Literature DB >> 26273553

Fine grained osseointegrative coating improves biocompatibility of PEEK in heterotopic sheep model.

Caroline M F Meers1, Gino B M Verleye2, Dirk Smeets3, Hadewych Y R Van Hauwermeiren1, Dirk Loeckx3, Karel Willems4, Vincent G M G G B Siau5, Philippe J M E Lauweryns6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) materials already have been used successfully in orthopedic and especially spine surgery. PEEK is radiolucent and comparable with bone regarding elasticity. However, PEEK is inert and the adhesion of PEEK implants to bone tissue proceeds slowly because of their relatively low biocompatibility. The aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of titanium and CaP coating on the adhesion of bone tissue.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Six adult sheep (body weight 57.6 ± 3.9 kg) were included in this study. Three different types of cylindrical dowels (12 mm length x 8 mm diameter) were implanted in long bones (tibia and femur): PEEK dowels without coating (the control group), and PEEK dowels with a nanocoating of calcium phosphate (CaP group) or titanium (titanium group). Animals were sacrificed after 6, 12 and 26 weeks. Dowels were explanted for micro CT and histology.
RESULTS: Bone implant contact (BIC) ratio was significantly higher in the titanium versus control groups in the 6 to 12 weeks period (p = 0.03). The ratio between bone volume and tissue volume (BV/TV) was significantly higher in titanium versus control in the 6 to 12 weeks period (p = 0.02). A significant correlation between BIC and BV/TV was seen (r = 0.85, p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Coating of PEEK dowels with a nanocoating of titanium has beneficial effects on adhesion of bone tissue.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone ingrowth; In vivo test; Nanotopography; Polyetheretherketone; spinal surgery; titanium

Year:  2015        PMID: 26273553      PMCID: PMC4528570          DOI: 10.14444/2035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2211-4599


  11 in total

Review 1.  Anatomy of large animal spines and its comparison to the human spine: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sun-Ren Sheng; Xiang-Yang Wang; Hua-Zi Xu; Guo-Qing Zhu; Yi-Fei Zhou
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Bony and vascular anatomy of the normal cervical spine in the sheep.

Authors:  C C Cain; R D Fraser
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Adhesion and growth of CaCo2 cells on surface-modified PEEK substrata.

Authors:  O Noiset; Y J Schneider; J Marchand-Brynaert
Journal:  J Biomater Sci Polym Ed       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.517

Review 4.  Animal models for implant biomaterial research in bone: a review.

Authors:  A I Pearce; R G Richards; S Milz; E Schneider; S G Pearce
Journal:  Eur Cell Mater       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 3.942

5.  Comparison between sheep and human cervical spines: an anatomic, radiographic, bone mineral density, and biomechanical study.

Authors:  F Kandziora; R Pflugmacher; M Scholz; K Schnake; M Lucke; R Schröder; T Mittlmeier
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  The effect of sol-gel-formed calcium phosphate coatings on bone ingrowth and osteoconductivity of porous-surfaced Ti alloy implants.

Authors:  H Q Nguyen; D A Deporter; R M Pilliar; N Valiquette; R Yakubovich
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 7.  PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants.

Authors:  Steven M Kurtz; John N Devine
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Attachment and proliferation of osteoblasts and fibroblasts on biomaterials for orthopaedic use.

Authors:  A Hunter; C W Archer; P S Walker; G W Blunn
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Morphometric analysis of human bone biopsies: a quantitative structural comparison of histological sections and micro-computed tomography.

Authors:  R Müller; H Van Campenhout; B Van Damme; G Van Der Perre; J Dequeker; T Hildebrand; P Rüegsegger
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 10.  The potential of sheep for the study of osteopenia: current status and comparison with other animal models.

Authors:  E Newman; A S Turner; J D Wark
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  3 in total

1.  Porous titanium-coated polyetheretherketone implants exhibit an improved bone-implant interface: an in vitro and in vivo biochemical, biomechanical, and histological study.

Authors:  Boyle C Cheng; Sravanthi Koduri; Charles A Wing; Natalie Woolery; Daniel J Cook; Robert C Spiro
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2018-10-29

2.  Superior Osteo-Inductive and Osteo-Conductive Properties of Trabecular Titanium vs. PEEK Scaffolds on Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells: A Proof of Concept for the Use of Fusion Cages.

Authors:  Enrico Ragni; Carlotta Perucca Orfei; Alessandro Bidossi; Elena De Vecchi; Natale Francaviglia; Alberto Romano; Gianluca Maestretti; Fulvio Tartara; Laura de Girolamo
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Randomized Controlled Trial of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Ti- and CaP-Nanocoated Polyetheretherketone Cages: Comparative Study of the 1-Year Radiological and Clinical Outcome.

Authors:  Karel Willems; Philippe Lauweryns; Gino Verleye; Johan VAN Goethem
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-12-31
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.