors:  Fernando Vargas-Salinas; Adolfo Amézquita
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.