Literature DB >> 12626909

Endoscopic removal of large colorectal polyps: prevention of unnecessary surgery?

J Marek Doniec1, Mathias S Löhnert, Bodo Schniewind, Frank Bokelmann, Bernd Kremer, Horst Grimm.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Because of the potential risk of malignancy and technical difficulties in achieving complete removal, large colorectal polyps represent a special problem for the endoscopist. The aim of this study was to evaluate the capabilities and risks of endoscopy in complete removal of large colorectal polyps.
METHODS: Endoscopic polypectomy of 186 colorectal polyps larger than 3 cm in diameter (range, 3-13 cm) was performed; 141 were sessile and 45 pedunculated. Most of the polyps were located in the rectum (n = 88), sigmoid (n = 63), and cecum (n = 9). The remaining adenomas were situated in other parts of the colon. Sessile polyps were removed using the piecemeal technique.
RESULTS: Histology results showed an adenoma in 167 cases, and invasive carcinoma was present in the adenoma in 19 patients. Of the adenomas, 29 were tubulous, 118 tubulovillous, and 20 villous; adenoma with severe dysplasia was found in 49 cases. Complete endoscopic removal was achieved in all sessile and pedunculated polyps. None of the patients with invasive carcinoma who underwent surgical resection (n = 10) had any evidence of tumor in the resected specimen. Bleeding occurred in 4 patients after polypectomy (2 percent). Perforation occurred in 1 patient (0.5 percent), who had an invasive carcinoma of the cecum. There was no procedure-related mortality. During a mean follow-up period of 40 (range, 3-87) months, 6 patients presented with recurrence of a benign adenoma (3 percent), which was treated endoscopically, and 1 patient presented with a recurrent invasive carcinoma, which was treated surgically.
CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic polypectomy is a safe and effective method of treating large colorectal polyps.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12626909     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-6553-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  35 in total

1.  Recurrence after endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection for large sessile colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Guh Jung Seo; Dae Kyung Sohn; Kyung Su Han; Chang Won Hong; Byung Chang Kim; Ji Won Park; Hyo Seong Choi; Hee Jin Chang; Jae Hwan Oh
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Endoscopic mucosal resection: who and how?

Authors:  Jayan Mannath; Krish Ragunath
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.409

3.  Endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal polyps in typical UK hospitals.

Authors:  Teegan R Lim; Venkat Mahesh; Salil Singh; Benjamin H L Tan; Mohamed Elsadig; Nerukav Radhakrishnan; Phil Conlong; Chris Babbs; Regi George
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Predictive factors for complications in endoscopic resection of large colorectal lesions: a multicenter prospective study.

Authors:  Yoshiki Wada; Shin-ei Kudo; Shinji Tanaka; Yutaka Saito; Hiroyasu Iishii; Hiroaki Ikematsu; Masahiro Igarashi; Yusuke Saitoh; Yuji Inoue; Kiyonori Kobayashi; Takashi Hisabe; Osamu Tsuruta; Hiroshi Kashida; Hideki Ishikawa; Kenichi Sugihara
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Techniques for difficult polypectomy.

Authors:  Douglas B Nelson
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2004-10-25

6.  Transabdominal transcolonic polypectomy.

Authors:  Edward Alexander Schmitt
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Hydroxy-propyl-methyl-cellulose is a safe and effective lifting agent for endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal polyps.

Authors:  A Arezzo; N Pagano; F Romeo; G Delconte; C Hervoso; M Morino; A Repici
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Prospective Analysis of Minor Adverse Events After Colon Polypectomy.

Authors:  Soo-Kyung Park; Min-Gu Lee; Seok Hyeon Jeong; Hyo-Joon Yang; Yoon Suk Jung; Kyu Yong Choi; Hungdai Kim; Hyung Ook Kim; Kyung Uk Jeong; Ho-Kyung Chun; Dong Il Park
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 9.  [Colorectal adenoma: pro conventional/laparoscopic resection].

Authors:  S Rüth; J Spatz; M Anthuber
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 0.955

10.  Risk factors for delayed postpolypectomy bleeding: how to minimize your patients' risk.

Authors:  Xian-rui Wu; James M Church; Awad Jarrar; Jennifer Liang; Matthew F Kalady
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.