Literature DB >> 31472570

Hemisphere-specific properties of the ventriloquism aftereffect.

Norbert Kopčo1, Peter Lokša1, I-Fan Lin2, Jennifer Groh3, Barbara Shinn-Cunningham4.   

Abstract

Visual calibration of auditory space requires re-alignment of representations differing in (1) format (auditory hemispheric channels vs visual maps) and (2) reference frames (head-centered vs eye-centered). Here, a ventriloquism paradigm from Kopčo, Lin, Shinn-Cunningham, and Groh [J. Neurosci. 29, 13809-13814 (2009)] was used to examine these processes in humans for ventriloquism induced within one spatial hemifield. Results show that (1) the auditory representation can be adapted even by aligned audio-visual stimuli, and (2) the spatial reference frame is primarily head-centered, with a weak eye-centered modulation. These results support the view that the ventriloquism aftereffect is driven by multiple spatially non-uniform, hemisphere-specific processes.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31472570      PMCID: PMC6707804          DOI: 10.1121/1.5123176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  13 in total

1.  Two models for transforming auditory signals from head-centered to eye-centered coordinates.

Authors:  J M Groh; D L Sparks
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.086

Review 2.  Mechanisms of sound localization in mammals.

Authors:  Benedikt Grothe; Michael Pecka; David McAlpine
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 37.312

3.  The aftereffects of ventriloquism: patterns of spatial generalization.

Authors:  Paul Bertelson; Ilja Frissen; Jean Vroomen; Béatrice de Gelder
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2006-04

4.  Auditory spatial perception dynamically realigns with changing eye position.

Authors:  Babak Razavi; William E O'Neill; Gary D Paige
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Psychophysical evidence for adaptation of central auditory processors for interaural differences in time and level.

Authors:  Dennis P Phillips; Susan E Hall
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Context effects in the discriminability of spatial cues.

Authors:  Julia Kerstin Maier; David McAlpine; Georg M Klump; Daniel Pressnitzer
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-12-22

7.  Adaptation to stimulus statistics in the perception and neural representation of auditory space.

Authors:  Johannes C Dahmen; Peter Keating; Fernando R Nodal; Andreas L Schulz; Andrew J King
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Reference frame of the ventriloquism aftereffect.

Authors:  Norbert Kopco; I-Fan Lin; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Jennifer M Groh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Visually induced plasticity of auditory spatial perception in macaques.

Authors:  Timothy M Woods; Gregg H Recanzone
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-09-07       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  A population rate code of auditory space in the human cortex.

Authors:  Nelli H Salminen; Patrick J C May; Paavo Alku; Hannu Tiitinen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.