Literature DB >> 18355372

Salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection for residual or local recurrent intraepithelial neoplasia in the colorectum: a prospective analysis.

D P Hurlstone1, A J Shorthouse, S R Brown, N Tiffin, S S Cross.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A prospective technical feasibility study of cap assisted ESD for 'curative intent' in patients with residual or local neoplastic recurrence following EMR. Primary end points were second stage R0 resection rate, safety and recurrence.
METHOD: Salvage ESD was performed using the Olympus GIF-XQ240 gastroscope and KD-630L insulation tipped knife. Thirty-day mortality, re-admission rates, complications and histological resection status were collected prospectively up to 9 months following index resection.
RESULTS: Thirty patients met eligibility criteria. Index R0 resection was achieved in 25/30 (83%) lesions. One patient underwent surgical excision with a second receiving a curative second stage dissection. Ninety-six per cent (29/30) patients were discharged within 24 h of the procedure with a 0% 30-day mortality and re-admission rate. Bleeding occurred in 5/30 (16%) treated successfully with endoluminal haemostasis. There were no perforations. Overall 'cure' rates at short-term follow-up [median 6/12 (range; 3-18)] was 96%.
CONCLUSION: This novel application of ESD for first line 'salvage' therapy in treating residual or locally recurrent neoplastic disease may be a safe, minimally invasive and cost effective alternative to direct surgical resection in a select patient cohort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18355372     DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01510.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  10 in total

1.  Outcomes of endoscopic treatment of second recurrences of large nonpedunculated colorectal adenomas.

Authors:  Hyun Gun Kim; Saurabh Sethi; Subhas Banerjee; Shai Friedland
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for management of colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Shinji Tanaka; Yusuke Saitoh; Takahisa Matsuda; Masahiro Igarashi; Takayuki Matsumoto; Yasushi Iwao; Yasumoto Suzuki; Hiroshi Nishida; Toshiaki Watanabe; Tamotsu Sugai; Ken-Ichi Sugihara; Osamu Tsuruta; Ichiro Hirata; Nobuo Hiwatashi; Hiroshi Saito; Mamoru Watanabe; Kentaro Sugano; Tooru Shimosegawa
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 7.527

3.  More advanced or aggressive colorectal cancer is associated with a higher incidence of "high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia" on biopsy-based pathological examination.

Authors:  X B Wei; X H Gao; H Wang; C G Fu; W Q Zheng; J M Zheng; W Zhang; L J Liu
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  The concurrence of histologically positive resection margins and sessile morphology is an important risk factor for lymph node metastasis after complete endoscopic removal of malignant colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Lars Boenicke; Martin Fein; Marco Sailer; Christoph Isbert; Christoph-Tomas Germer; Andreas Thalheimer
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgical treatment for gastrointestinal cancer.

Authors:  Michio Asano
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-10-16

6.  Association of Poor Differentiation or Positive Vertical Margin with Residual Disease in Patients with Subsequent Colectomy after Complete Macroscopic Endoscopic Resection of Early Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Ki Ju Kim; Hyun Seok Lee; Seong Woo Jeon; Sun Jin; Sang Won Lee
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 2.260

Review 7.  Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: patient selection and special considerations.

Authors:  Andrew Emmanuel; Shraddha Gulati; Margaret Burt; Bu'Hussain Hayee; Amyn Haji
Journal:  Clin Exp Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-07-13

8.  The feasibility of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of residual or recurrent tumor localized in therapeutic scar tissue.

Authors:  Ryosuke Kobayashi; Kingo Hirasawa; Ryosuke Ikeda; Takeh de Fukuchi; Yasuaki Ishii; Hiroaki Kaneko; Makomo Makazu; Chiko Sato; Shin Maeda
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2017-12-06

9.  Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for high-grade dysplasia and early-stage carcinoma in the colorectum.

Authors:  Tao Chen; Wen-Zheng Qin; Li-Qing Yao; Yun-Shi Zhong; Yi-Qun Zhang; Wei-Feng Chen; Jian-Wei Hu; Marie Ooi; Ling-Li Chen; Ying-Yong Hou; Mei-Dong Xu; Ping-Hong Zhou
Journal:  Cancer Commun (Lond)       Date:  2018-03-21

10.  Treatment strategy for local recurrences after endoscopic resection of a colorectal neoplasm.

Authors:  Sayo Ito; Kinichi Hotta; Kenichiro Imai; Yuichiro Yamaguchi; Yoshihiro Kishida; Kohei Takizawa; Naomi Kakushima; Noboru Kawata; Masao Yoshida; Hirotoshi Ishiwatari; Hiroyuki Matsubayashi; Hiroyuki Ono
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 4.584

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.