Literature DB >> 21946983

Prognostic value of metabolic tumor burden on 18F-FDG PET in nonsurgical patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Shengri Liao1, Bill C Penney, Kristen Wroblewski, Hao Zhang, Cassie A Simon, Rony Kampalath, Ming-Chi Shih, Naoko Shimada, Sheng Chen, Ravi Salgia, Daniel E Appelbaum, Kenji Suzuki, Chin-Tu Chen, Yonglin Pu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to assess the prognostic value of metabolic tumor burden on 2-deoxy-2-[(18)F]fluoro-D-glucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT measured with metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG), independent of Union Internationale Contra la Cancrum (UICC)/American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor, node, and metastasis (TNM) stage, in comparison with that of standardized uptake value (SUV) in nonsurgical patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
METHODS: This study retrospectively reviewed 169 consecutive nonsurgical patients (78 men, 91 women, median age of 68 years) with newly diagnosed NSCLC who had pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET/CT scans. The (18)F-FDG PET/CT scans were performed in accordance with National Cancer Institute guidelines. The MTV of whole-body tumor (MTV(WB)), of primary tumor (MTV(T)), of nodal metastases (MTV(N)), and of distant metastases (MTV(M)); the TLG of whole-body tumor (TLG(WB)), of primary tumor (TLG(T)), of nodal metastases (TLG(N)), and of distant metastases (TLG(M)); the SUV(max) of whole-body tumor (SUV(maxWB)), of primary tumor (SUV(maxT)), of nodal metastases (SUV(maxN)), and of distant metastases (SUV(maxM)) as well as the SUV(mean) of whole-body tumor (SUV(meanWB)), of primary tumor (SUV(meanT)), of nodal metastases (SUV(meanN)), and of distant metastases (SUV(meanM)) were measured with the PETedge tool on a MIMvista workstation with manual adjustment. The median follow-up among survivors was 35 months from the PET/CT (range 2-82 months). Statistical methods included Kaplan-Meier curves, Cox regression, and C-statistics.
RESULTS: There were a total of 139 deaths during follow-up. Median overall survival (OS) was 10.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 9.0-13.2 months]. The MTV was statistically associated with OS. The hazard ratios (HR) for 1 unit increase of ln(MTV(WB)), √(MTV(T)), √(MTV(N)), and √(MTV(M)) before/after adjusting for stage were: 1.47/1.43 (p < 0.001/<0.001), 1.06/1.05 (p < 0.001/<0.001), 1.11/1.10 (p < 0.001/<0.001), and 1.04/1.03 (p = 0.007/0.043), respectively. TLG had statistically significant associations with OS with the HRs for 1 unit increase in ln(TLG(WB)), √(TLG(T)), √(TLG(N)), and √(TLG(M)) before/after adjusting for stage being 1.36/1.33 (p < 0.001/<0.001), 1.02/1.02 (p = 0.001/0.002), 1.05/1.04 (p < 0.001/<0.001), and 1.02/1.02 (p = 0.003/0.024), respectively. The ln(SUV(maxWB)) and √(SUV(maxN)) were statistically associated with OS with the corresponding HRs for a 1 unit increase before/after adjusting for stage being 1.46/1.43 (p = 0.013/0.024) and 1.22/1.16 (p = 0.002/0.040). The √(SUV(meanN)) was statistically associated with OS before and after adjusting for stage with HRs for a 1 unit increase of 1.32 (p < 0.001) and 1.24 (p = 0.015), respectively. The √(SUV(meanM)) and √(SUV(maxM)) were statistically associated with OS before adjusting for stage with HRs for a 1 unit increase of 1.26 (p = 0.017) and 1.18 (p = 0.007), respectively, but not after adjusting for stage (p = 0.127 and 0.056). There was no statistically significant association between OS and √(SUV(maxT)), ln(SUV(meanWB)), or √(SUV(meanT)). There was low interobserver variability among three radiologists with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) greater than 0.94 for SUV(maxWB), ln(MTV(WB)), and ln(TLG(WB)). Interobserver variability was higher for SUV(meanWB) with an ICC of 0.806.
CONCLUSION: Baseline metabolic tumor burdens at the level of whole-body tumor, primary tumor, nodal metastasis, and distant metastasis as measured with MTV and TLG on FDG PET are prognostic measures independent of clinical stage with low inter-observer variability and may be used to further stratify nonsurgical patients with NSCLC. This study also suggests MTV and TLG are better prognostic measures than SUV(max) and SUV(mean). These results will need to be validated in larger cohorts in a prospective study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21946983     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-011-1934-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  30 in total

1.  Standardised FDG uptake: a prognostic factor for inoperable non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Gerben R Borst; José S A Belderbos; Ronald Boellaard; Emile F I Comans; Katrien De Jaeger; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Joos V Lebesque
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  Prognostic assessment of 2,361 patients who underwent pulmonary resection for non-small cell lung cancer, stage I, II, and IIIA.

Authors:  M T van Rens; A B de la Rivière; H R Elbers; J M van Den Bosch
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  Metabolic tumor volume of [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography predicts short-term outcome to radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy in pharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Man Ki Chung; Han-Sin Jeong; Sang Gyu Park; Jeon Yeob Jang; Young-Ik Son; Joon Young Choi; Seung Hyup Hyun; Keunchil Park; Myung-Ju Ahn; Yong Chan Ahn; Hyung-Jin Kim; Young-Hyeh Ko; Chung-Hwan Baek
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Prognostic value of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomographic scanning in patients with thyroid cancer.

