Literature DB >> 16322603

An epidemic, toxin gene-variant strain of Clostridium difficile.

L Clifford McDonald1, George E Killgore, Angela Thompson, Robert C Owens, Sophia V Kazakova, Susan P Sambol, Stuart Johnson, Dale N Gerding.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent reports suggest that the rate and severity of Clostridium difficile-associated disease in the United States are increasing and that the increase may be associated with the emergence of a new strain of C. difficile with increased virulence, resistance, or both.
METHODS: A total of 187 C. difficile isolates were collected from eight health care facilities in six states (Georgia, Illinois, Maine, New Jersey, Oregon, and Pennsylvania) in which outbreaks of C. difficile-associated disease had occurred between 2000 and 2003. The isolates were characterized by restriction-endonuclease analysis (REA), pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and toxinotyping, and the results were compared with those from a database of more than 6000 isolates obtained before 2001. The polymerase chain reaction was used to detect the recently described binary toxin CDT and a deletion in the pathogenicity locus gene, tcdC, that might result in increased production of toxins A and B.
RESULTS: Isolates that belonged to one REA group (BI) and had the same PFGE type (NAP1) were identified in specimens collected from patients at all eight facilities and accounted for at least half of the isolates from five facilities. REA group BI, which was first identified in 1984, was uncommon among isolates from the historic database (14 cases). Both historic and current (obtained since 2001) BI/NAP1 isolates were of toxinotype III, were positive for the binary toxin CDT, and contained an 18-bp tcdC deletion. Resistance to gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin was more common in current BI/NAP1 isolates than in non-BI/NAP1 isolates (100 percent vs. 42 percent, P<0.001), whereas the rate of resistance to clindamycin was the same in the two groups (79 percent). All of the current but none of the historic BI/NAP1 isolates were resistant to gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin (P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: A previously uncommon strain of C. difficile with variations in toxin genes has become more resistant to fluoroquinolones and has emerged as a cause of geographically dispersed outbreaks of C. difficile-associated disease. Copyright 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16322603     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa051590

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  622 in total

1.  Community-associated Clostridium difficile infection: experience of a veteran affairs medical center in southeastern USA.

Authors:  S Naggie; J Frederick; B C Pien; B A Miller; D T Provenzale; K C Goldberg; C W Woods
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2010-05-08       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 2.  Review of medical and surgical management of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  B Faris; A Blackmore; N Haboubi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2010-05-08       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 3.  Intravenous immunoglobulin for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection: a review.

Authors:  Marwan S Abougergi; John H Kwon
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  A hospital-based study of the clinical characteristics of Clostridium difficile infection in children.

Authors:  Jonathan D Crews; Hoonmo L Koo; Zhi-Dong Jiang; Jeffrey R Starke; Herbert L DuPont
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.129

5.  Clostridium difficile prevalence rates in a large healthcare system stratified according to patient population, age, gender, and specimen consistency.

Authors:  J H Boone; M Goodykoontz; S J Rhodes; K Price; J Smith; K N Gearhart; R J Carman; T M Kerkering; T D Wilkins; D M Lyerly
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Development and evaluation of an ovine antibody-based platform for treatment of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  April Roberts; Joanna McGlashan; Ibrahim Al-Abdulla; Roger Ling; Harriet Denton; Steve Green; Ruth Coxon; John Landon; Clifford Shone
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 7.  Fidaxomicin in Clostridium difficile infection: latest evidence and clinical guidance.

Authors:  Kathleen Mullane
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.091

Review 8.  Clostridium difficile and inflammatory bowel disease: role in pathogenesis and implications in treatment.

Authors:  Orna Nitzan; Mazen Elias; Bibiana Chazan; Raul Raz; Walid Saliba
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Comparison of a commercial real-time PCR assay for tcdB detection to a cell culture cytotoxicity assay and toxigenic culture for direct detection of toxin-producing Clostridium difficile in clinical samples.

Authors:  Paul D Stamper; Romina Alcabasa; Deborah Aird; Wisal Babiker; Jennifer Wehrlin; Ijeoma Ikpeama; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Effective and reduced-cost modified selective medium for isolation of Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Michelle M Nerandzic; Curtis J Donskey
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.