OBJECTIVE:Cancer patients and partners often report inadequate communication about illness-related issues, although it is essential for mutual support and informal caregiving. This study examined the patterns of change in dyadic communication between patients with prostate cancer and their partners, and also determined if certain factors affected their communication over time. METHOD: Using multilevel modeling, this study analyzed longitudinal data obtained from a randomized clinical trial with prostate cancer patients and their partners, to examine their communication over time. Patients and partners (N=134 pairs) from the usual-care control group independently completedbaseline demographic assessment and measures of social support, uncertainty, symptom distress, and dyadic communication at baseline, and 4-, 8-, and 12-month follow-ups. RESULTS: The results indicated that (1) patients and partners reported similar levels of open communication at the time of diagnosis. Communication reported by patients and partners decreased over time in a similar trend, regardless of phase of illness; (2) phase of illness affected couples' open communication at diagnosis but not patterns of change over time; and (3) couples' perceived communication increased as they reported more social support, less uncertainty, and fewer hormonal symptoms in patients. Couples' demographic factors and general symptoms, and patients' prostate cancer-specific symptoms did not affect their levels of open communication. CONCLUSIONS: Perceived open communication between prostate cancer patients and partners over time is affected by certain baseline and time-varying psychosocial and cancer-related factors. The results provide empirical evidence that may guide the development of strategies to facilitate couples' interaction and mutual support during survivorship.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE:Cancerpatients and partners often report inadequate communication about illness-related issues, although it is essential for mutual support and informal caregiving. This study examined the patterns of change in dyadic communication between patients with prostate cancer and their partners, and also determined if certain factors affected their communication over time. METHOD: Using multilevel modeling, this study analyzed longitudinal data obtained from a randomized clinical trial with prostate cancerpatients and their partners, to examine their communication over time. Patients and partners (N=134 pairs) from the usual-care control group independently completed baseline demographic assessment and measures of social support, uncertainty, symptom distress, and dyadic communication at baseline, and 4-, 8-, and 12-month follow-ups. RESULTS: The results indicated that (1) patients and partners reported similar levels of open communication at the time of diagnosis. Communication reported by patients and partners decreased over time in a similar trend, regardless of phase of illness; (2) phase of illness affected couples' open communication at diagnosis but not patterns of change over time; and (3) couples' perceived communication increased as they reported more social support, less uncertainty, and fewer hormonal symptoms in patients. Couples' demographic factors and general symptoms, and patients' prostate cancer-specific symptoms did not affect their levels of open communication. CONCLUSIONS: Perceived open communication between prostate cancerpatients and partners over time is affected by certain baseline and time-varying psychosocial and cancer-related factors. The results provide empirical evidence that may guide the development of strategies to facilitate couples' interaction and mutual support during survivorship.
Authors: Jim C Hu; Eric P Elkin; David J Pasta; Deborah P Lubeck; Michael W Kattan; Peter R Carroll; Mark S Litwin Journal: J Urol Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Merle H Mishel; Barbara B Germino; Michael Belyea; Janet L Stewart; Donald E Bailey; James Mohler; Cary Robertson Journal: Nurs Res Date: 2003 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.381
Authors: Nicole Collaço; Carol Rivas; Lauren Matheson; Johana Nayoan; Richard Wagland; Obrey Alexis; Anna Gavin; Adam Glaser; Eila Watson Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-03-06 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Sharon L Manne; Deborah A Kashy; Talia Zaider; David Kissane; David Lee; Isaac Y Kim; Carolyn J Heckman; Frank J Penedo; Evangelynn Murphy; Shannon Myers Virtue Journal: Br J Health Psychol Date: 2019-03-10
Authors: Lixin Song; Christine Rini; Allison M Deal; Matthew E Nielsen; Hao Chang; Patty Kinneer; Randall Teal; David C Johnson; Mary W Dunn; Barbara Mark; Mary H Palmer Journal: Oncol Nurs Forum Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 2.172
Authors: Sharon Manne; Deborah A Kashy; Talia Zaider; David Lee; Isaac Y Kim; Carolyn Heckman; Frank Penedo; David Kissane; Shannon Myers Virtue Journal: J Fam Psychol Date: 2018-05-17