Literature DB >> 27837258

Accumulation and decay of visual capture and the ventriloquism aftereffect caused by brief audio-visual disparities.

Adam K Bosen1, Justin T Fleming2, Paul D Allen2, William E O'Neill2, Gary D Paige2.   

Abstract

Visual capture and the ventriloquism aftereffect resolve spatial disparities of incongruent auditory visual (AV) objects by shifting auditory spatial perception to align with vision. Here, we demonstrated the distinct temporal characteristics of visual capture and the ventriloquism aftereffect in response to brief AV disparities. In a set of experiments, subjects localized either the auditory component of AV targets (A within AV) or a second sound presented at varying delays (1-20 s) after AV exposure (A2 after AV). AV targets were trains of brief presentations (1 or 20), covering a ±30° azimuthal range, and with ±8° (R or L) disparity. We found that the magnitude of visual capture generally reached its peak within a single AV pair and did not dissipate with time, while the ventriloquism aftereffect accumulated with repetitions of AV pairs and dissipated with time. Additionally, the magnitude of the auditory shift induced by each phenomenon was uncorrelated across listeners and visual capture was unaffected by subsequent auditory targets, indicating that visual capture and the ventriloquism aftereffect are separate mechanisms with distinct effects on auditory spatial perception. Our results indicate that visual capture is a 'sample-and-hold' process that binds related objects and stores the combined percept in memory, whereas the ventriloquism aftereffect is a 'leaky integrator' process that accumulates with experience and decays with time to compensate for cross-modal disparities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory; Cross-modal; Ventriloquism; Ventriloquism aftereffect; Visual; Visual capture

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27837258      PMCID: PMC5274572          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-016-4820-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  42 in total

1.  Rapid adaptation to auditory-visual spatial disparity.

Authors:  Jörg Lewald
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 2.  Causal inference in perception.

Authors:  Ladan Shams; Ulrik R Beierholm
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Perceptual load influences auditory space perception in the ventriloquist aftereffect.

Authors:  Ranmalee Eramudugolla; Marc R Kamke; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-10-25

4.  The aftereffects of ventriloquism: patterns of spatial generalization.

Authors:  Paul Bertelson; Ilja Frissen; Jean Vroomen; Béatrice de Gelder
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2006-04

5.  Bayesian inference with probabilistic population codes.

Authors:  Wei Ji Ma; Jeffrey M Beck; Peter E Latham; Alexandre Pouget
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-10-22       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Bayesian inference explains perception of unity and ventriloquism aftereffect: identification of common sources of audiovisual stimuli.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Sato; Taro Toyoizumi; Kazuyuki Aihara
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.026

7.  Visual recalibration of auditory spatial perception: two separate neural circuits for perceptual learning.

Authors:  Claudia Passamonti; Ilja Frissen; Elisabetta Làdavas
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 3.386

8.  Eye position and cross-sensory learning both contribute to prism adaptation of auditory space.

Authors:  Qi N Cui; Laura Bachus; Eva Knoth; William E O'Neill; Gary D Paige
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.453

9.  Plasticity in human sound localization induced by compressed spatial vision.

Authors:  Marcel P Zwiers; A John Van Opstal; Gary D Paige
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Predicting auditory space calibration from recent multisensory experience.

Authors:  Catarina Mendonça; Andreas Escher; Steven van de Par; Hans Colonius
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  12 in total

1.  Spatial receptive field shift by preceding cross-modal stimulation in the cat superior colliculus.

Authors:  Jinghong Xu; Tingting Bi; Jing Wu; Fanzhu Meng; Kun Wang; Jiawei Hu; Xiao Han; Jiping Zhang; Xiaoming Zhou; Les Keniston; Liping Yu
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Modality-specific attention attenuates visual-tactile integration and recalibration effects by reducing prior expectations of a common source for vision and touch.

Authors:  Stephanie Badde; Karen T Navarro; Michael S Landy
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2020-02-06

3.  Alpha Activity Reflects the Magnitude of an Individual Bias in Human Perception.

Authors:  Laetitia Grabot; Christoph Kayser
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Influence of Visual Prism Adaptation on Auditory Space Representation.

Authors:  Klaudia Pochopien; Manfred Fahle
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-12-18

5.  Multiple time scales of the ventriloquism aftereffect.

Authors:  Adam K Bosen; Justin T Fleming; Paul D Allen; William E O'Neill; Gary D Paige
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The Ventriloquist Illusion as a Tool to Study Multisensory Processing: An Update.

Authors:  Patrick Bruns
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-12

7.  Shared neural underpinnings of multisensory integration and trial-by-trial perceptual recalibration in humans.

Authors:  Hame Park; Christoph Kayser
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  The Neurophysiological Basis of the Trial-Wise and Cumulative Ventriloquism Aftereffects.

Authors:  Hame Park; Christoph Kayser
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Robust spatial ventriloquism effect and trial-by-trial aftereffect under memory interference.

Authors:  Hame Park; Christoph Kayser
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Trial by trial dependencies in multisensory perception and their correlates in dynamic brain activity.

Authors:  Stephanie J Kayser; Christoph Kayser
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.