Literature DB >> 17403075

Insulated-tip knife endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal polyps unsuitable for standard polypectomy.

Alessandro Repici1, Massimo Conio, Claudio De Angelis, Anna Sapino, Alberto Malesci, Alberto Arezzo, Cristina Hervoso, Rinaldo Pellicano, Salvatore Comunale, Mario Rizzetto.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) has been shown to be safe and effective. En bloc resection is often not achieved using conventional EMR. Insulated-tip knife (It-knife) EMR has been recently proposed for early gastric cancer dissection and removal. This study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy in obtaining en bloc resection with It-knife EMR of large colonic lesions not resectable with standard endoscopic techniques.
METHODS: A total of 29 patients (19 men, 10 women, mean age 67.5 yr, range 44-88) were included in the study. Lesions were considered not suitable for standard polypectomy because of large diameter (>3 cm), morphology, and/or position. Lesions were located in the rectum (N = 11), sigmoid: (N = 10), descending: (N = 4), transverse: (N = 2), and hepatic flexure (N = 2). After saline injection, circumferential incision and dissection of the lesions were attempted with the aim of achieving en bloc resection.
RESULTS: En bloc resection was achieved in only 55.1% of the lesions (16 out of 29 patients). In the remaining cases, resection was completed with a piecemeal technique. The median size of the en bloc resected specimen was 3 x 3.4 cm. Complications occurred in four patients (13.7%). At histopathology, 13 patients had low-grade dysplasia, 15 high-grade dysplasia. One patient had a tumor invading the submucosa and was submitted to surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: It-knife EMR is a promising technique for attempting en bloc resection of large colonic polyps. Adequate training and caution are required because it can be associated with a higher complication rate than with other EMR modalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17403075     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01198.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  13 in total

1.  Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection as treatments for early gastrointestinal cancers in Western countries.

Authors:  Sergio Coda; Sun-Young Lee; Takuji Gotoda
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2007-06-30       Impact factor: 4.519

2.  Endoscopic resection of sporadic duodenal adenomas: comparison of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) techniques and the risks of late delayed bleeding.

Authors:  Peter John Basford; Regi George; Emma Nixon; Tehreem Chaudhuri; Rob Mead; Pradeep Bhandari
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Outcome of EMR as an alternative to surgery in patients with complex colon polyps.

Authors:  Gottumukkala S Raju; Phillip J Lum; William A Ross; Selvi Thirumurthi; Ethan Miller; Patrick M Lynch; Jeffrey H Lee; Manoop S Bhutani; Mehnaz A Shafi; Brian R Weston; Mala Pande; Robert S Bresalier; Asif Rashid; Lopa Mishra; Marta L Davila; John R Stroehlein
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 4.  Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection in esophageal and gastric cancers.

Authors:  Kenneth K Wang; Ganapathy Prasad; Jianmin Tian
Journal:  Curr Opin Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.287

5.  Rectal laterally spreading tumors successfully treated in two steps by endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection.

Authors:  Italo Stroppa; Giovanni Milito; Raffaella Lionetti; Giovanni Palmieri; Federica Cadeddu; Francesco Pallone
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  Endoscopic resection of superficial gastrointestinal tumors.

Authors:  Giovannini Marc; Cesar Vivian Lopes
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  ESD training: A challenging path to excellence.

Authors:  Alberto Herreros de Tejada
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-04-16

8.  The concurrence of histologically positive resection margins and sessile morphology is an important risk factor for lymph node metastasis after complete endoscopic removal of malignant colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Lars Boenicke; Martin Fein; Marco Sailer; Christoph Isbert; Christoph-Tomas Germer; Andreas Thalheimer
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 9.  Training methods and models for colonoscopic insertion, endoscopic mucosal resection, and endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Authors:  Naohisa Yoshida; Nilesh Fernandopulle; Yutaka Inada; Yuji Naito; Yoshito Itoh
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 10.  Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection from a Western perspective: Today's promises and future challenges.

Authors:  José Carlos Marín-Gabriel; Gloria Fernández-Esparrach; José Díaz-Tasende; Alberto Herreros de Tejada
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-01-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.