| Literature DB >> 19912640 |
Mauro Gacci1, Alchiede Simonato, Lorenzo Masieri, John L Gore, Michele Lanciotti, Annalisa Mantella, Mario Alberto Rossetti, Sergio Serni, Virginia Varca, Andrea Romagnoli, Carlo Ambruosi, Fabio Venzano, Marco Esposito, Tomaso Montanaro, Giorgio Carmignani, Marco Carini.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: After long term disease free follow up (FUp) patients reconsider quality of life (QOL) outcomes. Aim of this study is assess QoL in prostate cancer patients who are disease-free at least 5 years after radical prostatectomy (RP).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19912640 PMCID: PMC2784440 DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-7-94
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes ISSN: 1477-7525 Impact factor: 3.186
Clinical presentation and pathological findings of the 367 patients
| Overall | F.up 5 yy | F.up > 5 yy | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 367 | 60 | 307 | |
| 64.8 (66, 47-77) | 64.1 (65, 49-74) | 64.9 (66, 47-77) | |
| 89.7 (84, 60-156) | 60 | 95.5 (87, 61-156) | |
| 5 | 60 (16.3) | ||
| 6-7 | 146 (39.8) | ||
| 8-9 | 81 (22.1) | ||
| > 10 | 80 (21.8) | ||
| 14.6 (10.2, 0.8-87) | 12.8 (9, 3.9 - 63) | 15 (10.6, 0.8-87) | |
| <10 | 165 (45.0) | 34 (56.6) | 131 (42.7) |
| 10-20 | 134 (36.5) | 17 (28.3) | 121 (39.4) |
| >20 | 68 (18.5) | 9 (15.1) | 55 (17.9) |
| 2-6 | 154 (42.0) | 31 (51.7) | 123 (40.1) |
| 7 | 146 (39.8) | 19 (31.7) | 127 (41.3) |
| 8-10 | 67 (18.2) | 10 (16.6) | 57 (18.6) |
| 222 (60.5) | 40 (66.7) | 182 (59.3) | |
| 77 (21.0) | 13 (21.6) | 64 (20.8) | |
| 59 (16.1) | 6 (10) | 53 (17.3) | |
| 9 (2.4) | 1 (1.7) | 8 (2.6) | |
| 125 | 24 (19.2) | 101 (80.8) |
Univariate analysis of the whole study sample with Pearson correlation coefficients
| Timing | Tumor characteristics | Nerve-sparing | Hormone therapy | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pearson r | Age at RP | Follow-up duration | Age at follow-up | PSA | T-stage | Gleason score | ||
| -0.093 | -0.091 | 0.096 | ||||||
| -0.049 | -0.079 | -0.076 | -0.105 | |||||
| 0.061 | 0.050 | -0.033 | ||||||
Significant correlations (p ≤ 0.05) are in bold.
[UF: urinary function; UB: urinary bother; SF: sexual function; SB: sexual bother; RP: radical prostatectomy]
Multivariate analysis of the whole study sample with logistic regression model (forward, stepwise variable entry)
| Timing | Tumor characteristics | Nerve-sparing | Hormone therapy | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| r | Age at RP | Follow-up duration | Age at follow-up | PSA | T-stage | Gleason score | ||
| / | / | -3.557 | -3.103 | -2.878 | / | |||
| / | / | / | -2.944 | -2.272 | -3.718 | |||
| -1.304 | -0.229 | 0.176 | -1.104 | -2.106 | ||||
| / | 0.272 | / | / | -7.205 | ||||
Significant results (p ≤ 0.05) are in bold.
[UF: urinary function; UB: urinary bother; SF: sexual function; SB: sexual bother; RP: radical prostatectomy. [/: Not included for the multivariate analyses]]
Univariate and multivariate analyses of subjects treated with nerve-sparing RP without hormone treatment.
| Timing | Tumor characteristics | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| r | Age at RP | Follow-up duration | Age at follow-up | PSA | T-stage | Gleason score |
| -0.204 | -0.184 | 0.053 | -0.096 | |||
| 0.098 | 0.161 | 0.143 | -0.064 | -0.015 | -0.031 | |
| 1.841 | / | -3.138 | / | |||
Significant results (p ≤ 0.05) are in bold.
[SF: sexual function; SB: sexual bother./: Not included for the multivariate analyses]
Figure 1Mean UF, UB, SF, and SB scores in subjects who underwent NS-RP without HT (Group A - green bars) and non-NS-RP or NS-RP with HT subjects (Group B - red bars), stratified according to years of follow up. UF: urinary function; UB: urinary bother; SF: sexual function; SB: sexual bother. [* p < 0.05].
Figure 2Comparison of function and bother among Group A subjects at interval follow-up. The table reports Pearson correlation coefficients and p-values assessing the correlation between function and bother. Non-significant results (p > 0.05) are in bold. UF: urinary function; UB: urinary bother; SF: sexual function; SB: sexual bother; RP: radical prostatectomy.