Literature DB >> 22270174

Validation that metabolic tumor volume predicts outcome in head-and-neck cancer.

Chad Tang1, James D Murphy, Brian Khong, Trang H La, Christina Kong, Nancy J Fischbein, A Dimitrios Colevas, Andrei H Iagaru, Edward E Graves, Billy W Loo, Quynh-Thu Le.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We have previously reported that metabolic tumor volume (MTV) obtained from pretreatment (18)F-fluorodeoxydeglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET)/ computed tomography (CT) predicted outcome in patients with head-and-neck cancer (HNC). The purpose of this study was to validate these results on an independent dataset, determine whether the primary tumor or nodal MTV drives this correlation, and explore the interaction with p16(INK4a) status as a surrogate marker for human papillomavirus (HPV). METHODS AND MATERIALS: The validation dataset in this study included 83 patients with squamous cell HNC who had a FDG PET/CT scan before receiving definitive radiotherapy. MTV and maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) were calculated for the primary tumor, the involved nodes, and the combination of both. The primary endpoint was to validate that MTV predicted progression-free survival and overall survival. Secondary analyses included determining the prognostic utility of primary tumor vs. nodal MTV.
RESULTS: Similarly to our prior findings, an increase in total MTV of 17 cm(3) (difference between the 75th and 25th percentiles) was associated with a 2.1-fold increase in the risk of disease progression (p = 0.0002) and a 2.0-fold increase in the risk of death (p = 0.0048). SUV(max) was not associated with either outcome. Primary tumor MTV predicted progression-free (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.94; p < 0.0001) and overall (HR = 1.57; p < 0.0001) survival, whereas nodal MTV did not. In addition, MTV predicted progression-free (HR = 4.23; p < 0.0001) and overall (HR = 3.21; p = 0.0029) survival in patients with p16(INK4a)-positive oropharyngeal cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: This study validates our previous findings that MTV independently predicts outcomes in HNC. MTV should be considered as a potential risk-stratifying biomarker in future studies of HNC.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22270174      PMCID: PMC3337958          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.10.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  15 in total

Review 1.  HPV-associated head and neck cancer: a virus-related cancer epidemic.

Authors:  Shanthi Marur; Gypsyamber D'Souza; William H Westra; Arlene A Forastiere
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 41.316

2.  Human papillomavirus and survival of patients with oropharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  K Kian Ang; Jonathan Harris; Richard Wheeler; Randal Weber; David I Rosenthal; Phuc Felix Nguyen-Tân; William H Westra; Christine H Chung; Richard C Jordan; Charles Lu; Harold Kim; Rita Axelrod; C Craig Silverman; Kevin P Redmond; Maura L Gillison
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Postradiation metabolic tumor volume predicts outcome in head-and-neck cancer.

Authors:  James D Murphy; Trang H La; Karen Chu; Andrew Quon; Nancy J Fischbein; Peter G Maxim; Edward E Graves; Billy W Loo; Quynh-Thu Le
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Use of positron emission tomography for response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the Imaging Subcommittee of International Harmonization Project in Lymphoma.

Authors:  Malik E Juweid; Sigrid Stroobants; Otto S Hoekstra; Felix M Mottaghy; Markus Dietlein; Ali Guermazi; Gregory A Wiseman; Lale Kostakoglu; Klemens Scheidhauer; Andreas Buck; Ralph Naumann; Karoline Spaepen; Rodney J Hicks; Wolfgang A Weber; Sven N Reske; Markus Schwaiger; Lawrence H Schwartz; Josee M Zijlstra; Barry A Siegel; Bruce D Cheson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for locally advanced cancers of the larynx and hypopharynx.

Authors:  Megan E Daly; Quynh-Thu Le; Anshu K Jain; Peter G Maxim; Annie Hsu; Billy W Loo; Michael J Kaplan; Nancy J Fischbein; A Dimitrios Colevas; Harlan Pinto; Daniel T Chang
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.147

6.  Impact of FDG-PET/CT fused imaging on tumor volume assessment of head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma: intermethod and interobserver variations.

Authors:  R Murakami; H Uozumi; T Hirai; R Nishimura; S Katsuragawa; S Shiraishi; R Toya; K Tashiro; K Kawanaka; N Oya; S Tomiguchi; Y Yamashita
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.990

7.  Platelet and endothelial adhesion on fluorosurfactant polymers designed for vascular graft modification.

Authors:  Chad Tang; Faina Kligman; Coby C Larsen; Kandice Kottke-Marchant; Roger E Marchant
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.396

8.  Tumor volume in pharyngolaryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: comparison at CT, MR imaging, and FDG PET and validation with surgical specimen.

