PURPOSE: We have previously reported that metabolic tumor volume (MTV) obtained from pretreatment (18)F-fluorodeoxydeglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET)/ computed tomography (CT) predicted outcome in patients with head-and-neck cancer (HNC). The purpose of this study was to validate these results on an independent dataset, determine whether the primary tumor or nodal MTV drives this correlation, and explore the interaction with p16(INK4a) status as a surrogate marker for human papillomavirus (HPV). METHODS AND MATERIALS: The validation dataset in this study included 83 patients with squamous cell HNC who had a FDG PET/CT scan before receiving definitive radiotherapy. MTV and maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) were calculated for the primary tumor, the involved nodes, and the combination of both. The primary endpoint was to validate that MTV predicted progression-free survival and overall survival. Secondary analyses included determining the prognostic utility of primary tumor vs. nodal MTV. RESULTS: Similarly to our prior findings, an increase in total MTV of 17 cm(3) (difference between the 75th and 25th percentiles) was associated with a 2.1-fold increase in the risk of disease progression (p = 0.0002) and a 2.0-fold increase in the risk of death (p = 0.0048). SUV(max) was not associated with either outcome. Primary tumor MTV predicted progression-free (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.94; p < 0.0001) and overall (HR = 1.57; p < 0.0001) survival, whereas nodal MTV did not. In addition, MTV predicted progression-free (HR = 4.23; p < 0.0001) and overall (HR = 3.21; p = 0.0029) survival in patients with p16(INK4a)-positive oropharyngeal cancer. CONCLUSIONS: This study validates our previous findings that MTV independently predicts outcomes in HNC. MTV should be considered as a potential risk-stratifying biomarker in future studies of HNC.
PURPOSE: We have previously reported that metabolic tumor volume (MTV) obtained from pretreatment (18)F-fluorodeoxydeglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET)/ computed tomography (CT) predicted outcome in patients with head-and-neck cancer (HNC). The purpose of this study was to validate these results on an independent dataset, determine whether the primary tumor or nodal MTV drives this correlation, and explore the interaction with p16(INK4a) status as a surrogate marker for human papillomavirus (HPV). METHODS AND MATERIALS: The validation dataset in this study included 83 patients with squamous cell HNC who had a FDG PET/CT scan before receiving definitive radiotherapy. MTV and maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) were calculated for the primary tumor, the involved nodes, and the combination of both. The primary endpoint was to validate that MTV predicted progression-free survival and overall survival. Secondary analyses included determining the prognostic utility of primary tumor vs. nodal MTV. RESULTS: Similarly to our prior findings, an increase in total MTV of 17 cm(3) (difference between the 75th and 25th percentiles) was associated with a 2.1-fold increase in the risk of disease progression (p = 0.0002) and a 2.0-fold increase in the risk of death (p = 0.0048). SUV(max) was not associated with either outcome. Primary tumorMTV predicted progression-free (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.94; p < 0.0001) and overall (HR = 1.57; p < 0.0001) survival, whereas nodal MTV did not. In addition, MTV predicted progression-free (HR = 4.23; p < 0.0001) and overall (HR = 3.21; p = 0.0029) survival in patients with p16(INK4a)-positive oropharyngeal cancer. CONCLUSIONS: This study validates our previous findings that MTV independently predicts outcomes in HNC. MTV should be considered as a potential risk-stratifying biomarker in future studies of HNC.
Authors: K Kian Ang; Jonathan Harris; Richard Wheeler; Randal Weber; David I Rosenthal; Phuc Felix Nguyen-Tân; William H Westra; Christine H Chung; Richard C Jordan; Charles Lu; Harold Kim; Rita Axelrod; C Craig Silverman; Kevin P Redmond; Maura L Gillison Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-06-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: James D Murphy; Trang H La; Karen Chu; Andrew Quon; Nancy J Fischbein; Peter G Maxim; Edward E Graves; Billy W Loo; Quynh-Thu Le Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-06-18 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Malik E Juweid; Sigrid Stroobants; Otto S Hoekstra; Felix M Mottaghy; Markus Dietlein; Ali Guermazi; Gregory A Wiseman; Lale Kostakoglu; Klemens Scheidhauer; Andreas Buck; Ralph Naumann; Karoline Spaepen; Rodney J Hicks; Wolfgang A Weber; Sven N Reske; Markus Schwaiger; Lawrence H Schwartz; Josee M Zijlstra; Barry A Siegel; Bruce D Cheson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-01-22 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Megan E Daly; Quynh-Thu Le; Anshu K Jain; Peter G Maxim; Annie Hsu; Billy W Loo; Michael J Kaplan; Nancy J Fischbein; A Dimitrios Colevas; Harlan Pinto; Daniel T Chang Journal: Head Neck Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: R Murakami; H Uozumi; T Hirai; R Nishimura; S Katsuragawa; S Shiraishi; R Toya; K Tashiro; K Kawanaka; N Oya; S Tomiguchi; Y Yamashita Journal: Acta Radiol Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 1.990
Authors: Chad Tang; Faina Kligman; Coby C Larsen; Kandice Kottke-Marchant; Roger E Marchant Journal: J Biomed Mater Res A Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 4.396
Authors: Benjamin J Moeller; Vishal Rana; Blake A Cannon; Michelle D Williams; Erich M Sturgis; Lawrence E Ginsberg; Homer A Macapinlac; J Jack Lee; K Kian Ang; K S Clifford Chao; Gregory M Chronowski; Steven J Frank; William H Morrison; David I Rosenthal; Randal S Weber; Adam S Garden; Scott M Lippman; David L Schwartz Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-03-30 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Adam A Garsa; Albert J Chang; Todd Dewees; Christopher R Spencer; Douglas R Adkins; Farrokh Dehdashti; Hiram A Gay; Wade L Thorstad Journal: J Radiat Oncol Date: 2013-03
Authors: Jeffrey M Vainshtein; Matthew E Spector; Jonathan B McHugh; Ka Kit Wong; Heather M Walline; Serena A Byrd; Christine M Komarck; Mohannad Ibrahim; Matthew H Stenmark; Mark E Prince; Carol R Bradford; Gregory T Wolf; Scott McLean; Francis P Worden; Douglas B Chepeha; Thomas Carey; Avraham Eisbruch Journal: Oral Oncol Date: 2014-02-22 Impact factor: 5.337
Authors: Christophe Van de Wiele; Vibeke Kruse; Peter Smeets; Mike Sathekge; Alex Maes Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2012-11-14 Impact factor: 9.236