Literature DB >> 19936788

Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET-CT metabolic index for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Peng Xie1, Jin-Bo Yue, Han-Xi Zhao, Xin-Dong Sun, Li Kong, Zheng Fu, Jin-Ming Yu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and metabolic index (MI) from fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).
METHODS: From October 2002 to July 2004, 41 patients with NPC who underwent (18)F-FDG PET-CT scan before and after radiotherapy were reviewed retrospectively. All patients received intensity-modulated radiotherapy using 6MV X-rays. We examined the association of MTV and the results of long-term follow-up of the patients.
RESULTS: Patients having tumors with an MTV below 30 cm(3) had significantly better 5-year overall survival (OS) (84.6:46.7%, P = 0.006) and disease-free survival (DFS) (73.1:40.0%, P = 0.014) than patients with an MTV of 30 cm(3) or greater. And the patients with MI below 130 had significantly higher 5-year OS (88.0:43.8%, P = 0.002) and DFS (76.0:37.5%, P = 0.005) than other patients. In the Cox multivariate analysis, MI and metabolic response (MR) were predictive of DFS, and we did not find a significant relationship between standard uptake value (SUV) and OS or DFS.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows that tumor volume parameters, especially the combination of MTV and SUV in the "metabolic index", are valuable for predicting long-term survival. High MI may be useful for identifying patients requiring more aggressive treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19936788     DOI: 10.1007/s00432-009-0729-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0171-5216            Impact factor:   4.553


  32 in total

1.  Anatomy of SUV. Standardized uptake value.

Authors:  S C Huang
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.408

2.  Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma.

Authors:  Bruce D Cheson; Beate Pfistner; Malik E Juweid; Randy D Gascoyne; Lena Specht; Sandra J Horning; Bertrand Coiffier; Richard I Fisher; Anton Hagenbeek; Emanuele Zucca; Steven T Rosen; Sigrid Stroobants; T Andrew Lister; Richard T Hoppe; Martin Dreyling; Kensei Tobinai; Julie M Vose; Joseph M Connors; Massimo Federico; Volker Diehl
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Correlation between proliferating cell nuclear antigen and p53 protein expression and 5-year survival rate in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Ling-Feng Wang; Chee-Yin Chai; Wen-Rei Kuo; Chih-Feng Tai; Ka-Wo Lee; Kuen-Yao Ho
Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.808

4.  Prognostic assessment of 2,361 patients who underwent pulmonary resection for non-small cell lung cancer, stage I, II, and IIIA.

Authors:  M T van Rens; A B de la Rivière; H R Elbers; J M van Den Bosch
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Diagnostic and prognostic value of [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  R J Wong; D T Lin; H Schöder; S G Patel; M Gonen; S Wolden; D G Pfister; J P Shah; S M Larson; D H Kraus
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Expressions of Ku70 and DNA-PKcs as prognostic indicators of local control in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Sang-Wook Lee; Kyung-Ja Cho; Jin-Hong Park; Sang Yoon Kim; Soon Yuhl Nam; Bong-Jae Lee; Sung-Bae Kim; Seung-Ho Choi; Jong Hoon Kim; Seung Do Ahn; Seong Soo Shin; Eun Kyung Choi; Eunsil Yu
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-08-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Time course of early response to chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients with 18F-FDG PET/CT.

Authors:  Claude Nahmias; Wahid T Hanna; Lindi M Wahl; Misty J Long; Karl F Hubner; David W Townsend
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Metabolic tumor volume predicts for recurrence and death in head-and-neck cancer.

Authors:  Trang H La; Edith J Filion; Brit B Turnbull; Jackie N Chu; Percy Lee; Khoa Nguyen; Peter Maxim; Andy Quon; Edward E Graves; Billy W Loo; Quynh-Thu Le
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 9.  Ensuring the right PET scan for the right patient.

Authors:  Stephen G Spiro; John Buscombe; Gary Cook; Tim Eisen; Fergus Gleeson; Mary O'Brien; Michael D Peake; Nicholas P Rowell; Richard Seymour
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 5.705

10.  Prediction for distant failure in patients with stage M0 nasopharyngeal carcinoma: the role of standardized uptake value.

Authors:  Sheng-Chieh Chan; Joseph Tung-Chieh Chang; Hung-Ming Wang; Chien-Yu Lin; Shu-Hang Ng; Kang-Hsing Fan; Shy-Chyi Chin; Chua-Ta Liao; Tzu-Chen Yen
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2008-05-19       Impact factor: 5.337

View more
  36 in total

1.  Prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume and velocity in predicting head-and-neck cancer outcomes.

Authors:  Karen P Chu; James D Murphy; Trang H La; Trevor E Krakow; Andrei Iagaru; Edward E Graves; Annie Hsu; Peter G Maxim; Billy Loo; Daniel T Chang; Quynh-Thu Le
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Validation that metabolic tumor volume predicts outcome in head-and-neck cancer.

Authors:  Chad Tang; James D Murphy; Brian Khong; Trang H La; Christina Kong; Nancy J Fischbein; A Dimitrios Colevas; Andrei H Iagaru; Edward E Graves; Billy W Loo; Quynh-Thu Le
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 3.  The role of PET/CT in the management of patients affected by head and neck tumors: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Giovanni Cammaroto; Natale Quartuccio; Alessandro Sindoni; Francesca Di Mauro; Federico Caobelli
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Prognostic value of metabolic tumor burden on 18F-FDG PET in nonsurgical patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Shengri Liao; Bill C Penney; Kristen Wroblewski; Hao Zhang; Cassie A Simon; Rony Kampalath; Ming-Chi Shih; Naoko Shimada; Sheng Chen; Ravi Salgia; Daniel E Appelbaum; Kenji Suzuki; Chin-Tu Chen; Yonglin Pu
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Value of early evaluation of treatment response using 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters and the Epstein-Barr virus DNA load for prediction of outcome in patients with primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Yu-Hung Chen; Kai-Ping Chang; Sung-Chao Chu; Tzu-Chen Yen; Ling-Yi Wang; Joseph Tung-Chieh Chang; Cheng-Lung Hsu; Shu-Hang Ng; Shu-Hsin Liu; Sheng-Chieh Chan
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Metabolic tumor volume is an independent prognostic factor in patients treated definitively for non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Percy Lee; Jose G Bazan; Philip W Lavori; Dilani K Weerasuriya; Andrew Quon; Quynh-Thu Le; Heather A Wakelee; Edward E Graves; Billy W Loo
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 4.785

7.  Association between serum tumor markers and metabolic tumor volume or total lesion glycolysis in patients with recurrent small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Pengyue Shi; Xue Meng; Mengmeng Ni; Xindong Sun; Ligang Xing; Jinming Yu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 2.967

8.  Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET image-based parameters in oesophageal cancer and impact of tumour delineation methodology.

Authors:  Mathieu Hatt; Dimitris Visvikis; Nidal M Albarghach; Florent Tixier; Olivier Pradier; Catherine Cheze-le Rest
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  18F-FDG PET or PET-CT to evaluate prognosis for head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Peng Xie; Minghuan Li; Hanxi Zhao; Xindong Sun; Zheng Fu; Jinming Yu
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 4.553

10.  Predictive and prognostic value of metabolic tumour volume and total lesion glycolysis in solid tumours.

Authors:  Christophe Van de Wiele; Vibeke Kruse; Peter Smeets; Mike Sathekge; Alex Maes
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.