PURPOSE: The treatment of early-stage colorectal cancers removed endoscopically depends on histopathologic findings. This study aimed to assess the benefit-risk balance for patients who underwent additional surgery after endoscopic resection of a T1 carcinoma with unfavorable histology. METHODS: From 2000 to 2010, 64 consecutive patients were included in this retrospective study. Specimens resected after endoscopic polypectomy showed at least one of the following unfavorable factors: no free margin, lymphovascular invasion, poorly differentiated grade, SM2-3 involvement (submucosal invasion greater than 300 μm from the muscularis mucosae), tumor budding, sessile morphology, and piecemeal resection. The main objective was to assess the benefit-risk balance of an oncological resection performed after the polypectomy. Oncological benefit was measured by the lymph node metastasis rate and the persistence of a residual adenocarcinoma on the specimen. The risk was measured by the occurrence of severe complications of grade III-IV or death. The associations between these end points and clinicopathologic variables were evaluated by univariate analysis and logistic regression. RESULTS: Five patients (7.8 %) had lymph node metastases and two (3.1 %) had residual carcinomas. Eight patients (12.5 %) had grade III-IV morbidity. There were no deaths. Oncological benefit was associated by logistic regression analysis with patients who presented multiple criteria (≥2) that led to surgery (p = 0.031). The benefit-risk balance was favorable only for those patients. CONCLUSIONS: Additional surgery is required for patients who present multiple adverse histological criteria. If only one criterion is selected, the indication should be discussed, especially for patients with multiple comorbidities.
PURPOSE: The treatment of early-stage colorectal cancers removed endoscopically depends on histopathologic findings. This study aimed to assess the benefit-risk balance for patients who underwent additional surgery after endoscopic resection of a T1 carcinoma with unfavorable histology. METHODS: From 2000 to 2010, 64 consecutive patients were included in this retrospective study. Specimens resected after endoscopic polypectomy showed at least one of the following unfavorable factors: no free margin, lymphovascular invasion, poorly differentiated grade, SM2-3 involvement (submucosal invasion greater than 300 μm from the muscularis mucosae), tumor budding, sessile morphology, and piecemeal resection. The main objective was to assess the benefit-risk balance of an oncological resection performed after the polypectomy. Oncological benefit was measured by the lymph node metastasis rate and the persistence of a residual adenocarcinoma on the specimen. The risk was measured by the occurrence of severe complications of grade III-IV or death. The associations between these end points and clinicopathologic variables were evaluated by univariate analysis and logistic regression. RESULTS: Five patients (7.8 %) had lymph node metastases and two (3.1 %) had residual carcinomas. Eight patients (12.5 %) had grade III-IV morbidity. There were no deaths. Oncological benefit was associated by logistic regression analysis with patients who presented multiple criteria (≥2) that led to surgery (p = 0.031). The benefit-risk balance was favorable only for those patients. CONCLUSIONS: Additional surgery is required for patients who present multiple adverse histological criteria. If only one criterion is selected, the indication should be discussed, especially for patients with multiple comorbidities.
Authors: S Nivatvongs; A Rojanasakul; H M Reiman; R R Dozois; B G Wolff; J H Pemberton; R W Beart; L F Jacques Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 1991-04 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: H S Cooper; L M Deppisch; W K Gourley; E I Kahn; R Lev; P N Manley; R R Pascal; A H Qizilbash; R R Rickert; J F Silverman Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 1995-06 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Lars Boenicke; Martin Fein; Marco Sailer; Christoph Isbert; Christoph-Tomas Germer; Andreas Thalheimer Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2009-11-06 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Ronan A Cahill; Andreas Bembenek; Saad Sirop; Deirdre F Waterhouse; Wolfgang Schneider; Joel Leroy; David Wiese; Thomas Beutler; Anton Bilchik; Sukamal Saha; Peter M Schlag Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2009-05-27 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Kim M Gijsbers; Lisa van der Schee; Tessa van Veen; Annemarie M van Berkel; Femke Boersma; Carolien M Bronkhorst; Paul D Didden; Krijn J C Haasnoot; Anne M Jonker; Koen Kessels; Nikki Knijn; Ineke van Lijnschoten; Clinton Mijnals; Anya N Milne; Freek C P Moll; Ruud W M Schrauwen; Ramon-Michel Schreuder; Tom J Seerden; Marcel B W M Spanier; Jochim S Terhaar Sive Droste; Emma Witteveen; Wouter H de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel; Frank P Vleggaar; Miangela M Laclé; Frank Ter Borg; Leon M G Moons Journal: Endosc Int Open Date: 2022-04-14
Authors: Fernando A Angarita; Adina E Feinberg; Stanley M Feinberg; Robert H Riddell; J Andrea McCart Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2017-12-28 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: N C A Vermeer; Y Backes; H S Snijders; E Bastiaannet; G J Liefers; L M G Moons; C J H van de Velde; K C M J Peeters Journal: BJS Open Date: 2018-12-24