Literature DB >> 10788847

The efficacy of interconnected porous hydroxyapatite in achieving posterolateral lumbar fusion in sheep.

H G Baramki1, T Steffen, P Lander, M Chang, D Marchesi.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: An animal study was performed to evaluate lumbar spinal fusion radiologically and mechanically.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of interconnected porous hydroxyapatite in achieving posterolateral lumbar arthrodesis in sheep. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Posterolateral spinal arthrodesis with autologous bone graft is the gold standard procedure for lumbar fusion. The procedure for harvesting bone from the iliac crest increases morbidity. Interconnected porous hydroxyapatite has been used effectively as an alternative to cancellous bone graft material in metaphyseal bone defects. Little is known about the efficacy of interconnected porous hydroxyapatite in achieving lumbar spinal fusion.
METHODS: Four groups of seven sheep underwent bisegmental posterolateral lumbar fusion with instrumentation using different intertransverse graft material. In group 1, no graft material was used. In group 2, autologous bone was used. Group 3 had interconnected porous hydroxyapatite. Group 4 had an equip of interconnected porous hydroxyapatite and autologous bone. The animals were killed at 20 weeks after surgery. Radiographs and computed tomography images were obtained. The fusion masses were graded for bone resorption and trabecular connectivity on the computed tomography images. Mechanical testing of the specimens was performed, and the three-dimensional segmental motion was measured in flexion/extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending.
RESULTS: The radiographic images were difficult to interpret because of the radiodense interconnected porous hydroxyapatite granules. According to mechanical stability criteria, the fusion rate for the different groups was as follows: 100% (14/14) for the autologous bone group, 72% (10/14) for the bone/interconnected porous hydroxyapatite group, 50% (7/14) for the pure interconnected porous hydroxyapatite group, and 15% (2/14) for the sham group.
CONCLUSIONS: Spinal arthrodesis using interconnected porous hydroxyapatite alone or mixed with bone as graft material reduced segmental motion. It was not, however, as effective as autologous bone graft material in achieving spinal arthrodesis. The sheep model using autologous bone achieved a 100% fusion rate. Because the nonunion rate for a single level in humans may be as high as 40%, the fusion rate with bone/interconnected porous hydroxyapatite in humans may be lower than the 72% found in the sheep model. The little resorption of the radiodense interconnected porous hydroxyapatite granules made the radiologic evaluation of the fusion masses difficult.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10788847     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200005010-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  11 in total

1.  Spinal fusion using an autologous growth factor gel and a porous resorbable ceramic.

Authors:  William R Walsh; Andreas Loefler; Sean Nicklin; Doug Arm; Ralph E Stanford; Yan Yu; Richard Harris; R M Gillies
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-03-18       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  An update on bone substitutes for spinal fusion.

Authors:  Masashi Miyazaki; Hiroshi Tsumura; Jeffrey C Wang; Ahmet Alanay
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Anatomy of large animal spines and its comparison to the human spine: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sun-Ren Sheng; Xiang-Yang Wang; Hua-Zi Xu; Guo-Qing Zhu; Yi-Fei Zhou
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Bone graft substitutes for spine fusion: A brief review.

Authors:  Ashim Gupta; Nitin Kukkar; Kevin Sharif; Benjamin J Main; Christine E Albers; Saadiq F El-Amin Iii
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-07-18

Review 5.  An analysis of spine fusion outcomes in sheep pre-clinical models.

Authors:  Emily M Lindley; Cameron Barton; Thomas Blount; Evalina L Burger; Christopher M J Cain; Howard B Seim; A Simon Turner; Vikas V Patel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Efficacy of silicate-substituted calcium phosphate with enhanced strut porosity as a standalone bone graft substitute and autograft extender in an ovine distal femoral critical defect model.

Authors:  Stacy A Hutchens; Charlie Campion; Michel Assad; Madeleine Chagnon; Karin A Hing
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  Correlative radiological, self-assessment and clinical analysis of evolution in instrumented dorsal and lateral fusion for degenerative lumbar spine disease. Autograft versus coralline hydroxyapatite.

Authors:  Panagiotis Korovessis; Georgios Koureas; Spyridon Zacharatos; Zisis Papazisis; Elias Lambiris
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-03-24       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Bone Regeneration of Hydroxyapatite with Granular Form or Porous Scaffold in Canine Alveolar Sockets.

Authors:  Seok Jin Jang; Se Eun Kim; Tae Sung Han; Jun Sik Son; Seong Soo Kang; Seok Hwa Choi
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

9.  Experimental posterolateral spinal fusion with beta tricalcium phosphate ceramic and bone marrow aspirate composite graft.

Authors:  Ankit Gupta; Vijendra Chauhan; Neena Chauhan; Sansar Sharma; Rajesh Maheshwari; Atul Agarwal
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Identification of mesenchymal stem cells and osteogenic factors in bone marrow aspirate and peripheral blood for spinal fusion by flow cytometry and proteomic analysis.

Authors:  Chi-Chien Niu; Song-Shu Lin; Li-Jen Yuan; Lih-Huei Chen; Tai-Long Pan; Chuen-Yung Yang; Po-Liang Lai; Wen-Jer Chen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2014-05-03       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.