Literature DB >> 23921537

Factors influencing public participation in biobanking.

Mamoun Ahram1, Areej Othman2, Manal Shahrouri3, Ebtihal Mustafa1.   

Abstract

A diversity of public participation in biobanking is a highlight for the success of biobanks. It was previously reported that only two-thirds of Jordanians expressed interest in biobanking. To promote public involvement in a biobank, it is imperative to determine the aspects that influence the decision-making to participate. On the basis of a national survey involving 3196 respondents, the influence of 13 biobanking factors was assessed, including returning research results, privacy, freedom of choice, uncertainties about research, monetary and health considerations, and personal belief. Perception toward each factor was also correlated with willingness to participate in a biobank. A considerable number of respondents indicated returning research results as influential in their decision to become biobank donors. Interestingly, whereas the positive perception of availability of general results (39%) correlated with willingness to donate for biobanking, the negative view of unavailability of individualized results (47%) did not correlate with unwillingness. Religious permission of sample donation for research had the strongest positive influence (61%) and the highest correlation to participate among positively perceived factors. Unspecified research was highly indicated as a negative factor (45%), but did not correlate with unwillingness to become a biobank donor, whereas allowed withdrawal had a positive effect (31%) and correlation to contribute to biobanking. The negative perception of accessing medical information (9.5%) and re-contact (8.5%) had the strongest correlation with unwillingness to donate to a biobank. These results may provide an insight into how to formulate strategies to promote public participation in biomedical research and biobanking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23921537      PMCID: PMC3953902          DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  23 in total

1.  Research with stored biological samples: what do research participants want?

Authors:  Donna T Chen; Donald L Rosenstein; Palaniappan Muthappan; Susan G Hilsenbeck; Franklin G Miller; Ezekiel J Emanuel; David Wendler
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-03-28

2.  Arab science in the golden age (750-1258 C.E.) and today.

Authors:  Matthew E Falagas; Effie A Zarkadoulia; George Samonis
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Changing perspectives in biobank research: from individual rights to concerns about public health regarding the return of results.

Authors:  Joanna Stjernschantz Forsberg; Mats G Hansson; Stefan Eriksson
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Public perception and attitude of saudis toward organ and tissue donation.

Authors:  Mohammed A Al-Jumah; Mostafa A Abolfotouh
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  For what am I participating? The need for communication after receiving consent from biobanking project participants: experience in Japan.

Authors:  Maiko Watanabe; Yusuke Inoue; Chiungfang Chang; Hyunsoo Hong; Izumi Kobayashi; Satoshi Suzuki; Kaori Muto
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 3.172

6.  Public support and consent preference for biomedical research and biobanking in Jordan.

Authors:  Mamoun Ahram; Areej Othman; Manal Shahrouri
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  Public perception towards biobanking in jordan.

Authors:  Mamoun Ahram; Areej Othman; Manal Shahrouri
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.300

8.  Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research.

Authors:  David J Kaufman; Juli Murphy-Bollinger; Joan Scott; Kathy L Hudson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Simplifying informed consent for biorepositories: stakeholder perspectives.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Joëlle Y Friedman; N Chantelle Hardy; Li Lin; Kevin P Weinfurt
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Attitudes of the Japanese public and doctors towards use of archived information and samples without informed consent: preliminary findings based on focus group interviews.

Authors:  Atsushi Asai; Motoki Ohnishi; Etsuyo Nishigaki; Miho Sekimoto; Shunichi Fukuhara; Tsuguya Fukui
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2002-01-09       Impact factor: 2.652

View more
  30 in total

1.  Return of individual research results from genomic research: A systematic review of stakeholder perspectives.

Authors:  Danya F Vears; Joel T Minion; Stephanie J Roberts; James Cummings; Mavis Machirori; Mwenza Blell; Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne; Lorraine Cowley; Stephanie O M Dyke; Clara Gaff; Robert Green; Alison Hall; Amber L Johns; Bartha M Knoppers; Stephanie Mulrine; Christine Patch; Eva Winkler; Madeleine J Murtagh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Willingness of Older Canadians with HIV to Participate in HIV Cure Research Near and After the End of Life: A Mixed-Method Study.

Authors:  David Lessard; Karine Dubé; Martin Bilodeau; Patrick Keeler; Shari Margolese; Ron Rosenes; Liliya Sinyavskaya; Madeleine Durand; Erika Benko; Colin Kovacs; Charlotte Guerlotté; Wangari Tharao; Keresa Arnold; Renée Masching; Darien Taylor; José Sousa; Mario Ostrowski; Jeff Taylor; Andy Kaytes; Davey Smith; Sara Gianella; Nicolas Chomont; Jonathan B Angel; Jean-Pierre Routy; Éric A Cohen; Bertrand Lebouché; Cecilia T Costiniuk
Journal:  AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 1.723

3.  Perceptions of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases on biobanking.

Authors:  Millie D Long; R Jean Cadigan; Suzanne F Cook; Kaaren Haldeman; Kriste Kuczynski; Robert S Sandler; Christopher F Martin; Wenli Chen; Michael D Kappelman
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.325

4.  Broad consent in practice: lessons learned from a hospital-based biobank for prospective research on genomic and medical data.

Authors:  Gaia Barazzetti; Francesca Bosisio; Daria Koutaissoff; Brenda Spencer
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  Current Status and Future Challenges of Biobank Research in Malaysia.

Authors:  Latifah Amin; Angelina Olesen; Zurina Mahadi; Maznah Ibrahim
Journal:  Asian Bioeth Rev       Date:  2021-03-31

6.  Opportunities to Improve Women's Health: Engaging Racial/Ethnic Diverse Women to Provide Biospecimens for Research.

Authors:  Megan C Edmonds; Arnethea L Sutton; Yvonne Cummings; Vanessa B Sheppard
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 3.017

7.  Public's attitudes on participation in a biobank for research: an Italian survey.

Authors:  Corinna Porteri; Patrizio Pasqualetti; Elena Togni; Michael Parker
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 2.652

8.  Beyond Our Borders? Public Resistance to Global Genomic Data Sharing.

Authors:  Mary A Majumder; Robert Cook-Deegan; Amy L McGuire
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Associations between the Willingness to Donate Samples to Biobanks and Selected Psychological Variables.

Authors:  Jakub Pawlikowski; Michał Wiechetek; Anita Majchrowska
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Planning Today for Tomorrow's Research: Analysis of Factors Influencing Participation in a Pediatric Cancer Research Biorepository.

Authors:  Rania M Labib; Omneya Hassanain; Maram Alaa; Safaa Ahmed; Sherif Abou El-Naga
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.