Literature DB >> 10607397

Touch can change visual slant perception.

M O Ernst1, M S Banks, H H Bülthoff.   

Abstract

The visual system uses several signals to deduce the three-dimensional structure of the environment, including binocular disparity, texture gradients, shading and motion parallax. Although each of these sources of information is independently insufficient to yield reliable three-dimensional structure from everyday scenes, the visual system combines them by weighting the available information; altering the weights would therefore change the perceived structure. We report that haptic feedback (active touch) increases the weight of a consistent surface-slant signal relative to inconsistent signals. Thus, appearance of a subsequently viewed surface is changed: the surface appears slanted in the direction specified by the haptically reinforced signal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10607397     DOI: 10.1038/71140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Neurosci        ISSN: 1097-6256            Impact factor:   24.884


  53 in total

1.  Task requirements influence sensory integration during grasping in humans.

Authors:  Daniel Säfström; Benoni B Edin
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  Demonstration of cue recruitment: change in visual appearance by means of Pavlovian conditioning.

Authors:  Qi Haijiang; Jeffrey A Saunders; Rebecca W Stone; Benjamin T Backus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-30       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  See what you've done! Active touch affects the number of perceived visual objects.

Authors:  Wilfried Kunde; Andrea Kiesel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-04

4.  Sensory integration does not lead to sensory calibration.

Authors:  Jeroen B J Smeets; John J van den Dobbelsteen; Denise D J de Grave; Robert J van Beers; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-27       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Neuronal activity in monkey primary somatosensory cortex is related to expectation of somatosensory and visual go-cues.

Authors:  Yu Liu; John M Denton; Randall J Nelson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-28       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Multi-sensory integration of spatio-temporal segmentation cues: one plus one does not always equal two.

Authors:  Feng Zhou; Victoria Wong; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Mental concatenation of perceptually and cognitively specified depth to represent locations in near space.

Authors:  Bing Wu; Roberta L Klatzky; Damion Shelton; George Stetten
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The dog's meow: asymmetrical interaction in cross-modal object recognition.

Authors:  Shlomit Yuval-Greenberg; Leon Y Deouell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Haptic perception disambiguates visual perception of 3D shape.

Authors:  Maarten W A Wijntjes; Robert Volcic; Sylvia C Pont; Jan J Koenderink; Astrid M L Kappers
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-02-08       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Illusory visual-depth reversal can modulate sensations of contact surface.

Authors:  Yuka Igarashi; Keiko Omori; Tetsuya Arai; Yasunori Aizawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.