Literature DB >> 11223293

Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the tree frog Hyla cinerea.

P van Dijk1, G A Manley.   

Abstract

The frog inner ear contains two hearing organs: the amphibian and the basilar papilla. The amphibian papilla is sensitive to low- and mid-frequency stimuli (0.1--0.5 and 0.5--1.3 kHz, respectively, in Hyla cinerea), while the basilar papilla is sensitive to high-frequency stimuli (2.8--3.9 kHz in H. cinerea). Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) were recorded from the ear of the tree frog H. cinerea. In each of six ears investigated, a cubic distortion product (DP) at 2f(1)--f(2) was present when the primary frequencies f(1) and f(2) and the DP frequency were close to either the mid- or the high-frequency range. At frequencies between the sensitive ranges of both papillae, no emissions were observed. For the basilar papilla, the dependence of DP level on the primary tone frequency ratio f(2)/f(1) showed a pattern characteristic of the response of a single nonlinear resonator. Thus, in agreement with neural data, DPOAE from the basilar papilla reflect the contribution of a single auditory filter to emission generation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11223293     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(00)00251-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  15 in total

1.  Detailed f1, f2 area study of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the frog.

Authors:  Sebastiaan W F Meenderink; Peter M Narins; Pim van Dijk
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-04-22

2.  Temperature dependence of anuran distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Sebastiaan W F Meenderink; Pim van Dijk
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-05-25

3.  Comparison of group delays of 2f(1)-f(2) distortion product otoacoustic emissions and cochlear travel times.

Authors:  Mario A Ruggero
Journal:  Acoust Res Lett Online       Date:  2004-10

4.  Beyond the limits: identifying the high-frequency detectors in the anuran ear.

Authors:  Ariadna Cobo-Cuan; T Ulmar Grafe; Peter M Narins
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 5.  Mechanics of the frog ear.

Authors:  Pim Van Dijk; Matthew J Mason; Richard L M Schoffelen; Peter M Narins; Sebastiaan W F Meenderink
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Simultaneous Intracochlear Pressure Measurements from Two Cochlear Locations: Propagation of Distortion Products in Gerbil.

Authors:  Wei Dong
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-12-01

7.  A novel signal processing approach to auditory phantom perception.

Authors:  I-Hui Hsieh; Jia-Wei Liu
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

8.  Recovery of otoacoustic emissions after high-level noise exposure in the American bullfrog.

Authors:  Dwayne D Simmons; Rachel Lohr; Helena Wotring; Miriam D Burton; Rebecca A Hooper; Richard A Baird
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 9.  Mechanics of the exceptional anuran ear.

Authors:  Richard L M Schoffelen; Johannes M Segenhout; Pim van Dijk
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Frequency matching of vocalizations to inner-ear sensitivity along an altitudinal gradient in the coqui frog.

Authors:  Sebastiaan W F Meenderink; Mirja Kits; Peter M Narins
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 3.703

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.