Literature DB >> 29771551

Interpersonal processes and intimacy among men with localized prostate cancer and their partners.

Sharon Manne1, Deborah A Kashy2, Talia Zaider3, David Lee4, Isaac Y Kim5, Carolyn Heckman6, Frank Penedo7, David Kissane8, Shannon Myers Virtue9.   

Abstract

The present study focused on intimacy processes in the relationships of men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer and their partners. Using the actor-partner interdependence model (APIM), we examined the interpersonal process model of intimacy, which proposes associations between self- and perceived partner disclosure about cancer and perceived partner responsiveness as predictors of global relationship intimacy. The study's outcomes were patients' and spouses' ratings of global relationship intimacy. Both actor (my disclosure predicts my intimacy) and partner (my partner's disclosure predicts my intimacy) effects were examined, as well as possible moderating effects for cancer-related concerns. Two hundred and nine couples in which one or both partners reported elevated cancer-specific distress completed measures of self- and perceived partner disclosure and perceived partner responsiveness regarding discussions about prostate cancer, global relational intimacy, and cancer-related concerns. Results were consistent with the interpersonal process model of intimacy in that perceived responsiveness mediated the association between self- and perceived partner disclosure about cancer and global relational intimacy for both patients and spouses. Results also indicated moderation of the links between disclosure and relational intimacy by level of patient cancer-related concerns such that the links were stronger when concerns were higher. Finally, there was also evidence of moderated mediation such that indirect effects of disclosure on relational intimacy via perceived partner responsiveness were stronger when concerns were higher. Interventions for distressed couples coping with prostate cancer would benefit from focusing on facilitating disclosure and responsiveness, particularly among distressed couples who report cancer concerns. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29771551      PMCID: PMC6072581          DOI: 10.1037/fam0000404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Psychol        ISSN: 0893-3200


  27 in total

1.  The connubial crucible: newlywed years as predictors of marital delight, distress, and divorce.

Authors:  T L Huston; J P Caughlin; R M Houts; S E Smith; L J George
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2001-02

2.  Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation.

Authors:  Scott E Maxwell; David A Cole
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2007-03

3.  Intimacy as an interpersonal process: the importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges.

Authors:  J P Laurenceau; L F Barrett; P R Pietromonaco
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1998-05

4.  The interpersonal process model of intimacy: the role of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and partner responsiveness in interactions between breast cancer patients and their partners.

Authors:  Sharon Manne; Jamie Ostroff; Christine Rini; Kevin Fox; Lori Goldstein; Generosa Grana
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2004-12

5.  A longitudinal analysis of intimacy processes and psychological distress among couples coping with head and neck or lung cancers.

Authors:  Sharon Manne; Hoda Badr; Deborah A Kashy
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2011-05-10

6.  5-year urinary and sexual outcomes after radical prostatectomy: results from the prostate cancer outcomes study.

Authors:  David F Penson; Dale McLerran; Ziding Feng; Lin Li; Peter C Albertsen; Frank D Gilliland; Ann Hamilton; Richard M Hoffman; Robert A Stephenson; Arnold L Potosky; Janet L Stanford
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Study of dyadic communication in couples managing prostate cancer: a longitudinal perspective.

Authors:  Lixin Song; Laurel L Northouse; Lingling Zhang; Thomas M Braun; Bernadine Cimprich; David L Ronis; Darlene W Mood
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  Holding back, intimacy, and psychological and relationship outcomes among couples coping with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sharon L Manne; David Kissane; Talia Zaider; Deborah Kashy; David Lee; Carolyn Heckman; Shannon Myers Virtue
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2015-07-20

9.  Cancer-related communication, relationship intimacy, and psychological distress among couples coping with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sharon Manne; Hoda Badr; Talia Zaider; Christian Nelson; David Kissane
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2009-12-06       Impact factor: 4.442

10.  Prostate cancer: perspectives on quality of life and impact of treatment on patients and their partners.

Authors:  Helen Crowe; Anthony J Costello
Journal:  Urol Nurs       Date:  2003-08
View more
  6 in total

1.  Longitudinal course and predictors of communication and affect management self-efficacy among women newly diagnosed with gynecological cancers.

Authors:  Sharon L Manne; Deborah A Kashy; David W Kissane; Melissa Ozga; Shannon Myers Virtue; Carolyn J Heckman
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Dyadic effects of rumination and self-disclosure on posttraumatic growth in newly diagnosed gynecological cancer couples: an actor-partner interdependence modeling approach.

Authors:  Yuan-Yuan Song; Hui Liu; Song Wang; Xiao-Lian Jiang
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Daily partner responsiveness and everyday sleep outcomes in breast cancer survivors and their partners.

Authors:  Alyssa L Fenech; Christine Perndorfer; Emily C Soriano; Amy K Otto; Hannah A Brownlee; Michael Morreale; Scott D Siegel; Jean-Philippe Laurenceau
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 3.359

4.  Prostate Cancer Eligible for Radical Prostatectomy: Self-Esteem of Patients and Forms of Coping with Stress.

Authors:  Edyta Skwirczyńska; Oskar Wróblewski; Karol Tejchman; Piotr Ostrowski; Natalia Serwin
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Relationship communication and the course of psychological outcomes among couples coping with localised prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sharon L Manne; Deborah Kashy; Shannon Myers-Virtue; Talia Zaider; David W Kissane; Carolyn J Heckman; Isaac Kim; Frank Penedo; David Lee
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2021-02-14       Impact factor: 2.328

6.  Couples Adjusting to Multimorbidity: A Dyadic Study on Disclosure and Adjustment Disorder Symptoms.

Authors:  Andrea B Horn; Victoria S Boettcher; Barbara M Holzer; Klarissa Siebenhuener; Andreas Maercker; Edouard Battegay; Lukas Zimmerli
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-11-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.