Literature DB >> 14764123

A low incidence of positive surgical margins in prostate cancer at high risk of extracapsular extension after a modified anterograde radical prostatectomy.

S Serni1, L Masieri, A Lapini, G Nesi, M Carini.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the incidence of positive surgical margins (and associated risk factors) in patients with localized prostate cancer at high preoperative risk of extracapsular disease treated using a modified anterograde radical retropubic prostatectomy technique. Positive surgical margins are an important risk factor for disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy, particularly in patients with extracapsular disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In total, 84 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer and a preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level > 10 ng/mL and/or a biopsy Gleason score > or = 7 were evaluated. The surgical technique allows easy, wide resection of the posterolateral prostatic pedicles, and good mobilization and exposure of the apex before the urethra transection. Prostatectomy specimens were examined for extracapsular tumour spread and positive surgical margins. Differences in putative risk factors (Gleason score, preoperative PSA level, prostate weight) between the positive- and negative-margin groups were evaluated using the Mann-Whitney test.
RESULTS: Overall, 11 of the 84 (13%) patients had positive surgical margins and of these a single site was involved in six. In total, 15 positive-margin sites were identified (five apical, four basal, three posterolateral, two anterior and one posterior). All patients with positive margins had histological extracapsular disease. The preoperative PSA level and Gleason score were significantly higher in the positive- than in the negative-margin group (P = 0.025 and 0.035, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: The anterograde radical prostatectomy minimizes the incidence of positive surgical margins in patients at high risk of extracapsular disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14764123     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2004.04602.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  3 in total

1.  Randomized trial comparing an anterograde versus a retrograde approach to open radical prostatectomy: results in terms of positive margin rate.

Authors:  Alessandro Sciarra; Cristiano Cristini; Magnus Von Heland; Stefano Salciccia; Vincenzo Gentile
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  A comparison of different oral therapies versus no treatment for erectile dysfunction in 196 radical nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy patients.

Authors:  A Natali; L Masieri; M Lanciotti; S Giancane; G Vignolini; M Carini; S Serni
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 2.896

3.  Urinary and sexual outcomes in long-term (5+ years) prostate cancer disease free survivors after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Mauro Gacci; Alchiede Simonato; Lorenzo Masieri; John L Gore; Michele Lanciotti; Annalisa Mantella; Mario Alberto Rossetti; Sergio Serni; Virginia Varca; Andrea Romagnoli; Carlo Ambruosi; Fabio Venzano; Marco Esposito; Tomaso Montanaro; Giorgio Carmignani; Marco Carini
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 3.186

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.