Literature DB >> 21773770

Biobanks and the phantom public.

Herbert Gottweis1, Haidan Chen, Johannes Starkbaum.   

Abstract

This paper surveys the current state of knowledge about the relationship between different national publics and biobanks, how different publics perceive biobanks, and which issues are identified as important by various stakeholders. We discuss existing studies and emerging governance strategies dealing with the biobank-publics interface and argue that the search for phantom (biobank) public(s) is on, but still much needs to be done. We argue that the existing data originate in a relatively few regions, among them Northern Europe, the United Kingdom, and in certain U.S. states and are often based on survey research with small samples and short questionnaires. Combined usage of qualitative and quantitative methodology in studies is still rare though of great importance in order to investigate distributions of public opinion and also to be able to explain these patterns. Many important questions in the relationship between publics and biobanks are unexplored, or the existing data are inconsistent.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21773770     DOI: 10.1007/s00439-011-1065-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  31 in total

1.  'Science is really needed--that's all I know': informed consent and the non-verbal practices of collecting blood for genetic research in northern Sweden.

Authors:  Klaus Hoeyer
Journal:  New Genet Soc       Date:  2003-12

2.  Predicting intention to biobank: a national survey.

Authors:  Christine R Critchley; Dianne Nicol; Margaret F A Otlowski; Mark J A Stranger
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 3.367

3.  Research with stored biological samples: what do research participants want?

Authors:  Donna T Chen; Donald L Rosenstein; Palaniappan Muthappan; Susan G Hilsenbeck; Franklin G Miller; Ezekiel J Emanuel; David Wendler
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-03-28

4.  Gift relationships in genetics research.

Authors:  Richard Tutton
Journal:  Sci Cult (Lond)       Date:  2002-12

5.  The ethics of research using biobanks: reason to question the importance attributed to informed consent.

Authors:  Klaus Hoeyer; Bert-Ove Olofsson; Tom Mjörndal; Niels Lynöe
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-01-10

6.  Human tissue samples and ethics--attitudes of the general public in Sweden to biobank research.

Authors:  Tore Nilstun; Göran Hermerén
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2006

7.  Conflicting notions of personhood in genetic research.

Authors:  Klaus Hoyer
Journal:  Anthropol Today       Date:  2002-10

8.  Perceptions of potential donors in the Swedish public towards information and consent procedures in relation to use of human tissue samples in biobanks: a population-based study.

Authors:  Asa Kettis-Lindblad; Lena Ring; Eva Viberth; Mats G Hansson
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.021

9.  Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research.

Authors:  David J Kaufman; Juli Murphy-Bollinger; Joan Scott; Kathy L Hudson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Public trust in health care: the system or the doctor?

Authors:  M W Calnan; E Sanford
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-04
View more
  17 in total

1.  Publics and biobanks: Pan-European diversity and the challenge of responsible innovation.

Authors:  George Gaskell; Herbert Gottweis; Johannes Starkbaum; Monica M Gerber; Jacqueline Broerse; Ursula Gottweis; Abbi Hobbs; Ilpo Helén; Maria Paschou; Karoliina Snell; Alexandra Soulier
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  The art and science of biobanking.

Authors:  Bartha Maria Knoppers; Thomas J Hudson
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Power to the people: a wiki-governance model for biobanks.

Authors:  Edward S Dove; Yann Joly; Bartha M Knoppers
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 13.583

4.  Inclusion of residual tissue in biobanks: opt-in or opt-out?

Authors:  Noor A A Giesbertz; Annelien L Bredenoord; Johannes J M van Delden
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 8.029

5.  Current Status and Future Challenges of Biobank Research in Malaysia.

Authors:  Latifah Amin; Angelina Olesen; Zurina Mahadi; Maznah Ibrahim
Journal:  Asian Bioeth Rev       Date:  2021-03-31

6.  Constructing populations in biobanking.

Authors:  Aaro Tupasela; Karoliina Snell; Jose A Cañada
Journal:  Life Sci Soc Policy       Date:  2015-07-21

7.  'You should at least ask'. The expectations, hopes and fears of rare disease patients on large-scale data and biomaterial sharing for genomics research.

Authors:  Pauline McCormack; Anna Kole; Sabina Gainotti; Deborah Mascalzoni; Caron Molster; Hanns Lochmüller; Simon Woods
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  Engagement and social acceptance in genome editing for human benefit: Reflections on research and practice in a global context.

Authors:  Sebastián Barbosa; Léa Paré Toé; Delphine Thizy; Manjulika Vaz; Lucy Carter
Journal:  Wellcome Open Res       Date:  2020-10-16

9.  Fair Shares and Sharing Fairly: A Survey of Public Views on Open Science, Informed Consent and Participatory Research in Biobanking.

Authors:  Yann Joly; Gratien Dalpé; Derek So; Stanislav Birko
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Participant-Centric Initiatives: Tools to Facilitate Engagement In Research.

Authors:  Nicholas Anderson; Caleb Bragg; Andrea Hartzler; Kelly Edwards
Journal:  Appl Transl Genom       Date:  2012-12-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.