Literature DB >> 23686774

tcdA As a diagnostic target in a loop-mediated amplification assay for detecting toxigenic Clostridium difficile.

Brianne Couturier1, Robert Schlaberg, Chris Konzak, Jeff Nicholes, Christian Law, Rosemary C She.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The illumigene® (Meridian Bioscience, Inc., Cincinnati, OH) and GeneOhm® (BD Diagnostics, La Jolla, CA) Clostridium difficile assays target the tcdA gene and tcdB gene, respectively. We assessed the use of tcdA as the molecular target in the illumigene® C. difficile loop-mediated amplification assay in detecting a wide variety of C. difficile strains including those with tcdA deletions.
METHODS: We tested 38 C. difficile strains and 108 patient stool specimens using the illumigene® assay. The GeneOhm® real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay served as the reference method. Discordant results were resolved by repeat testing, anaerobic culture, and a laboratory-developed real-time PCR targeting tcdA and tcdB.
RESULTS: Both illumigene® and GeneOhm® assays detected all 37 C. difficile toxin B(+) strains representing seven toxinotypes and including four toxin A(-) B(+) isolates. No cross-reactivity with 20 other Clostridium species or toxin-negative C. difficile was observed in either assay. Among patient stool specimens, agreement was 94.4% (102/108). After discordant result resolution, agreement was 96.3% (104/108). Specimens with initially discordant results had target concentrations approaching the limit of detection for the two commercial assays. Discordance appeared unrelated to whether tcdA or tcdB was the amplification target.
CONCLUSION: The tcdA 5' region used by the illumigene® assay is a practical target for toxigenic C. difficile detection.
© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23686774      PMCID: PMC6807392          DOI: 10.1002/jcla.21577

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal        ISSN: 0887-8013            Impact factor:   2.352


  25 in total

1.  Deletions in the repeating sequences of the toxin A gene of toxin A-negative, toxin B-positive Clostridium difficile strains.

Authors:  H Kato; N Kato; S Katow; T Maegawa; S Nakamura; D M Lyerly
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  1999-06-15       Impact factor: 2.742

2.  Rapid and sensitive loop-mediated isothermal amplification test for Clostridium difficile detection challenges cytotoxin B cell test and culture as gold standard.

Authors:  Torbjörn Norén; Ingegärd Alriksson; Josefin Andersson; Thomas Akerlund; Magnus Unemo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Prospective evaluation of the Meridian Illumigene™ loop-mediated amplification assay and the Gen Probe ProGastro™ Cd polymerase chain reaction assay for the direct detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile from fecal samples.

Authors:  Kirk M Doing; Marilyn S Hintz
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.803

4.  New types of toxin A-negative, toxin B-positive strains among clinical isolates of Clostridium difficile in Australia.

Authors:  Briony Elliott; Michelle M Squire; Sara Thean; Barbara J Chang; Jon S Brazier; Maja Rupnik; Thomas V Riley
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 2.472

5.  Colonisation and transmission of Clostridium difficile in healthy individuals examined by PCR ribotyping and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

Authors:  H Kato; H Kita; T Karasawa; T Maegawa; Y Koino; H Takakuwa; T Saikai; K Kobayashi; T Yamagishi; S Nakamura
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.472

6.  Impact of clinical symptoms on interpretation of diagnostic assays for Clostridium difficile infections.

Authors:  Erik R Dubberke; Zhuolin Han; Linda Bobo; Tiffany Hink; Brenda Lawrence; Susan Copper; Joan Hoppe-Bauer; Carey-Ann D Burnham; William Michael Dunne
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Toxin profiles and resistances to macrolides and newer fluoroquinolones as epidemicity determinants of clinical isolates of Clostridium difficile from Warsaw, Poland.

Authors:  Hanna Pituch; Willem van Leeuwen; Kees Maquelin; Dorota Wultańska; Piotr Obuch-Woszczatyński; Grazyna Nurzyńska; Haru Kato; Martin Reijans; Felicja Meisel-Mikołajczyk; Mirosław Łuczak; Alex van Belkum
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Evaluation of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infections.

Authors:  Valérie Lalande; Laurence Barrault; Sophie Wadel; Catherine Eckert; Jean-Claude Petit; Frédéric Barbut
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Comparison of a commercial real-time PCR assay for tcdB detection to a cell culture cytotoxicity assay and toxigenic culture for direct detection of toxin-producing Clostridium difficile in clinical samples.

Authors:  Paul D Stamper; Romina Alcabasa; Deborah Aird; Wisal Babiker; Jennifer Wehrlin; Ijeoma Ikpeama; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Evaluation of a new commercial TaqMan PCR assay for direct detection of the clostridium difficile toxin B gene in clinical stool specimens.

Authors:  Paul D Stamper; Wisal Babiker; Romina Alcabasa; Deborah Aird; Jennifer Wehrlin; Ijeoma Ikpeama; Linda Gluck; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  3 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Cepheid Xpert C. difficile/Epi and meridian bioscience illumigene C. difficile assays for detecting Clostridium difficile ribotype 033 strains.

Authors:  Grace O Androga; Alan M McGovern; Briony Elliott; Barbara J Chang; Timothy T Perkins; Niki F Foster; Thomas V Riley
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  A prospective study of two isothermal amplification assays compared with real-time PCR, CCNA and toxigenic culture for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Martina Neuendorf; Raquel Guadarrama-Gonzalez; Birgit Lamik; Colin R MacKenzie
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 3.605

Review 3.  Current and Future Perspectives on Isothermal Nucleic Acid Amplification Technologies for Diagnosing Infections.

Authors:  Godwin Attah Obande; Kirnpal Kaur Banga Singh
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 4.003

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.