Literature DB >> 23503992

The Effects of Training on Recognition of Musical Instruments by Adults with Cochlear Implants.

Virginia D Driscoll1.   

Abstract

This study examines the efficiency and effectiveness of three types of training on recognition of musical instruments by adults with cochlear implants (CI). Seventy-one adults with CIs were randomly assigned to one of three training conditions: feedback on response accuracy, feedback-plus (response accuracy plus correct answer), and direct instruction. Each participant completed three training sessions per week over a five-week time period in which they listened to recorded excerpts of eight different musical instruments. Results showed significant pre-to-posttest improvement in music instrument recognition accuracy for all three training conditions (22.9-25.7%, p< 0.0001). Time when tested (week), bilateral CI use, and age were significant predictors of performance. Participants who wore bilateral implants scored significantly higher than participants with unilateral implants at all three time points; hearing aid use was not a significant predictor. These results may have practical implications for numerous types of auditory rehabilitation for persons who use CIs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory Rehabilitation; Cochlear Implant; Music; Training

Year:  2012        PMID: 23503992      PMCID: PMC3595548          DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1329230

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Hear        ISSN: 0734-0451


  19 in total

1.  Ability of nucleus cochlear implantees to recognize music.

Authors:  S Fujita; J Ito
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.547

Review 2.  Some effects of aging on central auditory processing.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Martin; James F Jerger
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug

3.  Melodic, rhythmic, and timbral perception of adult cochlear implant users.

Authors:  K Gfeller; C R Lansing
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1991-08

4.  Adapting to changed hearing: the potential role of formal training.

Authors:  Arthur Boothroyd
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  Characteristics and determinants of music appreciation in adult CI users.

Authors:  Birgit Philips; Bart Vinck; Eddy De Vel; Leen Maes; Wendy D'Haenens; Hannah Keppler; Ingeborg Dhooge
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Timbral recognition and appraisal by adult cochlear implant users and normal-hearing adults.

Authors:  K Gfeller; J F Knutson; G Woodworth; S Witt; B DeBus
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  Temporal stability of music perception and appraisal scores of adult cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Kate Gfeller; Dingfeng Jiang; Jacob J Oleson; Virginia Driscoll; John F Knutson
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  Melodic contour identification by cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu; Geraldine Nogaki
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Effects of training on recognition of musical instruments presented through cochlear implant simulations.

Authors:  Virginia D Driscoll; Jacob Oleson; Dingfeng Jiang; Kate Gfeller
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  Temporal processing and speech recognition in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2002-09-16       Impact factor: 1.837

View more
  9 in total

1.  A Randomized Controlled Crossover Study of the Impact of Online Music Training on Pitch and Timbre Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Nicole T Jiam; Mickael L Deroche; Patpong Jiradejvong; Charles J Limb
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-02-27

2.  The impact of electric hearing on children's timbre and pitch perception and talker discrimination.

Authors:  Kristin M Sjoberg; Virginia D Driscoll; Kate Gfeller; Anne E Welhaven; Karen Iler Kirk; Lindsay Prusick
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2017-01-18

3.  A preliminary report of music-based training for adult cochlear implant users: Rationales and development.

Authors:  Kate Gfeller; Emily Guthe; Virginia Driscoll; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2015-09

4.  Using the HISQUI29 to assess the sound quality levels of Spanish adults with unilateral cochlear implants and no contralateral hearing.

Authors:  Miryam Calvino; Javier Gavilán; Isabel Sánchez-Cuadrado; Rosa M Pérez-Mora; Elena Muñoz; Jesús Díez-Sebastián; Luis Lassaletta
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Comparison of Two Music Training Approaches on Music and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Christina D Fuller; John J Galvin; Bert Maat; Deniz Başkent; Rolien H Free
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  Frontal brain asymmetries as effective parameters to assess the quality of audiovisual stimuli perception in adult and young cochlear implant users.

Authors:  G Cartocci; A G Maglione; G Vecchiato; E Modica; D Rossi; P Malerba; P Marsella; A Scorpecci; S Giannantonio; F Mosca; C A Leone; R Grassia; F Babiloni
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.124

7.  The CI MuMuFe - A New MMN Paradigm for Measuring Music Discrimination in Electric Hearing.

Authors:  Bjørn Petersen; Anne Sofie Friis Andersen; Niels Trusbak Haumann; Andreas Højlund; Martin J Dietz; Franck Michel; Søren Kamaric Riis; Elvira Brattico; Peter Vuust
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Interactive Evaluation of a Music Preprocessing Scheme for Cochlear Implants Based on Spectral Complexity Reduction.

Authors:  Johannes Gauer; Anil Nagathil; Rainer Martin; Jan Peter Thomas; Christiane Völter
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Effect of Frequency Response Manipulations on Musical Sound Quality for Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Jonathan Mo; Nicole T Jiam; Mickael L D Deroche; Patpong Jiradejvong; Charles J Limb
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.