Literature DB >> 3567542

Factors influencing the evolution of acoustic communication: biological constraints.

M J Ryan.   

Abstract

Numerous studies have investigated selective forces that appear to influence the evolution of acoustic communication systems. I review a number of constraints on evolution in these systems. A species' history is of undeniable importance in the analysis of any trait. However, studies have given little or no attention to phylogenetic patterns of acoustic signals. This precludes the identification of phylogenetic constraints, and should be viewed as a serious constraint on our ability to understand how communication systems evolve. Morphological constraints influence the energetic efficiency of acoustic communication. To maximize transmission distance of signals used in long-range communication, the animal's morphology favors signals with high frequencies. Thus morphology acts in opposition to properties of the environment, which favor low frequencies for use in long-range communication. Sensory receptors also play an important role in the evolution of acoustic signals. There is significant variation in the frequency range to which an inner-ear organ of the frog is sensitive. Different lineages of frogs are characterized by ear organs with different ranges of sensitivity. This variation should influence the frequency range over which calls evolved and, as a consequence, might have influenced the rate at which different lineages of anurans speciate.

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3567542     DOI: 10.1159/000118693

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Behav Evol        ISSN: 0006-8977            Impact factor:   1.808


  12 in total

1.  The energetic basis of acoustic communication.

Authors:  James F Gillooly; Alexander G Ophir
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Behavioural tuning in a tropical amphibian along an altitudinal gradient.

Authors:  Sebastiaan W F Meenderink; Patricia M Quiñones; Peter M Narins
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  A cervid vocal fold model suggests greater glottal efficiency in calling at high frequencies.

Authors:  Ingo R Titze; Tobias Riede
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  Frequency matching of vocalizations to inner-ear sensitivity along an altitudinal gradient in the coqui frog.

Authors:  Sebastiaan W F Meenderink; Mirja Kits; Peter M Narins
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Brevity is prevalent in bat short-range communication.

Authors:  Bo Luo; Tinglei Jiang; Ying Liu; Jing Wang; Aiqing Lin; Xuewen Wei; Jiang Feng
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-02-02       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Novel vocal repertoire and paired swimbladders of the three-spined toadfish, Batrachomoeus trispinosus: insights into the diversity of the Batrachoididae.

Authors:  Aaron N Rice; Andrew H Bass
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Distinct neural and neuromuscular strategies underlie independent evolution of simplified advertisement calls.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Leininger; Darcy B Kelley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Mitigation of informational masking in individuals with single-sided deafness by integrated bone conduction hearing aids.

Authors:  Bradford J May; Stephen Bowditch; Yinda Liu; Marc Eisen; John K Niparko
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Groups of bats improve sonar efficiency through mutual suppression of pulse emissions.

Authors:  Jenna Jarvis; William Jackson; Michael Smotherman
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Phylogenetic signal in the acoustic parameters of the advertisement calls of four clades of anurans.

Authors:  Bruno Gingras; Elmira Mohandesan; Drasko Boko; W Tecumseh Fitch
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.