Literature DB >> 18585849

Satisfaction and regret after open retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Florian R Schroeck1, Tracey L Krupski, Leon Sun, David M Albala, Marva M Price, Thomas J Polascik, Cary N Robertson, Alok K Tewari, Judd W Moul.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To counsel patients adequately, it is important to understand the variables influencing satisfaction and regret following prostatectomy.
OBJECTIVE: To identify independent predictors for satisfaction and regret after radical prostatectomy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients who had undergone retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP) or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) between 2000 and 2007 were mailed cross-sectional surveys composed of sociodemographic information, the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC), and questions regarding satisfaction and regret. MEASUREMENTS: Sociodemographic variables, perioperative complications, type of procedure, length of follow-up, and EPIC scores were evaluated as independent predictors of satisfaction and regret in multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 400 patients responded (response rate 61%) of whom 84% were satisfied and 19% regretted their treatment choice. In multivariate analysis, lower income (odds ratio [OR], 0.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03-0.23), shorter follow-up (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.41-0.98), having undergone RRP versus RALP (OR, 4.45; 95% CI, 1.90-10.4)], urinary domain scores (OR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.60-4.54), and hormonal domain scores (OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.30-3.12) were independently associated with satisfaction (p< or =0.039). In terms of regret, RALP versus RRP (OR, 3.02; 95% CI, 1.50-6.07), lower urinary domain scores (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.37-0.91) and hormonal domain scores (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.45-0.98), and years since surgery (OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.13-2.36) were again predictive (p< or =0.041). African American race (OR, 3.58; 95% CI, 1.52-8.43) and lower bowel domain scores (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.55-0.97) were also independently associated with regret (p< or =0.028).
CONCLUSIONS: Sociodemographic variables and quality of life were important variables associated with satisfaction and regret. Patients who underwent RALP were more likely to be regretful and dissatisfied, possibly because of higher expectation of an "innovative" procedure. We suggest that urologists carefully portray the risks and benefits of new technologies during preoperative counseling to minimize regret and maximize satisfaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18585849     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.06.063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  92 in total

1.  [Life without robots : What is left for the urologist?].

Authors:  O Hakenberg
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Open Versus Laparoscopic Versus Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: The European and US Experience.

Authors:  Julia Finkelstein; Elisabeth Eckersberger; Helen Sadri; Samir S Taneja; Herbert Lepor; Bob Djavan
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2010

3.  Men's perspectives on selecting their prostate cancer treatment.

Authors:  Jinping Xu; Rhonda K Dailey; Susan Eggly; Anne Victoria Neale; Kendra L Schwartz
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.798

4.  Quality of life after radical prostatectomy: Continuing to improve on our track record.

Authors:  Garson Chan; Stephen E Pautler
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  [Diagnostics and therapy of localized prostate cancer: a problem-oriented account].

Authors:  C Weber
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Comparison of mid-term carcinologic control obtained after open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sarah J Drouin; Christophe Vaessen; Vincent Hupertan; Eva Comperat; Vincent Misraï; Alain Haertig; Marc-Olivier Bitker; Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler; François Richard; Morgan Rouprêt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Healthcare utilization in men with poorer sexual and urinary function recovery following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Peter A Elliott; George A Abdelsayed; Patrick S Kilday; Brian J Kim; Jeff M Slezak; Gary W Chien
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Analysis of postoperative pain in robotic versus traditional laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Authors:  Raymond E Betcher; James P Chaney; Pamela R Lacy; Stephen K Otey; Duke J Wood
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2013-07-03

9.  An evaluation of the timing of surgical complications following nephrectomy: data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP).

Authors:  Akshay Sood; Firas Abdollah; Jesse D Sammon; Victor Kapoor; Craig G Rogers; Wooju Jeong; Dane E Klett; Julian Hanske; Christian P Meyer; James O Peabody; Mani Menon; Quoc-Dien Trinh
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Early assessment of patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Eun Yong Choi; Jeongyun Jeong; Dong Il Kang; Kelly Johnson; Thomas Jang; Isaac Yi Kim
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2010-08-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.