INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to evaluate a non-invasive method for measuring myocardial perfusion defect size in mice using a clinical single-photon emission computed tomography system equipped with pinhole collimators (pinhole SPECT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty days after ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery, 13 mice (C57BL/6J) were imaged following intravenous injection of 370 MBq [99mTc]sestamibi. Eight control mice without myocardial infarction were likewise investigated. Image quality optimization had been achieved by repeated scanning of a multiple point phantom, with varying zoom factors, number of projection angles, and pinhole diameter. Volumetric sampling was used to generate polar maps, in which intensity was normalized to that of a standard septal region of interest (ROI), which was set at 100%. Receiver operating characteristic analyses were performed to define an optimal threshold as compared to histologically measured defect sizes, which were considered as gold standard. RESULTS: A spatial resolution of 1.9 mm was achieved using a pinhole diameter of 0.5 mm, a zoom factor of 2, and 6 degrees projection angles. Histological results were best reproduced by a 60% threshold relative to the septal reference ROI. By applying this threshold, SPECT perfusion defect sizes revealed very high correlation to the histological results (R(2) = 0.867) with excellent intra- and interobserver reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.84 and 0.82). CONCLUSIONS: We achieved a spatial resolution of 1.9 mm in myocardial perfusion imaging in mice using a clinical SPECT system mounted with pinhole collimators. Compared to a histological gold standard, the infarct sizes were accurately estimated, indicating that this method shows promise to monitor experimental cardiac interventions in mice.
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to evaluate a non-invasive method for measuring myocardial perfusion defect size in mice using a clinical single-photon emission computed tomography system equipped with pinhole collimators (pinhole SPECT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty days after ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery, 13 mice (C57BL/6J) were imaged following intravenous injection of 370 MBq [99mTc]sestamibi. Eight control mice without myocardial infarction were likewise investigated. Image quality optimization had been achieved by repeated scanning of a multiple point phantom, with varying zoom factors, number of projection angles, and pinhole diameter. Volumetric sampling was used to generate polar maps, in which intensity was normalized to that of a standard septal region of interest (ROI), which was set at 100%. Receiver operating characteristic analyses were performed to define an optimal threshold as compared to histologically measured defect sizes, which were considered as gold standard. RESULTS: A spatial resolution of 1.9 mm was achieved using a pinhole diameter of 0.5 mm, a zoom factor of 2, and 6 degrees projection angles. Histological results were best reproduced by a 60% threshold relative to the septal reference ROI. By applying this threshold, SPECT perfusion defect sizes revealed very high correlation to the histological results (R(2) = 0.867) with excellent intra- and interobserver reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.84 and 0.82). CONCLUSIONS: We achieved a spatial resolution of 1.9 mm in myocardial perfusion imaging in mice using a clinical SPECT system mounted with pinhole collimators. Compared to a histological gold standard, the infarct sizes were accurately estimated, indicating that this method shows promise to monitor experimental cardiac interventions in mice.
Authors: T Hirai; R Nohara; R Hosokawa; M Tanaka; H Inada; Y Fujibayashi; M Fujita; J Konishi; S Sasayama Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2000 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Takahiro Higuchi; Stephan G Nekolla; Antanas Jankaukas; Axel W Weber; Marc C Huisman; Sybille Reder; Sibylle I Ziegler; Markus Schwaiger; Frank M Bengel Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Lars Stegger; Anne-Nadine Hoffmeier; Klaus P Schäfers; Sven Hermann; Otmar Schober; Michael A Schäfers; Gregor Theilmeier Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Zhonglin Liu; George A Kastis; Gail D Stevenson; Harrison H Barrett; Lars R Furenlid; Matthew A Kupinski; Dennis D Patton; Donald W Wilson Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: S Naidoo-Variawa; A J Hey-Cunningham; W Lehnert; P L Kench; M Kassiou; R Banati; S R Meikle Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2007-10-26 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Adelaide Greco; Maria Piera Petretta; Michele Larobina; Sara Gargiulo; Mariarosaria Panico; Stephan G Nekolla; Giovanni Esposito; Mario Petretta; Arturo Brunetti; Alberto Cuocolo Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2012-03-07 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Andrei Todica; Mathias J Zacherl; Hao Wang; Guido Böning; Nathalie L Jansen; Carmen Wängler; Peter Bartenstein; Michael C Kreissl; Marcus Hacker; Stefan Brunner; Sebastian Lehner Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2014-09-05 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Andrei Todica; Stefan Brunner; Guido Böning; Sebastian Lehner; Stephan G Nekolla; Moritz Wildgruber; Christopher Übleis; Carmen Wängler; Martina Sauter; Karin Klingel; Paul Cumming; Peter Bartenstein; Ralf Schirrmacher; Wolfgang Michael Franz; Marcus Hacker Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Stefan Brunner; Andrei Todica; Guido Böning; Stefan G Nekolla; Moritz Wildgruber; Sebastian Lehner; Martina Sauter; Christopher Ubleis; Karin Klingel; Paul Cumming; Wolfgang Michael Franz; Marcus Hacker Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2012-08-03 Impact factor: 3.138