Sascha C van Doorn1, Y Hazewinkel1, James E East2, Monique E van Leerdam3, Amit Rastogi4, Maria Pellisé5, Silvia Sanduleanu-Dascalescu6, Barbara A J Bastiaansen1, Paul Fockens1, Evelien Dekker1. 1. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 2. Translational Gastroenterology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. 3. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 4. Endoscopy Department, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, USA. 5. Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínic, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain. 6. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The Paris classification is an international classification system for describing polyp morphology. Thus far, the validity and reproducibility of this classification have not been assessed. We aimed to determine the interobserver agreement for the Paris classification among seven Western expert endoscopists. METHODS: A total of 85 short endoscopic video clips depicting polyps were created and assessed by seven expert endoscopists according to the Paris classification. After a digital training module, the same 85 polyps were assessed again. We calculated the interobserver agreement with a Fleiss kappa and as the proportion of pairwise agreement. RESULTS: The interobserver agreement of the Paris classification among seven experts was moderate with a Fleiss kappa of 0.42 and a mean pairwise agreement of 67%. The proportion of lesions assessed as "flat" by the experts ranged between 13 and 40% (P<0.001). After the digital training, the interobserver agreement did not change (kappa 0.38, pairwise agreement 60%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study is the first to validate the Paris classification for polyp morphology. We demonstrated only a moderate interobserver agreement among international Western experts for this classification system. Our data suggest that, in its current version, the use of this classification system in daily practice is questionable and it is unsuitable for comparative endoscopic research. We therefore suggest introduction of a simplification of the classification system.
OBJECTIVES: The Paris classification is an international classification system for describing polyp morphology. Thus far, the validity and reproducibility of this classification have not been assessed. We aimed to determine the interobserver agreement for the Paris classification among seven Western expert endoscopists. METHODS: A total of 85 short endoscopic video clips depicting polyps were created and assessed by seven expert endoscopists according to the Paris classification. After a digital training module, the same 85 polyps were assessed again. We calculated the interobserver agreement with a Fleiss kappa and as the proportion of pairwise agreement. RESULTS: The interobserver agreement of the Paris classification among seven experts was moderate with a Fleiss kappa of 0.42 and a mean pairwise agreement of 67%. The proportion of lesions assessed as "flat" by the experts ranged between 13 and 40% (P<0.001). After the digital training, the interobserver agreement did not change (kappa 0.38, pairwise agreement 60%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study is the first to validate the Paris classification for polyp morphology. We demonstrated only a moderate interobserver agreement among international Western experts for this classification system. Our data suggest that, in its current version, the use of this classification system in daily practice is questionable and it is unsuitable for comparative endoscopic research. We therefore suggest introduction of a simplification of the classification system.
Authors: Simon P L Travis; Dan Schnell; Piotr Krzeski; Maria T Abreu; Douglas G Altman; Jean-Frédéric Colombel; Brian G Feagan; Stephen B Hanauer; Gary R Lichtenstein; Philippe R Marteau; Walter Reinisch; Bruce E Sands; Bruce R Yacyshyn; Patrick Schnell; Christian A Bernhardt; Jean-Yves Mary; William J Sandborn Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2013-07-25 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Brian Bressler; Lawrence F Paszat; Zhongliang Chen; Deanna M Rothwell; Chris Vinden; Linda Rabeneck Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Esther M Stoop; Margriet C de Haan; Thomas R de Wijkerslooth; Patrick M Bossuyt; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; C Yung Nio; Marc J van de Vijver; Katharina Biermann; Maarten Thomeer; Monique E van Leerdam; Paul Fockens; Jaap Stoker; Ernst J Kuipers; Evelien Dekker Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2011-11-15 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Nancy N Baxter; Meredith A Goldwasser; Lawrence F Paszat; Refik Saskin; David R Urbach; Linda Rabeneck Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2008-12-15 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Else-Mariëtte B van Heijningen; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Ernst J Kuipers; Evelien Dekker; Wilco Lesterhuis; Frank Ter Borg; Juda Vecht; Vincent De Jonge; Pieter Spoelstra; Leopold Engels; Clemens J M Bolwerk; Robin Timmer; Jan H Kleibeuker; Jan J Koornstra; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Ewout W Steyerberg Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2013-03-07 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Michal F Kaminski; Siwan Thomas-Gibson; Marek Bugajski; Michael Bretthauer; Colin J Rees; Evelien Dekker; Geir Hoff; Rodrigo Jover; Stepan Suchanek; Monika Ferlitsch; John Anderson; Thomas Roesch; Rolf Hultcranz; Istvan Racz; Ernst J Kuipers; Kjetil Garborg; James E East; Maciej Rupinski; Birgitte Seip; Cathy Bennett; Carlo Senore; Silvia Minozzi; Raf Bisschops; Dirk Domagk; Roland Valori; Cristiano Spada; Cesare Hassan; Mario Dinis-Ribeiro; Matthew D Rutter Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2017-03-16 Impact factor: 4.623
Authors: Raf Bisschops; Miguel Areia; Emmanuel Coron; Daniela Dobru; Bernd Kaskas; Roman Kuvaev; Oliver Pech; Krish Ragunath; Bas Weusten; Pietro Familiari; Dirk Domagk; Roland Valori; Michal F Kaminski; Cristiano Spada; Michael Bretthauer; Cathy Bennett; Carlo Senore; Mário Dinis-Ribeiro; Matthew D Rutter Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2016-08-21 Impact factor: 4.623
Authors: Krista N Adamovich-Rippe; Philipp D Mayhew; Stanley L Marks; Laura E Selmic; William T N Culp; Angela M Youello; Jeffrey J Runge; David E Holt; Philip H Kass; John R Peauroi Journal: J Am Vet Med Assoc Date: 2017-02-15 Impact factor: 1.936
Authors: Mafalda João; Miguel Areia; Susana Alves; Luís Elvas; Filipe Taveira; Daniel Brito; Sandra Saraiva; Ana Teresa Cadime Journal: GE Port J Gastroenterol Date: 2021-04-09
Authors: Chang-ho Ryan Choi; Ana Ignjatovic-Wilson; Alan Askari; Gui Han Lee; Janindra Warusavitarne; Morgan Moorghen; Siwan Thomas-Gibson; Brian P Saunders; Matthew D Rutter; Trevor A Graham; Ailsa L Hart Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-09-29 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Jae Hyun Kim; Kyoung Sik Nam; Hye Jung Kwon; Youn Jung Choi; Kyoungwon Jung; Sung Eun Kim; Won Moon; Moo In Park; Seun Ja Park Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2017-09-14 Impact factor: 5.742