Literature DB >> 22554563

Cerebellar involvement in motor but not sensory adaptation.

Hannah J Block1, Amy J Bastian.   

Abstract

Predictable sensorimotor perturbations can lead to cerebellum-dependent adaptation--i.e., recalibration of the relationship between sensory input and motor output. Here we asked if the cerebellum is also needed to recalibrate the relationship between two sensory modalities, vision and proprioception. We studied how people with and without cerebellar damage use visual and proprioceptive signals to estimate their hand's position when the sensory estimates disagree. Theoretically, the brain may resolve the discrepancy by recalibrating the relationship between estimates (sensory realignment). Alternatively, the misalignment may be dealt with by relying less on one sensory estimate and more on the other (a weighting strategy). To address this question, we studied subjects with cerebellar damage and healthy controls as they performed a series of tasks. The first was a prism adaptation task that involves motor adaptation to compensate for a visual perturbation and is known to require the cerebellum. As expected, people with cerebellar damage were impaired relative to controls. The same subjects then performed two experiments in which they reached to visual and proprioceptive targets while a visuoproprioceptive misalignment was gradually imposed. Surprisingly, cerebellar patients performed as well as controls when the task invoked only sensory realignment, but were impaired relative to controls when motor adaptation was also possible. Additionally, individuals with cerebellar damage were able to use a weighting strategy similarly to controls. These results demonstrate that, unlike motor adaptation, sensory realignment and weighting are not cerebellum-dependent.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22554563      PMCID: PMC3389289          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.03.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  32 in total

Review 1.  How are visual areas of the brain connected to motor areas for the sensory guidance of movement?

Authors:  M Glickstein
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 13.837

2.  The perceived position of the hand in space.

Authors:  P Haggard; C Newman; J Blundell; H Andrew
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-02

3.  When feeling is more important than seeing in sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  Robert J van Beers; Daniel M Wolpert; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2002-05-14       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Sensory reweighting in targeted reaching: effects of conscious effort, error history, and target salience.

Authors:  Hannah J Block; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Sensory weighting and realignment: independent compensatory processes.

Authors:  Hannah J Block; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  The corticopontine projection in the rhesus monkey. Origin and principles of organization.

Authors:  P Brodal
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  A theory of cerebellar cortex.

Authors:  D Marr
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1969-06       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  The inferior parietal lobule is the target of output from the superior colliculus, hippocampus, and cerebellum.

Authors:  D M Clower; R A West; J C Lynch; P L Strick
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Cerebellar long-term depression: characterization, signal transduction, and functional roles.

Authors:  M Ito
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 37.312

10.  Visuokinesthetic perception of hand movement is mediated by cerebro-cerebellar interaction between the left cerebellum and right parietal cortex.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Hagura; Yutaka Oouchida; Yu Aramaki; Tomohisa Okada; Michikazu Matsumura; Norihiro Sadato; Eiichi Naito
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-05-02       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  30 in total

1.  Split-belt walking adaptation recalibrates sensorimotor estimates of leg speed but not position or force.

Authors:  Alejandro Vazquez; Matthew A Statton; Stefanie A Busgang; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Adapting to inversion of the visual field: a new twist on an old problem.

Authors:  Timothy P Lillicrap; Pablo Moreno-Briseño; Rosalinda Diaz; Douglas B Tweed; Nikolaus F Troje; Juan Fernandez-Ruiz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Generalization patterns for reach adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration differ after visuomotor learning.

Authors:  Erin K Cressman; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Proprioceptive recalibration following implicit visuomotor adaptation is preserved in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Erin K Cressman; Danielle Salomonczyk; Alina Constantin; Janis Miyasaki; Elena Moro; Robert Chen; Antonio Strafella; Susan Fox; Anthony E Lang; Howard Poizner; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Cerebellar contributions to reach adaptation and learning sensory consequences of action.

Authors:  Jun Izawa; Sarah E Criscimagna-Hemminger; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Prism adaptation in Parkinson disease: comparing reaching to walking and freezers to non-freezers.

Authors:  Samuel T Nemanich; Gammon M Earhart
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Cerebellar metabolic involvement and its correlations with clinical parameters in vestibular neuritis.

Authors:  Marco Alessandrini; Alessandro Micarelli; Agostino Chiaravalloti; Matteo Candidi; Ernesto Bruno; Barbara Di Pietro; Johanna Öberg; Orazio Schillaci; Marco Pagani
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Sensory integration during reaching: the effects of manipulating visual target availability.

Authors:  Sajida Khanafer; Erin K Cressman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  How do age and nature of the motor task influence visuomotor adaptation?

Authors:  Samuel T Nemanich; Gammon M Earhart
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 2.840

10.  Virtual lesion of angular gyrus disrupts the relationship between visuoproprioceptive weighting and realignment.

Authors:  Hannah Block; Amy Bastian; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.