Literature DB >> 19889992

Reference frame of the ventriloquism aftereffect.

Norbert Kopco1, I-Fan Lin, Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham, Jennifer M Groh.   

Abstract

Seeing the image of a newscaster on a television set causes us to think that the sound coming from the loudspeaker is actually coming from the screen. How images capture sounds is mysterious because the brain uses different methods for determining the locations of visual versus auditory stimuli. The retina senses the locations of visual objects with respect to the eyes, whereas differences in sound characteristics across the ears indicate the locations of sound sources referenced to the head. Here, we tested which reference frame (RF) is used when vision recalibrates perceived sound locations. Visually guided biases in sound localization were induced in seven humans and two monkeys who made eye movements to auditory or audiovisual stimuli. On audiovisual (training) trials, the visual component of the targets was displaced laterally by 5-6 degrees. Interleaved auditory-only (probe) trials served to evaluate the effect of experience with mismatched visual stimuli on auditory localization. We found that the displaced visual stimuli induced ventriloquism aftereffect in both humans (approximately 50% of the displacement size) and monkeys (approximately 25%), but only for locations around the trained spatial region, showing that audiovisual recalibration can be spatially specific. We tested the reference frame in which the recalibration occurs. On probe trials, we varied eye position relative to the head to dissociate head- from eye-centered RFs. Results indicate that both humans and monkeys use a mixture of the two RFs, suggesting that the neural mechanisms involved in ventriloquism occur in brain region(s) using a hybrid RF for encoding spatial information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19889992      PMCID: PMC2804958          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2783-09.2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  34 in total

1.  Eye position influences auditory responses in primate inferior colliculus.

Authors:  J M Groh; A S Trause; A M Underhill; K R Clark; S Inati
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Models of plasticity in spatial auditory processing.

Authors:  B Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.854

3.  Eye position affects activity in primary auditory cortex of primates.

Authors:  Uri Werner-Reiss; Kristin A Kelly; Amanda S Trause; Abigail M Underhill; Jennifer M Groh
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  The ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integration.

Authors:  David Alais; David Burr
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-02-03       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Involvement of monkey inferior colliculus in spatial hearing.

Authors:  Marcel P Zwiers; Huib Versnel; A John Van Opstal
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-04-28       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  The characteristics and neuronal substrate of saccadic eye movement plasticity.

Authors:  J Johanna Hopp; Albert F Fuchs
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 11.685

7.  Intermodality inconsistency of input and directed attention as determinants of the nature of adaptation.

Authors:  L K Canon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1970-04

8.  Visually induced plasticity of auditory spatial perception in macaques.

Authors:  Timothy M Woods; Gregg H Recanzone
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-09-07       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Plasticity in human sound localization induced by compressed spatial vision.

Authors:  Marcel P Zwiers; A John Van Opstal; Gary D Paige
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Effects of degree of visual association and angle of displacement on the "ventriloquism" effect.

Authors:  C E Jack; W R Thurlow
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1973-12
View more
  28 in total

1.  Distribution of eye position information in the monkey inferior colliculus.

Authors:  David A Bulkin; Jennifer M Groh
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Auditory signals evolve from hybrid- to eye-centered coordinates in the primate superior colliculus.

Authors:  Jungah Lee; Jennifer M Groh
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Neural time course of visually enhanced echo suppression.

Authors:  Christopher W Bishop; Sam London; Lee M Miller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Psychophysics and neuronal bases of sound localization in humans.

Authors:  Jyrki Ahveninen; Norbert Kopčo; Iiro P Jääskeläinen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Auditory modulation of spiking activity and local field potentials in area MT does not appear to underlie an audiovisual temporal illusion.

Authors:  Hulusi Kafaligonul; Thomas D Albright; Gene R Stoner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Spatial receptive field shift by preceding cross-modal stimulation in the cat superior colliculus.

Authors:  Jinghong Xu; Tingting Bi; Jing Wu; Fanzhu Meng; Kun Wang; Jiawei Hu; Xiao Han; Jiping Zhang; Xiaoming Zhou; Les Keniston; Liping Yu
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Hemisphere-specific properties of the ventriloquism aftereffect.

Authors:  Norbert Kopčo; Peter Lokša; I-Fan Lin; Jennifer Groh; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Spatial and frequency specificity of the ventriloquism aftereffect revisited.

Authors:  Patrick Bruns; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-12-28

9.  Modality-specific attention attenuates visual-tactile integration and recalibration effects by reducing prior expectations of a common source for vision and touch.

Authors:  Stephanie Badde; Karen T Navarro; Michael S Landy
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2020-02-06

10.  Accumulation and decay of visual capture and the ventriloquism aftereffect caused by brief audio-visual disparities.

Authors:  Adam K Bosen; Justin T Fleming; Paul D Allen; William E O'Neill; Gary D Paige
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.