Literature DB >> 19894052

The concurrence of histologically positive resection margins and sessile morphology is an important risk factor for lymph node metastasis after complete endoscopic removal of malignant colorectal polyps.

Lars Boenicke1, Martin Fein, Marco Sailer, Christoph Isbert, Christoph-Tomas Germer, Andreas Thalheimer.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The optimal procedure to be followed after colonoscopic polypectomy of malignant colorectal polyps with nontumour-free resection margins at histology is a matter of controversy. While some authors recommend merely local or segmental follow-up resection, others favour an oncological resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred five patients, each with a single malignant polyp, were investigated. Patients with a macroscopically evident malignant polyp and those in whom the endoscopist reported incomplete polypectomy were excluded from the study.
RESULTS: Postpolypectomy morbidity was 4%, and postoperative was 14%. In only 39 cases were the resection margins adjudged to be tumour-free. Histology following subsequent surgery or the follow-up examinations revealed a local recurrence or residual carcinoma at the polypectomy site in only three (2.8%) cases and lymph node metastasis in eight (7.6%) cases. Five patients had remnant adenoma at the polypectomy site. Of the high-risk factors, histological incomplete removal (n = 66, p = 0.04, odds ratio (OR) 10.2) and lymph vessel infiltration (n = 7, p = 0.02, OR 9.2) revealed a significant correlation with lymph node metastasis, but not with remnant tumour. In the case of sessile polyp, the assessment of histological incomplete removal was highly significantly correlated with lymph node metastasis (n = 55, p = 0.007, OR 18.1).
CONCLUSIONS: Polypectomy artefacts appear to be responsible for the discrepancy between histology and the tumour remnants actually present. On the other hand, histologically incompletely removed sessile malignant polyps represent an appreciably higher risk for lymph node metastasis. Such cases should, therefore, be submitted to further oncological resection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19894052     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-009-0836-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  24 in total

1.  Endoscopic removal of large colorectal polyps: prevention of unnecessary surgery?

Authors:  J Marek Doniec; Mathias S Löhnert; Bodo Schniewind; Frank Bokelmann; Bernd Kremer; Horst Grimm
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Histologic risk factors and clinical outcome in colorectal malignant polyp: a pooled-data analysis.

Authors:  Cesare Hassan; Angelo Zullo; Mauro Risio; Francesco P Rossini; Sergio Morini
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Insulated-tip knife endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal polyps unsuitable for standard polypectomy.

Authors:  Alessandro Repici; Massimo Conio; Claudio De Angelis; Anna Sapino; Alberto Malesci; Alberto Arezzo; Cristina Hervoso; Rinaldo Pellicano; Salvatore Comunale; Mario Rizzetto
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-03-31       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: clinical and functional results.

Authors:  G Dafnis; L Påhlman; Y Raab; U-M Gustafsson; W Graf
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.788

5.  The risk of lymph node metastasis in colorectal polyps with invasive adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  S Nivatvongs; A Rojanasakul; H M Reiman; R R Dozois; B G Wolff; J H Pemberton; R W Beart; L F Jacques
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 6.  Surgical excision of large rectal villous adenomas.

Authors:  C B Whitlow; D E Beck; J B Gathright
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.495

7.  Salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection for residual or local recurrent intraepithelial neoplasia in the colorectum: a prospective analysis.

Authors:  D P Hurlstone; A J Shorthouse; S R Brown; N Tiffin; S S Cross
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 3.788

8.  Prognostic factors in colorectal carcinomas arising in adenomas: implications for lesions removed by endoscopic polypectomy.

Authors:  R C Haggitt; R E Glotzbach; E E Soffer; L D Wruble
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Endoscopic snare resection of large colonic polyps: how far can we go?

Authors:  N Stergiou; A Riphaus; P Lange; D Menke; F Köckerling; T Wehrmann
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2002-11-16       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Can depth of tumour invasion predict lymph node positivity in patients undergoing resection for early rectal cancer? A comparative study between T1 and T2 cancers.

