Literature DB >> 19906772

Attitudes towards biomedical use of tissue sample collections, consent, and biobanks among Finns.

Aaro Tupasela1, Sinikka Sihvo, Karolna Snell, Pa Jallinoja, Arja R Aro, Elina Hemminki.   

Abstract

AIMS: To ascertain the attitudes towards the use of existing diagnostic and research samples, the setting up of a national biobank, and different types of informed consent among Finns.
METHOD: A population survey of 2,400 randomly selected Finns aged 24-65 was conducted at the beginning of 2007.
RESULTS: A total of 1,195 responses (50%) were received after one reminder. Of the respondents, 83% said that they had little or no knowledge of what biobanks were. Despite this, 77% regarded the setting up of a national biobank in a positive light. One third (34%) would not attach any conditions on their consent, while 42% said that it was important to regain consent when the new study contains diverging steps. One third (30%) wanted consent to be regained for every new research project, and 44% would like to decide what type of research their samples would be used for if they were included in a national biobank. One third of both men and women approved of the use of their samples in research involving private enterprises.
CONCLUSIONS: In general, Finns were positive toward the setting up of a national biobank, as well as public-private partnerships, even though they considered their knowledge of biobanking to be limited. This, however, did not mean that they were indifferent to the use of their samples, but most wanted the ability to control how their samples are used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19906772     DOI: 10.1177/1403494809353824

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Public Health        ISSN: 1403-4948            Impact factor:   3.021


  35 in total

1.  Connecting the public with biobank research: reciprocity matters.

Authors:  Herbert Gottweis; George Gaskell; Johannes Starkbaum
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Publics and biobanks: Pan-European diversity and the challenge of responsible innovation.

Authors:  George Gaskell; Herbert Gottweis; Johannes Starkbaum; Monica M Gerber; Jacqueline Broerse; Ursula Gottweis; Abbi Hobbs; Ilpo Helén; Maria Paschou; Karoliina Snell; Alexandra Soulier
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Factors influencing public participation in biobanking.

Authors:  Mamoun Ahram; Areej Othman; Manal Shahrouri; Ebtihal Mustafa
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Public perspectives on biospecimen procurement: what biorepositories should consider.

Authors:  Jamie L'Heureux; Jeffrey C Murray; Elizabeth Newbury; Laura Shinkunas; Christian M Simon
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  Public perspectives regarding data-sharing practices in genomics research.

Authors:  S B Haga; J O'Daniel
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 2.000

6.  Biobanks and the phantom public.

Authors:  Herbert Gottweis; Haidan Chen; Johannes Starkbaum
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Demographic differences in willingness to provide broad and narrow consent for biobank research.

Authors:  Altovise T Ewing; Lori A H Erby; Juli Bollinger; Eva Tetteyfio; Luisel J Ricks-Santi; David Kaufman
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 2.300

8.  Biobanks, consent and claims of consensus.

Authors:  Zubin Master; Erin Nelson; Blake Murdoch; Timothy Caulfield
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 28.547

9.  Public support and consent preference for biomedical research and biobanking in Jordan.

Authors:  Mamoun Ahram; Areej Othman; Manal Shahrouri
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 4.246

10.  Development and validation of the biobanking attitudes and knowledge survey (BANKS).

Authors:  Kristen J Wells; Mariana Arevalo; Cathy D Meade; Clement K Gwede; Gwendolyn P Quinn; John S Luque; Gloria San Miguel; Dale Watson; Rebecca Phillips; Carmen Reyes; Margarita Romo; Jim West; Paul B Jacobsen
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.