Literature DB >> 19876658

Anatomy of large animal spines and its comparison to the human spine: a systematic review.

Sun-Ren Sheng1, Xiang-Yang Wang, Hua-Zi Xu, Guo-Qing Zhu, Yi-Fei Zhou.   

Abstract

Animal models have been commonly used for in vivo and in vitro spinal research. However, the extent to which animal models resemble the human spine has not been well known. We conducted a systematic review to compare the morphometric features of vertebrae between human and animal species, so as to give some suggestions on how to choose an appropriate animal model in spine research. A literature search of all English language peer-reviewed publications was conducted using PubMed, OVID, Springer and Elsevier (Science Direct) for the years 1980-2008. Two reviewers extracted data on the anatomy of large animal spines from the identified articles. Each anatomical study of animals had to include at least three vertebral levels. The anatomical data from all animal studies were compared with the existing data of the human spine in the literature. Of the papers retrieved, seven were included in the review. The animals in the studies involved baboon, sheep, porcine, calf and deer. Distinct anatomical differences of vertebrae were found between the human and each large animal spine. In cervical region, spines of the baboon and human are more similar as compared to other animals. In thoracic and lumbar regions, the mean pedicle height of all animals was greater than the human pedicles. There was similar mean pedicle width between animal and the human specimens, except in thoracic segments of sheep. The human spinal canal was wider and deeper in the anteroposterior plane than any of the animals. The mean human vertebral body width and depth were greater than that of the animals except in upper thoracic segments of the deer. However, the mean vertebral body height was lower than that of all animals. This paper provides a comprehensive review to compare vertebrae geometries of experimental animal models to the human vertebrae, and will help for choosing animal model in vivo and in vitro spine research. When the animal selected for spine research, the structural similarities and differences found in the animal studies must be kept in mind.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19876658      PMCID: PMC2899734          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-1192-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  24 in total

Review 1.  The use of a quadruped as an in vivo model for the study of the spine - biomechanical considerations.

Authors:  Theo H Smit
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Anatomy of deer spine and its comparison to the human spine.

Authors:  N Kumar; S Kukreti; M Ishaque; R Mulholland
Journal:  Anat Rec       Date:  2000-10-01

3.  The porcine cervical spine as a model of the human lumbar spine: an anatomical, geometric, and functional comparison.

Authors:  V R Yingling; J P Callaghan; S M McGill
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1999-10

4.  The efficacy of interconnected porous hydroxyapatite in achieving posterolateral lumbar fusion in sheep.

Authors:  H G Baramki; T Steffen; P Lander; M Chang; D Marchesi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  The effect of cage stiffness on the rate of lumbar interbody fusion: an in vivo model using poly(l-lactic Acid) and titanium cages.

Authors:  Martijn van Dijk; Theo H Smit; S Sugihara; Elisabeth H Burger; Paul I Wuisman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Comparison between sheep and human cervical spines: an anatomic, radiographic, bone mineral density, and biomechanical study.

Authors:  F Kandziora; R Pflugmacher; M Scholz; K Schnake; M Lucke; R Schröder; T Mittlmeier
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Comparative morphometry of L4 vertebrae: comparison of large animal models for the human lumbar spine.

Authors:  Robert F McLain; Scott A Yerby; Timothy A Moseley
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Morphology and kinematics of the baboon upper cervical spine. A model of the atlantoaxial complex.

Authors:  C A Dickman; N R Crawford; T Tominaga; A G Brantley; S Coons; V K Sonntag
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  A dynamic investigation of the burst fracture process using a combined experimental and finite element approach.

Authors:  R K Wilcox; D J Allen; R M Hall; D Limb; D C Barton; R A Dickson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-01-09       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  A biomechanical comparison of calf versus cadaver lumbar spine models.

Authors:  Lee H Riley; Jason C Eck; Hiroyuki Yoshida; Young Do Koh; Jae Won You; Tae-Hong Lim
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  45 in total

1.  Fine grained osseointegrative coating improves biocompatibility of PEEK in heterotopic sheep model.

Authors:  Caroline M F Meers; Gino B M Verleye; Dirk Smeets; Hadewych Y R Van Hauwermeiren; Dirk Loeckx; Karel Willems; Vincent G M G G B Siau; Philippe J M E Lauweryns
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-17

2.  [Radiological comparison between two procedures for ventral spondylodesis: autologous iliac crest bone graft vs bovine bone graft].

Authors:  D Kubosch; J Rohr; K Izadpanah; T O Hammer; N P Südkamp; P C Strohm
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  The impact of a corrective tether on a scoliosis porcine model: a detailed 3D analysis with a 20 weeks follow-up.

Authors:  Bertrand Moal; Frank Schwab; Jason Demakakos; Renaud Lafage; Paul Riviere; Ashish Patel; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-03-17       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  An analysis of spine fusion outcomes in sheep pre-clinical models.

Authors:  Emily M Lindley; Cameron Barton; Thomas Blount; Evalina L Burger; Christopher M J Cain; Howard B Seim; A Simon Turner; Vikas V Patel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Collateral effects of targeting the nucleus pulposus via a transpedicular or transannular surgical route: a combined X-ray, MRI, and histological long-term descriptive study in sheep.

Authors:  Cyrille Decante; Johann Clouet; Antoine Hamel; Luc Le Fournier; Olivier Gauthier; Dominique Rouleau; Julie Lesoeur; Boris Halgand; Catherine Le Visage; Jérôme Guicheux; Marion Fusellier
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Thoracic spine morphology of a pseudo-biped animal model (kangaroo) and comparisons with human and quadruped animals.

Authors:  Sriram Balasubramanian; James R Peters; Lucy F Robinson; Anita Singh; Richard W Kent
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Multi-Site Optical Monitoring of Spinal Cord Ischemia during Spine Distraction.

Authors:  David R Busch; Wei Lin; Chunyu Cai; Alissa Cutrone; Jakub Tatka; Brandon J Kovarovic; Arjun G Yodh; Thomas F Floyd; James Barsi
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 5.269

8.  Fiber-optic Monitoring of Spinal Cord Hemodynamics in Experimental Aortic Occlusion.

Authors:  Angela S Kogler; Thomas V Bilfinger; Robert M Galler; Rickson C Mesquita; Michael Cutrone; Steven S Schenkel; Arjun G Yodh; Thomas F Floyd
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  Effects of cement augmentation on the mechanical stability of multilevel spine after vertebral compression fracture.

Authors:  Eelin Tan; Tian Wang; Matthew H Pelletier; William R Walsh
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-06

10.  Apoptosis of endplate chondrocytes in post-laminectomy cervical kyphotic deformity. An in vivo animal model in sheep.

Authors:  Dechao Kong; Tiansheng Zheng; Jiahu Fang; Xiang Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-05-05       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.