Literature DB >> 10993955

Anatomy of deer spine and its comparison to the human spine.

N Kumar1, S Kukreti, M Ishaque, R Mulholland.   

Abstract

The anatomical parameters of the thoracic and lumbar regions of the deer spine were evaluated and compared with the existing data of the human spine. The objective was to create a database for the anatomical parameters of the deer spine, with a view to establish deer spine as a valid model for human spine biomechanical experiments in vitro. To date, the literature has supported the use of both calf and sheep spines as a suitable model for human spine experiments as the difficulty in procuring the human cadaveric spines is well appreciated. With the advent of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) and its likely transmission to human in form of new variant Creutzfeld Jakob disease (CJD), there is a slight risk of transmission to humans through food chain if proper precautions for disposal of specimen are not adhered to. There is also a significant risk of transmission through direct inoculation to the researchers (Wells et al. Vet. Rec., 1998:142:103-106), working with infected bovine and sheep spine. The deer spines are readily available and there are no reported cases of deer being carriers of prion diseases (Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, 1998). Six complete deer spines were measured to determine 22 dimensions from the vertebral bodies, endplates, disc, pedicles, spinal canal, transverse and spinous processes, articular facets. This was compared with the existing data of the human spine in the literature. The deer and human vertebrae show many similarities in the lower thoracic and upper lumbar spine, although they show substantial differences in certain dimensions. The cervical spine was markedly different in comparison. The deer spine may represent a suitable model for human experiments related to gross anatomy of the thoracic and lumbar spine. A thorough database has been provided for deciding the validity of deer spine as a model for the human spine biomechanical in vitro experiments. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10993955     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0185(20001001)260:2<189::AID-AR80>3.0.CO;2-N

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Rec        ISSN: 0003-276X


  14 in total

Review 1.  Anatomy of large animal spines and its comparison to the human spine: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sun-Ren Sheng; Xiang-Yang Wang; Hua-Zi Xu; Guo-Qing Zhu; Yi-Fei Zhou
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Thoracic spine morphology of a pseudo-biped animal model (kangaroo) and comparisons with human and quadruped animals.

Authors:  Sriram Balasubramanian; James R Peters; Lucy F Robinson; Anita Singh; Richard W Kent
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Is sheep lumbar spine a suitable alternative model for human spinal researches? Morphometrical comparison study.

Authors:  Mahmoud Mageed; Dagmar Berner; Henriette Jülke; Christian Hohaus; Walter Brehm; Kerstin Gerlach
Journal:  Lab Anim Res       Date:  2013-12-20

4.  Morphometric comparison of the lumbar cancellous bone of sheep, deer, and humans.

Authors:  Yang Wang; Guomin Liu; Ting Li; Yanlong Xiao; Qing Han; Randong Xu; Youqiong Li
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 0.982

5.  Morphometrical dimensions of the sheep thoracolumbar vertebrae as seen on digitised CT images.

Authors:  Mahmoud Mageed; Dagmar Berner; Henriette Jülke; Christian Hohaus; Walter Brehm; Kerstin Gerlach
Journal:  Lab Anim Res       Date:  2013-09-27

6.  Apoptosis of endplate chondrocytes in post-laminectomy cervical kyphotic deformity. An in vivo animal model in sheep.

Authors:  Dechao Kong; Tiansheng Zheng; Jiahu Fang; Xiang Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-05-05       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Comparative Morphometry of the Wisconsin Miniature SwineTM Thoracic Spine for Modeling Human Spine in Translational Spinal Cord Injury Research.

Authors:  Gurwattan Singh Miranpuri; Dominic T Schomberg; Patricia Stan; Abhishek Chopra; Seah Buttar; Aleksandar Wood; Alexandra Radzin; Jennifer J Meudt; Daniel K Resnick; Dhanansayan Shanmuganayagam
Journal:  Ann Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-24

8.  Comparative anatomical dimensions of the complete human and porcine spine.

Authors:  Iris Busscher; Joris J W Ploegmakers; Gijsbertus J Verkerke; Albert G Veldhuizen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Comparison of Cervical Spine Anatomy in Calves, Pigs and Humans.

Authors:  Sun-Ren Sheng; Hua-Zi Xu; Yong-Li Wang; Qing-An Zhu; Fang-Min Mao; Yan Lin; Xiang-Yang Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Biomechanical Stability of a Cross-Rod Connection with a Pedicle Screw System.

Authors:  Tetsutaro Mizuno; Toshihiko Sakakibara; Takamasa Yoshikawa; Tadashi Inaba; Takaya Kato; Yuichi Kasai
Journal:  Med Sci Monit Basic Res       Date:  2018-01-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.