Literature DB >> 12524547

Plasticity in human sound localization induced by compressed spatial vision.

Marcel P Zwiers1, A John Van Opstal, Gary D Paige.   

Abstract

Auditory and visual target locations are encoded differently in the brain, but must be co-calibrated to maintain cross-sensory concordance. Mechanisms that adjust spatial calibration across modalities have been described (for example, prism adaptation in owls), though rudimentarily in humans. We quantified the adaptation of human sound localization in response to spatially compressed vision (0.5x lenses for 2-3 days). This induced a corresponding compression of auditory localization that was most pronounced for azimuth (minimal for elevation) and was restricted to the visual field of the lenses. Sound localization was also affected outside the field of visual-auditory interaction (shifted centrally, not compressed). These results suggest that spatially modified vision induces adaptive changes in adult human sound localization, including novel mechanisms that account for spatial compression. Findings are consistent with a model in which the central processing of sound location is encoded by recruitment rather than by a place code.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12524547     DOI: 10.1038/nn999

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Neurosci        ISSN: 1097-6256            Impact factor:   24.884


  58 in total

1.  Relearning sound localization with a new ear.

Authors:  Marc M Van Wanrooij; A John Van Opstal
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Can measures of sound localization acuity be related to the precision of absolute location estimates?

Authors:  Jordan M Moore; Daniel J Tollin; Tom C T Yin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Relearning auditory spectral cues for locations inside and outside the visual field.

Authors:  Simon Carlile; Toby Blackman
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-12-04

4.  Perception of auditory, visual, and egocentric spatial alignment adapts differently to changes in eye position.

Authors:  Qi N Cui; Babak Razavi; William E O'Neill; Gary D Paige
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Influence of aging on human sound localization.

Authors:  Marina S Dobreva; William E O'Neill; Gary D Paige
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Spatial receptive field shift by preceding cross-modal stimulation in the cat superior colliculus.

Authors:  Jinghong Xu; Tingting Bi; Jing Wu; Fanzhu Meng; Kun Wang; Jiawei Hu; Xiao Han; Jiping Zhang; Xiaoming Zhou; Les Keniston; Liping Yu
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Development of interactions between sensorimotor representations in school-aged children.

Authors:  Florian A Kagerer; Jane E Clark
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 2.161

8.  Reference frame of the ventriloquism aftereffect.

Authors:  Norbert Kopco; I-Fan Lin; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Jennifer M Groh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Influence of age, spatial memory, and ocular fixation on localization of auditory, visual, and bimodal targets by human subjects.

Authors:  Marina S Dobreva; William E O'Neill; Gary D Paige
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Postnatal experiences influence how the brain integrates information from different senses.

Authors:  Barry E Stein; Thomas J Perrault; Terrence R Stanford; Benjamin A Rowland
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.