Literature DB >> 26192132

Holding back, intimacy, and psychological and relationship outcomes among couples coping with prostate cancer.

Sharon L Manne1, David Kissane2, Talia Zaider2, Deborah Kashy3, David Lee4, Carolyn Heckman5, Shannon Myers Virtue1.   

Abstract

The present study evaluated intimacy as a mechanism for the effects of holding back sharing concerns about cancer on couples' psychological distress, well-being, and marital satisfaction using the actor-partner interdependence model (APIM), and evaluated 2 possible moderators of these associations: the number of patient and spouse cancer concerns. We had 139 men treated for localized prostate cancer in the past year and their spouses complete surveys about holding back sharing cancer concerns, intimacy, distress, and relationship satisfaction, as well as patient and spouse cancer concerns. APIM-indicated that the association between holding back sharing concerns, and patient and spouse distress, well-being, and relationship satisfaction could be partially accounted for by their influence on patient and spouse perceptions of relationship intimacy. The number of cancer concerns did not moderate the mediational model. Holding back has strong associations with both partners' well-being and distress. Holding back sharing concerns was particularly detrimental for couples' intimacy and relationship satisfaction. (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26192132      PMCID: PMC5225663          DOI: 10.1037/fam0000096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Psychol        ISSN: 0893-3200


  32 in total

1.  Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation.

Authors:  Scott E Maxwell; David A Cole
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2007-03

2.  Sex differences in self-silencing.

Authors:  L M Duarte; J M Thompson
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  1999-08

3.  A longitudinal analysis of intimacy processes and psychological distress among couples coping with head and neck or lung cancers.

Authors:  Sharon Manne; Hoda Badr; Deborah A Kashy
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2011-05-10

4.  5-year urinary and sexual outcomes after radical prostatectomy: results from the prostate cancer outcomes study.

Authors:  David F Penson; Dale McLerran; Ziding Feng; Lin Li; Peter C Albertsen; Frank D Gilliland; Ann Hamilton; Richard M Hoffman; Robert A Stephenson; Arnold L Potosky; Janet L Stanford
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Study of dyadic communication in couples managing prostate cancer: a longitudinal perspective.

Authors:  Lixin Song; Laurel L Northouse; Lingling Zhang; Thomas M Braun; Bernadine Cimprich; David L Ronis; Darlene W Mood
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 3.894

6.  Prospective comprehensive assessment of sexual function after retropubic non nerve sparing radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Alberto Trinchieri; Massimiliano Nicola; Francesca Masini; Barbara Mangiarotti
Journal:  Arch Ital Urol Androl       Date:  2005-12

7.  Problem-solving skills and emotional distress in spouses of men with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Vanessa L Malcarne; Rajni Banthia; James W Varni; Georgia Robins Sadler; Helen L Greenbergs; Celine M Ko
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  Cancer-related communication, relationship intimacy, and psychological distress among couples coping with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sharon Manne; Hoda Badr; Talia Zaider; Christian Nelson; David Kissane
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2009-12-06       Impact factor: 4.442

Review 9.  Intimacy and relationship processes in couples' psychosocial adaptation to cancer.

Authors:  Sharon Manne; Hoda Badr
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Social barriers to emotional expression and their relations to distress in male and female cancer patients.

Authors:  Sandra G Zakowski; Casey Harris; Nancy Krueger; Kimberly K Laubmeier; Susan Garrett; Robert Flanigan; Peter Johnson
Journal:  Br J Health Psychol       Date:  2003-09
View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Focusing on sexual rehabilitation besides penile rehabilitation following radical prostatectomy is important.

Authors:  Daphné Vanderhaeghe; Maarten Albersen; Emmanuel Weyne
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 2.  Predictors of Patient and Partner Satisfaction Following Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Cailey Guercio; Akanksha Mehta
Journal:  Sex Med Rev       Date:  2017-11-08

3.  Couple-focused interventions for men with localized prostate cancer and their spouses: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Sharon L Manne; Deborah A Kashy; Talia Zaider; David Kissane; David Lee; Isaac Y Kim; Carolyn J Heckman; Frank J Penedo; Evangelynn Murphy; Shannon Myers Virtue
Journal:  Br J Health Psychol       Date:  2019-03-10

4.  The Role of Response Perceptions in Couples' Ongoing Cancer-Related Disclosure.

Authors:  Kate Magsamen-Conrad; Maria K Venetis; Maria G Checton; Kathryn Greene
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2018-03-22

5.  Military Spouses' Self- and Partner-Directed Minimization in the Context of Deployment.

Authors:  Christina M Marini; Shelley MacDermid Wadsworth; Melissa M Franks; Steven R Wilson; Dave Topp; Sharon L Christ
Journal:  Mil Behav Health       Date:  2019-03-28

6.  The Roles of Dyadic Appraisal and Coping in Couples With Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Karen S Lyons; Lyndsey M Miller; Michael J McCarthy
Journal:  J Fam Nurs       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 3.818

7.  The relationship between holding back from communicating about breast concerns and anxiety in the year following breast biopsy.

Authors:  Caroline S Dorfman; Eneka Lamb; Alyssa Van Denburg; Anava A Wren; Mary Scott Soo; Kaylee Faircloth; Vicky Gandhi; Rebecca A Shelby
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2018-01-11

8.  Interpersonal processes and intimacy among men with localized prostate cancer and their partners.

Authors:  Sharon Manne; Deborah A Kashy; Talia Zaider; David Lee; Isaac Y Kim; Carolyn Heckman; Frank Penedo; David Kissane; Shannon Myers Virtue
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2018-05-17

9.  A Systematic Literature Review and Head-to-Head Comparison of Social Support and Social Constraint in Relation to the Psychological Functioning of Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Jessica N Rivera Rivera; Jessica L Burris
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2020-02-21

10.  Financial distress and its associated burden in couples coping with an advanced cancer.

Authors:  Juliet L Kroll; Seokhun Kim; Dalnim Cho; Shiao-Pei Weathers; Aileen B Chen; Grace Smith; Eduardo Bruera; Kathrin Milbury
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.