Authors:  S Rasheed; D M Bowley; O Aziz; P P Tekkis; A E Sadat; T Guenther; M L Boello; P J McDonald; I C Talbot; J M A Northover
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.788

View more
  10 in total

1.  Role of Endoscopic Resection Versus Surgical Resection in Management of Malignant Colon Polyps: a National Cancer Database Analysis.

Authors:  Dhruv Lowe; Sheikh Saleem; Muhammad Osman Arif; Shreya Sinha; Gary Brooks
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Polyp morphology: an interobserver evaluation for the Paris classification among international experts.

Authors:  Sascha C van Doorn; Y Hazewinkel; James E East; Monique E van Leerdam; Amit Rastogi; Maria Pellisé; Silvia Sanduleanu-Dascalescu; Barbara A J Bastiaansen; Paul Fockens; Evelien Dekker
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 3.  Management of Rectal Polyps.

Authors:  Michelle L Cowan; Matthew L Silviera
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2016-12

Review 4.  Clinical outcome of low- and high-risk malignant colorectal polyps: results of a population-based study and meta-analysis of the available literature.

Authors:  Carmela Di Gregorio; Luca Reggiani Bonetti; Carmela de Gaetani; Monica Pedroni; Shaniko Kaleci; Maurizio Ponz de Leon
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 3.397

5.  Additional colectomy after colonoscopic polypectomy for T1 colon cancer: a fine balance between oncologic benefit and operative risk.

Authors:  Emmanuel I Benizri; Jean-Marc Bereder; Amine Rahili; Jean-Louis Bernard; Geoffroy Vanbiervliet; Jérôme Filippi; Xavier Hébuterne; Daniel Benchimol
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Factors predicting occurrence and therapeutic choice in malignant colorectal polyps: a study of 13 years of colonoscopic polypectomy.

Authors:  Sergiu Marian Cazacu; Adrian Săftoiu; Sevastiţa Iordache; Mirela Corina Ghiluşi; Claudia Valentina Georgescu; Vlad Florin Iovănescu; Carmen Daniela Neagoe; Liliana Streba; Mihaela Caliţa; Elena Daniela Burtea; Dan Cârţu; Polliana Mihaela Leru
Journal:  Rom J Morphol Embryol       Date:  2021 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 0.833

7.  Novel risk factors for lymph node metastasis in early invasive colorectal cancer: a multi-institution pathology review.

Authors:  Hideki Ueno; Kazuo Hase; Yojiro Hashiguchi; Hideyuki Shimazaki; Shinji Yoshii; Shin-ei Kudo; Masafumi Tanaka; Yoshito Akagi; Takeshi Suto; Shinji Nagata; Keiji Matsuda; Koji Komori; Kazuhiko Yoshimatsu; Yasuhiko Tomita; Shozo Yokoyama; Eiji Shinto; Takahiro Nakamura; Kenichi Sugihara
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 7.527

8.  Risk factors of recurrence in T1 colorectal cancers treated by endoscopic resection alone or surgical resection with lymph node dissection.

Authors:  Yuta Kouyama; Shin-Ei Kudo; Hideyuki Miyachi; Katsuro Ichimasa; Shingo Matsudaira; Masashi Misawa; Yuichi Mori; Toyoki Kudo; Takemasa Hayashi; Kunihiko Wakamura; Fumio Ishida; Shigeharu Hamatani
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Increased Rate of Incidental Colorectal Malignant Polyps: A Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  T Buchbjerg; R Kroijer; I Al-Najami; K Urth Hansen; G Baatrup
Journal:  Surg Res Pract       Date:  2018-04-23

10.  Assessment of colon polyp morphology: Is education effective?

Authors:  Jae Hyun Kim; Kyoung Sik Nam; Hye Jung Kwon; Youn Jung Choi; Kyoungwon Jung; Sung Eun Kim; Won Moon; Moo In Park; Seun Ja Park
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.