Authors:  W Wang; S M Larson; M Fazzari; S K Tickoo; K Kolbert; G Sgouros; H Yeung; H Macapinlac; J Rosai; R J Robbins
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.958

5.  Tumor Treatment Response Based on Visual and Quantitative Changes in Global Tumor Glycolysis Using PET-FDG Imaging. The Visual Response Score and the Change in Total Lesion Glycolysis.

Authors:  Steven M. Larson; Yusuf Erdi; Timothy Akhurst; Madhu Mazumdar; Homer A. Macapinlac; Ronald D. Finn; Cecille Casilla; Melissa Fazzari; Neil Srivastava; Henry W.D. Yeung; John L. Humm; Jose Guillem; Robert Downey; Martin Karpeh; Alfred E. Cohen; Robert Ginsberg
Journal:  Clin Positron Imaging       Date:  1999-05

6.  Metabolic tumor volume predicts for recurrence and death in head-and-neck cancer.

Authors:  Trang H La; Edith J Filion; Brit B Turnbull; Jackie N Chu; Percy Lee; Khoa Nguyen; Peter Maxim; Andy Quon; Edward E Graves; Billy W Loo; Quynh-Thu Le
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Adenocarcinomas of the esophagus: response to chemoradiotherapy is associated with decrease of metabolic tumor volume as measured on PET-CT. Comparison to histopathologic and clinical response evaluation.

Authors:  Johannes B Roedl; Rivka R Colen; Nagaraj S Holalkere; Alan J Fischman; Noah C Choi; Michael A Blake
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2008-08-11       Impact factor: 6.280

8.  Prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume measured by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Seung Hyup Hyun; Joon Young Choi; Young Mog Shim; Kwhanmien Kim; Su Jin Lee; Young Seok Cho; Ji Young Lee; Kyung-Han Lee; Byung-Tae Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  The maximum uptake of (18)F-deoxyglucose on positron emission tomography scan correlates with survival, hypoxia inducible factor-1alpha and GLUT-1 in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Angela van Baardwijk; Christophe Dooms; Robert Jan van Suylen; Erik Verbeken; Monique Hochstenbag; Cary Dehing-Oberije; Dennis Rupa; Silvia Pastorekova; Sigrid Stroobants; Ulrich Buell; Philippe Lambin; Johan Vansteenkiste; Dirk De Ruysscher
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 10.  Chemotherapeutic management of stage IV non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Mark A Socinski; David E Morris; Gregory A Masters; Rogerio Lilenbaum
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.410

View more
  125 in total

1.  Independent prognostic value of whole-body metabolic tumor burden from FDG-PET in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Hao Zhang; Kristen Wroblewski; Daniel Appelbaum; Yonglin Pu
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Prognostic value of fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography parameters differs according to primary tumour location in small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Tomomi Nobashi; Sho Koyasu; Yuji Nakamoto; Takeshi Kubo; Takayoshi Ishimori; Young H Kim; Akihiko Yoshizawa; Kaori Togashi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  A comparison study of dual-energy spectral CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in primary tumors and lymph nodes of lung cancer.

Authors:  Osman Kupik; Yavuz Metin; Gülnihan Eren; Nurgul Orhan Metin; Medeni Arpa
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 2.630

4.  Whole-body metabolic tumour volume of 18F-FDG PET/CT improves the prediction of prognosis in small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jong-Ryool Oh; Ji-Hyoung Seo; Ari Chong; Jung-Joon Min; Ho-Chun Song; Young-Chul Kim; Hee-Seung Bom
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Risk-stratifying capacity of PET/CT metabolic tumor volume in stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Joshua H Finkle; Stephanie Y Jo; Mark K Ferguson; Hai-Yan Liu; Chenpeng Zhang; Xuee Zhu; Cindy Yuan; Yonglin Pu
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Nothing new under the nuclear sun: towards 80 years of theranostics in nuclear medicine.

Authors:  Frederik A Verburg; Alexander Heinzel; Heribert Hänscheid; Felix M Mottaghy; Markus Luster; Luca Giovanella
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Value of ¹⁸F-FDG uptake on PET/CT and CEA level to predict epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in pulmonary adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Kai-Hsiung Ko; Hsian-He Hsu; Tsai-Wang Huang; Hong-Wei Gao; Daniel H Y Shen; Wei-Chou Chang; Yi-Chih Hsu; Tsun-Hou Chang; Chi-Ming Chu; Ching-Liang Ho; Hung Chang
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  A new PET/CT volumetric prognostic index for non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Hao Zhang; Kristen Wroblewski; Yulei Jiang; Bill C Penney; Daniel Appelbaum; Cassie A Simon; Ravi Salgia; Yonglin Pu
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 5.705

9.  Metabolic tumour burden assessed by ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT associated with serum CA19-9 predicts pancreatic cancer outcome after resection.

Authors:  Hua-Xiang Xu; Tao Chen; Wen-Quan Wang; Chun-Tao Wu; Chen Liu; Jiang Long; Jin Xu; Ying-Jian Zhang; Run-Hao Chen; Liang Liu; Xian-Jun Yu
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 10.  PET in the management of locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC.

Authors:  Willem Grootjans; Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Esther G C Troost; Eric P Visser; Wim J G Oyen; Johan Bussink
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 66.675

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.