Literature DB >> 30144059

Spatial receptive field shift by preceding cross-modal stimulation in the cat superior colliculus.

Jinghong Xu1, Tingting Bi1, Jing Wu1, Fanzhu Meng1, Kun Wang1, Jiawei Hu1, Xiao Han1, Jiping Zhang1, Xiaoming Zhou1, Les Keniston2, Liping Yu1.   

Abstract

KEY POINTS: It has been known for some time that sensory information of one type can bias the spatial perception of another modality. However, there is a lack of evidence of this occurring in individual neurons. In the present study, we found that the spatial receptive field of superior colliculus multisensory neurons could be dynamically shifted by a preceding stimulus in a different modality. The extent to which the receptive field shifted was dependent on both temporal and spatial gaps between the preceding and following stimuli, as well as the salience of the preceding stimulus. This result provides a neural mechanism that could underlie the process of cross-modal spatial calibration. ABSTRACT: Psychophysical studies have shown that the different senses can be spatially entrained by each other. This can be observed in certain phenomena, such as ventriloquism, in which a visual stimulus can attract the perceived location of a spatially discordant sound. However, the neural mechanism underlying this cross-modal spatial recalibration has remained unclear, as has whether it takes place dynamically. We explored these issues in multisensory neurons of the cat superior colliculus (SC), a midbrain structure that involves both cross-modal and sensorimotor integration. Sequential cross-modal stimulation showed that the preceding stimulus can shift the receptive field (RF) of the lagging response. This cross-modal spatial calibration took place in both auditory and visual RFs, although auditory RFs shifted slightly more. By contrast, if a preceding stimulus was from the same modality, it failed to induce a similarly substantial RF shift. The extent of the RF shift was dependent on both temporal and spatial gaps between the preceding and following stimuli, as well as the salience of the preceding stimulus. A narrow time gap and high stimulus salience were able to induce larger RF shifts. In addition, when both visual and auditory stimuli were presented simultaneously, a substantial RF shift toward the location-fixed stimulus was also induced. These results, taken together, reveal an online cross-modal process and reflect the details of the organization of SC inter-sensory spatial calibration.
© 2018 The Authors. The Journal of Physiology © 2018 The Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Superior colliculus; cross-modal spatial calibration; multisensory integration; receptive field

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30144059      PMCID: PMC6187038          DOI: 10.1113/JP275427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  77 in total

1.  Rapid adaptation to auditory-visual spatial disparity.

Authors:  Jörg Lewald
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  Dynamic shifts of visual receptive fields in cortical area MT by spatial attention.

Authors:  Thilo Womelsdorf; Katharina Anton-Erxleben; Florian Pieper; Stefan Treue
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-08-13       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Brief cortical deactivation early in life has long-lasting effects on multisensory behavior.

Authors:  Benjamin A Rowland; Wan Jiang; Barry E Stein
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Where are multisensory signals combined for perceptual decision-making?

Authors:  Jennifer K Bizley; Gareth P Jones; Stephen M Town
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  Cross-modal perceptual integration of spatially and temporally disparate auditory and visual stimuli.

Authors:  Jörg Lewald; Rainer Guski
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2003-05

6.  Accumulation and decay of visual capture and the ventriloquism aftereffect caused by brief audio-visual disparities.

Authors:  Adam K Bosen; Justin T Fleming; Paul D Allen; William E O'Neill; Gary D Paige
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Human time perception and its illusions.

Authors:  David M Eagleman
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 6.627

8.  Plasticity in human sound localization induced by compressed spatial vision.

Authors:  Marcel P Zwiers; A John Van Opstal; Gary D Paige
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Multisensory simultaneity judgment and proximity to the body.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Noel; Marta Lukowska; Mark Wallace; Andrea Serino
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Multisensory integration in the developing tectum is constrained by the balance of excitation and inhibition.

Authors:  Daniel L Felch; Arseny S Khakhalin; Carlos D Aizenman
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.