Literature DB >> 20686078

Is repeat PCR needed for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection?

Robert F Luo1, Niaz Banaei.   

Abstract

Patients with diarrhea, defined as loose or watery stool, and two or more Clostridium difficile tcdB PCR tests within 14 days of each other were investigated. Repeat PCR for 293 patients with a prior negative result yielded negative results in 396 (97.5%) of 406 tests. Ten new positives were detected, including one false positive. Repeat PCR within 7 days appears rarely useful, except for patients with evidence of a new infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20686078      PMCID: PMC2953130          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00722-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  19 in total

1.  Rapid detection of toxigenic strains of Clostridium difficile in diarrheal stools by real-time PCR.

Authors:  Frédéric Barbut; Mylena Braun; Béatrice Burghoffer; Valérie Lalande; Catherine Eckert
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Diagnostic value of repeated enzyme immunoassays in Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Hashim Nemat; Rabia Khan; Muhammad Salman Ashraf; Mandeep Matta; Shahin Ahmed; Barbara T Edwards; Roshan Hussain; Martin Lesser; Renee Pekmezaris; Yosef Dlugacz; Gisele Wolf-Klein
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Comparison of a commercial real-time PCR assay for tcdB detection to a cell culture cytotoxicity assay and toxigenic culture for direct detection of toxin-producing Clostridium difficile in clinical samples.

Authors:  Paul D Stamper; Romina Alcabasa; Deborah Aird; Wisal Babiker; Jennifer Wehrlin; Ijeoma Ikpeama; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Nonutility of repeat laboratory testing for detection of Clostridium difficile by use of PCR or enzyme immunoassay.

Authors:  Elisabeth Aichinger; Cathy D Schleck; William S Harmsen; Lisa M Nyre; Robin Patel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Review of current literature on the economic burden of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Erik R Dubberke; Albert I Wertheimer
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.254

Review 6.  Clinical recognition and diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  John G Bartlett; Dale N Gerding
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  Does my patient have Clostridium difficile infection?

Authors:  Lance R Peterson; Ari Robicsek
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Evaluation of repeat Clostridium difficile enzyme immunoassay testing.

Authors:  Diana M Cardona; Kenneth H Rand
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Comparison of real-time PCR for detection of the tcdC gene with four toxin immunoassays and culture in diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Lynne M Sloan; Brian J Duresko; Daniel R Gustafson; Jon E Rosenblatt
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Toxin B is essential for virulence of Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Dena Lyras; Jennifer R O'Connor; Pauline M Howarth; Susan P Sambol; Glen P Carter; Tongted Phumoonna; Rachael Poon; Vicki Adams; Gayatri Vedantam; Stuart Johnson; Dale N Gerding; Julian I Rood
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  Molecular techniques for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  John C O'Horo; Amy Jones; Matthew Sternke; Christopher Harper; Nasia Safdar
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  A Guide to Utilization of the Microbiology Laboratory for Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases: 2018 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Society for Microbiology.

Authors:  J Michael Miller; Matthew J Binnicker; Sheldon Campbell; Karen C Carroll; Kimberle C Chapin; Peter H Gilligan; Mark D Gonzalez; Robert C Jerris; Sue C Kehl; Robin Patel; Bobbi S Pritt; Sandra S Richter; Barbara Robinson-Dunn; Joseph D Schwartzman; James W Snyder; Sam Telford; Elitza S Theel; Richard B Thomson; Melvin P Weinstein; Joseph D Yao
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 3.  Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection can molecular amplification methods move us out of uncertainty?

Authors:  Fred C Tenover; Ellen Jo Baron; Lance R Peterson; David H Persing
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 5.568

4.  Characteristics and Antibiotic Use Associated With Short-Term Risk of Clostridium difficile Infection Among Hospitalized Patients.

Authors:  Sol del Mar Aldrete; Matthew J Magee; Rachel J Friedman-Moraco; Austin W Chan; Grier G Banks; Eileen M Burd; Colleen S Kraft
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  Clinical characteristics of patients who test positive for Clostridium difficile by repeat PCR.

Authors:  Daniel A Green; Brie Stotler; Dana Jackman; Susan Whittier; Phyllis Della-Latta
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  Physical, Laboratory, Radiographic, and Endoscopic Workup for Clostridium difficile Colitis.

Authors:  Samantha J Baker; Daniel I Chu
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2020-02-25

7.  Evolution of testing algorithms at a university hospital for detection of Clostridium difficile infections.

Authors:  Karissa Culbreath; Edward Ager; Ronald J Nemeyer; Alan Kerr; Peter H Gilligan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 8.  Clostridium Difficile Infection from a Surgical Perspective.

Authors:  Andreas M Kaiser; Rachel Hogen; Liliana Bordeianou; Karim Alavi; Paul E Wise; Ranjan Sudan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Alerting physicians during electronic order entry effectively reduces unnecessary repeat PCR testing for Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Robert F Luo; Suzanne Spradley; Niaz Banaei
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Impact of changes in Clostridium difficile testing practices on stool rejection policies and C. difficile positivity rates across multiple laboratories in the United States.

Authors:  Jessica Cohen; Brandi Limbago; Ghinwa Dumyati; Stacy Holzbauer; Helen Johnston; Rebecca Perlmutter; John Dunn; Joelle Nadle; Carol Lyons; Erin Phipps; Zintars Beldavs; Leigh Ann Clark; Fernanda C Lessa
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.