Literature DB >> 12372639

Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in frogs: correlation with middle and inner ear properties.

Pim van Dijk1, Matthew J Mason, Peter M Narins.   

Abstract

Four frog species, Rana pipiens, Scaphiopus couchii, Xenopus laevis and Bombina orientalis, were examined for distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE). These species were chosen for their diverse otic morphologies. Rana has a well-developed caudal extension of the amphibian papilla within the inner ear; Scaphiopus, Xenopus and Bombina do not. Rana and Scaphiopus have a tympanic middle ear, Xenopus has a subcutaneous tympanic disk and Bombina has only an operculum. DPOAEs were present in Rana and Xenopus, with amplitudes up to 55 and 20 dB SPL, respectively. DPOAEs could be detected in neither Scaphiopus nor Bombina. These results show that (1) a well-developed caudal extension is not necessary for generation of DPOAEs, and (2) a tympanic middle ear is neither required nor sufficient to have DPOAEs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12372639     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(02)00605-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  13 in total

1.  Tectorial membrane morphological variation: effects upon stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin; David S Velenovsky; Kevin E Bonine
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Auditory brainstem responses to airborne sounds in the aquatic frog Xenopus laevis: correlation with middle ear characteristics.

Authors:  Bharti Katbamna; John A Brown; Melissa Collard; Charles F Ide
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-12-02       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Beyond the limits: identifying the high-frequency detectors in the anuran ear.

Authors:  Ariadna Cobo-Cuan; T Ulmar Grafe; Peter M Narins
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Multifrequency forcing of a Hopf oscillator model of the inner ear.

Authors:  K A Montgomery
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Inner ear formation during the early larval development of Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  Quincy A Quick; Elba E Serrano
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.780

6.  Aroclor 1254 impairs the hearing ability of Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  Bharti Katbamna; Anna Jelaso Langerveld; Charles F Ide
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-05-16       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Tone and call responses of units in the auditory nerve and dorsal medullary nucleus of Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  Taffeta M Elliott; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Darcy B Kelley
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Frequency matching of vocalizations to inner-ear sensitivity along an altitudinal gradient in the coqui frog.

Authors:  Sebastiaan W F Meenderink; Mirja Kits; Peter M Narins
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Otoacoustic emissions in humans, birds, lizards, and frogs: evidence for multiple generation mechanisms.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin; Dennis M Freeman; James C Saunders; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-05-24       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Reciprocal Matched Filtering in the Inner Ear of the African Clawed Frog (Xenopus laevis).

Authors:  Ariadna Cobo-Cuan; Peter M Narins
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-01-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.