Literature DB >> 10746132

Optimal integration of texture and motion cues to depth.

R A Jacobs1.   

Abstract

We report the results of a depth-matching experiment in which subjects were asked to adjust the height of an ellipse until it matched the depth of a simulated cylinder defined by texture and motion cues. In one-third of the trials the shape of the cylinder was primarily given by motion information, in another one-third of the trials it was given by texture information, and on the remaining trials it was given by both sources of information. Two optimal cue combination models are described where optimality is defined in terms of Bayesian statistics. The parameter values of the models are set based on subjects' responses on trials when either the motion cue or the texture cue was informative. These models provide predictions of subjects' responses on trials when both cues were informative. The results indicate that one of the optimal models provides a good fit to the subjects' data, and the second model provides an exceptional fit. Because the predictions of the optimal models closely match the experimental data, we conclude that observers' cue-combination strategies are indeed optimal, at least under the conditions studied here.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10746132     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(99)00088-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  107 in total

Review 1.  Role of uncertainty in sensorimotor control.

Authors:  Robert J van Beers; Pierre Baraduc; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Representation of 3-D surface orientation by velocity and disparity gradient cues in area MT.

Authors:  Takahisa M Sanada; Jerry D Nguyenkim; Gregory C Deangelis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Knowing how much you don't know: a neural organization of uncertainty estimates.

Authors:  Dominik R Bach; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  Multisensory calibration is independent of cue reliability.

Authors:  Adam Zaidel; Amanda H Turner; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Perception of angular displacement without landmarks: evidence for Bayesian fusion of vestibular, optokinetic, podokinesthetic, and cognitive information.

Authors:  Reinhart Jürgens; Wolfgang Becker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-07-11       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Focus cues affect perceived depth.

Authors:  Simon J Watt; Kurt Akeley; Marc O Ernst; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 7.  Computational principles of sensorimotor control that minimize uncertainty and variability.

Authors:  Paul M Bays; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-09-28       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Flexible strategies for sensory integration during motor planning.

Authors:  Samuel J Sober; Philip N Sabes
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-03-27       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Dynamic reweighting of visual and vestibular cues during self-motion perception.

Authors:  Christopher R Fetsch; Amanda H Turner; Gregory C DeAngelis; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Multisensory oddity detection as bayesian inference.

Authors:  Timothy Hospedales; Sethu Vijayakumar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.