Literature DB >> 17850919

Ensuring the right PET scan for the right patient.

Stephen G Spiro1, John Buscombe, Gary Cook, Tim Eisen, Fergus Gleeson, Mary O'Brien, Michael D Peake, Nicholas P Rowell, Richard Seymour.   

Abstract

Guidelines issued by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) in the England and Wales recommend that rapid access to (18)F-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is made available to all appropriate patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The clinical evidence for the benefits of PET scanning in NSCLC is substantial, showing that PET has high accuracy, sensitivity and specificity for disease staging, as well as pre-therapeutic assessment in candidates for surgery and radical radiotherapy. Moreover, PET scanning can provide important information to assist in radiotherapy treatment planning, and has also been shown to correlate with responses to treatment and overall outcomes. If the government cancer waiting time targets are to be met, rapid referral from primary to secondary healthcare is essential, as is early diagnostic referral within secondary and tertiary care for techniques such as PET. Studies are also required to explore new areas in which PET may be of benefit, such as surveillance studies in high-risk patients to allow early diagnosis and optimal treatment, while PET scanning to identify treatment non-responders may help optimise therapy, with benefits both for patients and healthcare resource use. Further studies are needed into other forms of lung cancer, including small-cell lung cancer and mesothelioma. In conclusion, PET scanning has the potential to improve the diagnosis and management of lung cancer for many patients. Further studies and refinement of guidelines and procedures will maximise the benefit of this important technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17850919     DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2007.07.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lung Cancer        ISSN: 0169-5002            Impact factor:   5.705


  4 in total

1.  18F-FDG PET or PET-CT to evaluate prognosis for head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Peng Xie; Minghuan Li; Hanxi Zhao; Xindong Sun; Zheng Fu; Jinming Yu
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for predicting tumor response to radiochemotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Meng Su; Liang Zhao; Hangping Wei; Ruifang Lin; Xuebang Zhang; Changlin Zou
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2015-05-17       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 3.  A systematic review of PET and PET/CT in oncology: a way to personalize cancer treatment in a cost-effective manner?

Authors:  Astrid Langer
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET-CT metabolic index for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Peng Xie; Jin-Bo Yue; Han-Xi Zhao; Xin-Dong Sun; Li Kong; Zheng Fu; Jin-Ming Yu
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 4.553

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.