Literature DB >> 11923659

The effect of cage stiffness on the rate of lumbar interbody fusion: an in vivo model using poly(l-lactic Acid) and titanium cages.

Martijn van Dijk1, Theo H Smit, S Sugihara, Elisabeth H Burger, Paul I Wuisman.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A goat interbody fusion model using poly-(L-lactic acid) and titanium cages was designed to evaluate the effect of cage stiffness on lumbar interbody fusion.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of cage stiffness on the rate of interbody fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Various types of cages considerably exceed the stiffness of vertebral bone, which ultimately may lead to postoperative complications. To avoid these complications, poly-(L-lactic acid) cages with limited stiffness have been designed. The mechanical integrity of the cages remains intact for at least 6 months.
METHODS: Interbody fusions were performed at L3-L4 of 15 Dutch milk goats, and one of three cages was randomly implanted: 1) a titanium cage (n = 3), 2) a stiff poly-(L-lactic acid) cage (n = 6), or 3) a flexible poly-(L-lactic acid) cage (n = 6). Interbody fusion was assessed radiographically by three independent observers 3 and 6 months after surgery.
RESULTS: At 3 months, all the poly-(L-lactic acid) specimens showed ingrowth of new bone, but with radiolucency in the fusion mass. At 6 months, solid arthrodesis was observed in four of six poly-(L-lactic acid) specimens, advanced ingrowth in one specimen, and infection in one specimen. Titanium cages showed ingrowth of bone, but with radiolucency in the fusion mass. Interbody fusion using poly-(L-lactic acid) cages showed a significantly higher rate statistically (P = 0.016) and more complete fusion than titanium cages of the same design.
CONCLUSIONS: The reduced stiffness of poly-(L-lactic acid) cages showed enhanced interbody fusion, as compared with titanium cages after 6 months. Bioabsorbable poly-(L-lactic acid) cages thus may be a viable alternative to current interbody cage devices, thereby avoiding the concomitant problems related to their excessive stiffness. However, the bioabsorbability of the poly-(L-lactic acid) cages awaits investigation in a long-term study currently underway.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11923659     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200204010-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  28 in total

Review 1.  Biomaterials in orthopaedics.

Authors:  M Navarro; A Michiardi; O Castaño; J A Planell
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-10-06       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion in spondylolisthesis: a prospective controlled study in the Han nationality.

Authors:  Lei Cheng; Lin Nie; Li Zhang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Porous biodegradable lumbar interbody fusion cage design and fabrication using integrated global-local topology optimization with laser sintering.

Authors:  Heesuk Kang; Scott J Hollister; Frank La Marca; Paul Park; Chia-Ying Lin
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 4.  Anatomy of large animal spines and its comparison to the human spine: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sun-Ren Sheng; Xiang-Yang Wang; Hua-Zi Xu; Guo-Qing Zhu; Yi-Fei Zhou
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Bioresorbable polymers: heading for a new generation of spinal cages.

Authors:  P I J M Wuisman; T H Smit
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Evaluation of the 96/4 PLDLLA polymer resorbable lumbar interbody cage in a long term animal model.

Authors:  Jean Y Lazennec; Abdallah Madi; Marc A Rousseau; Bernard Roger; Gérard Saillant
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Evolution of Design of Interbody Cages for Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.071

8.  The in vitro stabilising effect of polyetheretherketone cages versus a titanium cage of similar design for anterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  M Spruit; R G Falk; L Beckmann; T Steffen; R M Castelein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-08-17       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Relation between radiological assessment and biomechanical stability of lumbar interbody fusion in a large animal model.

Authors:  R J Kroeze; A J van der Veen; B J van Royen; R A Bank; M N Helder; T H Smit
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Time-dependent failure in load-bearing polymers: a potential hazard in structural applications of polylactides.

Authors:  T H Smit; T A P Engels; S H M Söntjens; L E Govaert
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-11-07       Impact factor: 3.896

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.