Literature DB >> 11091106

Anatomy of SUV. Standardized uptake value.

S C Huang1.   

Abstract

Standardized uptake value (SUV) for [F-18]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) studies that is commonly used to differentiate malignant from benign tumors and to assess the efficacy of therapy is reviewed as a simplified calculation of the more general modeling approach. Based on such a basis, the merits and limitations of the SUV approach is examined with reference to literature reports on tumor uptake of FDG. Results indicate the complexity and large variation of glucose uptake mechanism in tumors. Consistently performed procedures and more basic studies are needed to improve the utility of FDG SUV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11091106     DOI: 10.1016/s0969-8051(00)00155-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucl Med Biol        ISSN: 0969-8051            Impact factor:   2.408


  153 in total

Review 1.  Measuring response to chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer: methodological considerations.

Authors:  Nanda C Krak; Otto S Hoekstra; Adriaan A Lammertsma
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-22       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Recommendations for the use of PET and PET-CT for radiotherapy planning in research projects.

Authors:  E J Somer; L C Pike; P K Marsden
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Role of Kinetic Modeling in Biomedical Imaging.

Authors:  Sung-Cheng Huang
Journal:  J Med Sci       Date:  2008

Review 4.  PET-guided delineation of radiation therapy treatment volumes: a survey of image segmentation techniques.

Authors:  Habib Zaidi; Issam El Naqa
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 5.  Brain fuel metabolism, aging, and Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Stephen Cunnane; Scott Nugent; Maggie Roy; Alexandre Courchesne-Loyer; Etienne Croteau; Sébastien Tremblay; Alex Castellano; Fabien Pifferi; Christian Bocti; Nancy Paquet; Hadi Begdouri; M'hamed Bentourkia; Eric Turcotte; Michèle Allard; Pascale Barberger-Gateau; Tamas Fulop; Stanley I Rapoport
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 4.008

6.  Scanning linear estimation: improvements over region of interest (ROI) methods.

Authors:  Meredith K Kupinski; Eric W Clarkson; Harrison H Barrett
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Measuring [(18)F]FDG uptake in breast cancer during chemotherapy: comparison of analytical methods.

Authors:  Nanda C Krak; Jacobus J M van der Hoeven; Otto S Hoekstra; Jos W R Twisk; Elsken van der Wall; Adriaan A Lammertsma
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  In vivo tumor grading of prostate cancer using quantitative 111In-capromab pendetide SPECT/CT.

Authors:  Youngho Seo; Carina Mari Aparici; Matthew R Cooperberg; Badrinath R Konety; Randall A Hawkins
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Practical method for radioactivity distribution analysis in small-animal PET cancer studies.

Authors:  Nikolai V Slavine; Peter P Antich
Journal:  Appl Radiat Isot       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 1.513

10.  PET/CT Assessment of Response to Therapy: Tumor Change Measurement, Truth Data, and Error.

Authors:  Paul E Kinahan; Robert K Doot; Michelle Wanner-Roybal; Luc M Bidaut; Samuel G Armato; Charles R Meyer; Geoffrey McLennan
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.243

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.