STUDY OBJECTIVES: Staging and classification in lung cancer are important for both patient management and clinical research. Results of survival after resection in patients with primary non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are analyzed in order to validate recent refinements of the staging system. DESIGN: Retrospective study; period from 1970 to 1992; follow-up > or = 5 years. PATIENTS: A total of 2,361 previously untreated patients who underwent resection for stage I, II, or IIIA primary NSCLC. MEASUREMENTS: Survival was estimated from the date of operation using the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis method. Deaths within 30 days of operation were excluded. Survival comparisons of different surgical-pathologic TNM classification (based on pathologic examination of resected specimens) as well as further discriminative factors were analyzed by log-rank test. RESULTS: Postoperative death occurred in 3.9% of patients. For survival analyses, 2,263 patients were included. The overall 5-year survival was 937/2,263 (41.4%). Five-year survival in stage IA was 255/404 (63%); in stage IB, 367/797 (46%); in stage IIA, 43/83 (52%); in stage IIB, 210/642 (33%); and in stage IIIA, 63/337 (19%). No significant difference in survival was demonstrated between stages IB and IIA. Until 4 years after surgery, age at operation did not influence survival; after 5 years, patients > 65 years old had a significantly lower survival. CONCLUSION: The TNM staging system accurately reflects the prognosis in primary NSCLC, but some stage definitions can be discussed. Despite the fact that the staging system is built on clinical data, the present analysis, which includes postsurgical data, confirms the similar survival of patients with T2N0M0 and T1N1M0. These results also stress the use of two separate substages, especially because these patients are offered surgery when possible.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Staging and classification in lung cancer are important for both patient management and clinical research. Results of survival after resection in patients with primary non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are analyzed in order to validate recent refinements of the staging system. DESIGN: Retrospective study; period from 1970 to 1992; follow-up > or = 5 years. PATIENTS: A total of 2,361 previously untreated patients who underwent resection for stage I, II, or IIIA primary NSCLC. MEASUREMENTS: Survival was estimated from the date of operation using the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis method. Deaths within 30 days of operation were excluded. Survival comparisons of different surgical-pathologic TNM classification (based on pathologic examination of resected specimens) as well as further discriminative factors were analyzed by log-rank test. RESULTS:Postoperative death occurred in 3.9% of patients. For survival analyses, 2,263 patients were included. The overall 5-year survival was 937/2,263 (41.4%). Five-year survival in stage IA was 255/404 (63%); in stage IB, 367/797 (46%); in stage IIA, 43/83 (52%); in stage IIB, 210/642 (33%); and in stage IIIA, 63/337 (19%). No significant difference in survival was demonstrated between stages IB and IIA. Until 4 years after surgery, age at operation did not influence survival; after 5 years, patients > 65 years old had a significantly lower survival. CONCLUSION: The TNM staging system accurately reflects the prognosis in primary NSCLC, but some stage definitions can be discussed. Despite the fact that the staging system is built on clinical data, the present analysis, which includes postsurgical data, confirms the similar survival of patients with T2N0M0 and T1N1M0. These results also stress the use of two separate substages, especially because these patients are offered surgery when possible.
Authors: Hao Zhang; Kristen Wroblewski; Yulei Jiang; Bill C Penney; Daniel Appelbaum; Cassie A Simon; Ravi Salgia; Yonglin Pu Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2015-04-09 Impact factor: 5.705
Authors: Ober van Gómez López; Ana María García Vicente; Antonio Francisco Honguero Martínez; Germán Andrés Jiménez Londoño; Carlos Hugo Vega Caicedo; Pablo León Atance; Ángel María Soriano Castrejón Journal: Transl Lung Cancer Res Date: 2015-06
Authors: Shengri Liao; Bill C Penney; Kristen Wroblewski; Hao Zhang; Cassie A Simon; Rony Kampalath; Ming-Chi Shih; Naoko Shimada; Sheng Chen; Ravi Salgia; Daniel E Appelbaum; Kenji Suzuki; Chin-Tu Chen; Yonglin Pu Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2011-09-23 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Alexander J Antoniou; Charles Marcus; Abdel K Tahari; Richard L Wahl; Rathan M Subramaniam Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2014-04-28 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Young Joo Lee; In Kyu Park; Moo-Suk Park; Hye Jin Choi; Byoung Chul Cho; Kyung Young Chung; Se Kyu Kim; Joon Chang; Jin Wook Moon; Hoguen Kim; Sung Ho Choi; Joo-Hang Kim Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2009-06-11 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Richard J Gralla; Martin J Edelman; Frank C Detterbeck; Thierry M Jahan; David M Loesch; Steven A Limentani; Ramaswamy Govindan; Guangbin Peng; Matthew J Monberg; Coleman K Obasaju; Mark A Socinski Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2008-09-10 Impact factor: 3.603