Authors:  Jean-François Daisne; Thierry Duprez; Birgit Weynand; Max Lonneux; Marc Hamoir; Hervé Reychler; Vincent Grégoire
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-08-18       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  The relationship between human papillomavirus status and other molecular prognostic markers in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Christina S Kong; Balasubramanian Narasimhan; Hongbin Cao; Shirley Kwok; Julianna P Erickson; Albert Koong; Nader Pourmand; Quynh-Thu Le
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Prospective risk-adjusted [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography assessment of radiation response in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Benjamin J Moeller; Vishal Rana; Blake A Cannon; Michelle D Williams; Erich M Sturgis; Lawrence E Ginsberg; Homer A Macapinlac; J Jack Lee; K Kian Ang; K S Clifford Chao; Gregory M Chronowski; Steven J Frank; William H Morrison; David I Rosenthal; Randal S Weber; Adam S Garden; Scott M Lippman; David L Schwartz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-03-30       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  42 in total

Review 1.  Present and future role of FDG-PET/CT imaging in the management of head and neck carcinoma.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kitajima; Yuko Suenaga; Kazuro Sugimura
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, diffusion-weighted MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT for the prediction of survival in oropharyngeal or hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with chemoradiation.

Authors:  Shu-Hang Ng; Chun-Ta Liao; Chien-Yu Lin; Sheng-Chieh Chan; Yu-Chun Lin; Tzu-Chen Yen; Joseph Tung-Chieh Chang; Sheung-Fat Ko; Kang-Hsing Fan; Hung-Ming Wang; Lan-Yan Yang; Jiun-Jie Wang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET metabolic parameters in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Adam A Garsa; Albert J Chang; Todd Dewees; Christopher R Spencer; Douglas R Adkins; Farrokh Dehdashti; Hiram A Gay; Wade L Thorstad
Journal:  J Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-03

4.  Refining risk stratification for locoregional failure after chemoradiotherapy in human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Vainshtein; Matthew E Spector; Jonathan B McHugh; Ka Kit Wong; Heather M Walline; Serena A Byrd; Christine M Komarck; Mohannad Ibrahim; Matthew H Stenmark; Mark E Prince; Carol R Bradford; Gregory T Wolf; Scott McLean; Francis P Worden; Douglas B Chepeha; Thomas Carey; Avraham Eisbruch
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 5.337

5.  Zone-size nonuniformity of 18F-FDG PET regional textural features predicts survival in patients with oropharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Nai-Ming Cheng; Yu-Hua Dean Fang; Li-yu Lee; Joseph Tung-Chieh Chang; Din-Li Tsan; Shu-Hang Ng; Hung-Ming Wang; Chun-Ta Liao; Lan-Yan Yang; Ching-Han Hsu; Tzu-Chen Yen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  The role of PET/CT in the management of patients affected by head and neck tumors: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Giovanni Cammaroto; Natale Quartuccio; Alessandro Sindoni; Francesca Di Mauro; Federico Caobelli
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 7.  Organ Preservation Protocols in T4 Laryngeal Cancer: a Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Narayana Subramaniam; Deepak Balasubramanian; Rithvik Reddy; Krishnakumar Thankappan; Subramania Iyer
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-12-01

8.  Integrating Tumor and Nodal Imaging Characteristics at Baseline and Mid-Treatment Computed Tomography Scans to Predict Distant Metastasis in Oropharyngeal Cancer Treated With Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Jia Wu; Micheal F Gensheimer; Nasha Zhang; Fei Han; Rachel Liang; Yushen Qian; Carrie Zhang; Nancy Fischbein; Erqi L Pollom; Beth Beadle; Quynh-Thu Le; Ruijiang Li
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  FDG-PET/CT imaging biomarkers in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Vasavi Paidpally; Alin Chirindel; Stella Lam; Nishant Agrawal; Harry Quon; Rathan M Subramaniam
Journal:  Imaging Med       Date:  2012-12

10.  Predictive and prognostic value of metabolic tumour volume and total lesion glycolysis in solid tumours.

Authors:  Christophe Van de Wiele; Vibeke Kruse; Peter Smeets; Mike Sathekge; Alex Maes
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.